Explain why employers pay a lower efficiency wage when unemployment is high. How would the efficiency wage change in an economy if it became easier to monitor the work that employees did? Other than to incentivise workers to put in effort, can you think of any other reasons why wages might| be higher when unemployment is low (i.e. an upward-sloping wage-setting curve)?

Explain why employers pay a lower efficiency wage when unemployment is high. How would the efficiency wage change in an economy if it became easier to monitor the work that employees did? Other than to incentivise workers to put in effort, can you think of any other reasons why wages might| be higher when unemployment is low (i.e. an upward-sloping wage-setting curve)?

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter18: Introduction To Macroeconomics: Unemployment, Inflation, And Economic Fluctuations

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 7P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Beginning in the 1970s and continuing for three decades, women entered the U.S. labor force in a big way. If we assume that wages are sticky in a downward direction, but that around 1970 the demand for labor equaled the supply of labor at the current wage rate, what do you imagine happened to the wage rate, employment, and unemployment as a result of increased labor force participation?
While unemployment is highly negatively correlated with the level of economic activity, in the real world it responds with a lag. In other wands, firms do not immediately lay off workers in response to a sales decline. They wait a while before responding. Similarly, firms do not immediately hire workers when sales pick up. What do you think accounts for the lag in response time?
If you an? out of school but working part time, are you considered employed or unemployed in U.S. labor statistics? If you are a full time student and working 12 hours a week at the college cafeteria are you considered employed or not in the labor force? If you are a senior citizen who is collecting social security and a pension and working as a greater at Wal-Mart are you considered employed or not in the labor force?
Is it desirable to eliminate natural unemployment? Why or why not? Hint: Think about what our economy would look like today and what assumptions would have to be met to have a zero rate of natural unemployment.
Unemployment rates have been higher in many European countries in recent decades than in the United States. Is the main reason for this long-term difference in unemployment rates more likely to be cyclical unemployment or the natural rate of unemployment? Explain briefly.
Is the increase in labor force participation rates among women better thought of as causing an increase in cyclical unemployment or an increase in the natural rate of unemployment? Why?
on January 1, 2019, South Africa's first-ever national minimum wage came into effect. The legislation stipulated a minimum national rate of R20 per hour, or R3500 per month, depending on the number of hours worked. Some economists warned that it may depress SA's already high unemployment rate further by making it more expensive to hire workers. Using your knowledge of basic economic theory, illustrate and explain with the aid of a graph why some economists might have given such a warning?
If the unemployment rate is 6% before a rise in government purchases, and if a rise in government purchases induces the typicalunemployed person to search 10% longer in the hopes of finding ahigh-paying government job, what will the unemployment rate beafter the rise in government purchases? Only consider the impactof this waiting-for-a-good-job effect.
The college graduates of 2000 could hardly have asked for better luck. The unemployment ratedropped to 4.1 % in May 2000- roughly, the lowest level in a generation- and employers wereliterally scrambling for new hires. Starting salaries rose, many graduating seniors had numerousjob offers, and some firms even offered $10,000- $20,000 bonuses to students who signed thedotted line. Three years later, the job market for the Class of 2003 was rather different. U.S. economic growth had slowed to a crawl, and then to a halt. Companies that had stocked up on recent college grads in the tighter labour markets of 1998-2000 found themselves with more than they knew what to do with in 2002 and 2003. They were not eager to hire more. Bonuses and other “perks” disappeared; job offers became scarcer. With the unemployment rate around 6% in May and June of 2003, the job market was far from the worst ever. But it was nothing like the glory days of 2000. Discussion:(i) Briefly explain and justify…