g. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.O f the population mean IQ score for younger siblings is the same as the population mean. IQScore for older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given ana 2.28% chance that the mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblings would differ by at least 4.5points from the mean IQ score for the 10 older siblings.test then there would beO There is a 2.28% chance that the mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblings differs by at least4.5 points from the mean IQ score for the 10 older siblings.O If the sample mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblings is the same as the sample mean IQScore for the 10 older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given an IQ test then therewould be a 2.28% chance of concluding that the mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblingsdiffers by at least 4.5 points from the mean IQ score for the 10 older siblings.O There is a 2.28% chance of a Type I error.h. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.O If the population mean IQ score for younger siblings is the same as the population mean IQscore for older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given an IQ test, then there would bea 1% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the population mean IQ score foryounger siblings is not the same as the population mean IQ score for older siblingsO There is a 1% chance that you are so much smarter than your sibling that there is no need totake an IQ test to make a comparison.O If the population mean IQ score for younger siblings is the same as the population mean IQscore for older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given an IQ test, then there would bea 1% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the sample mean IQ scores for these10 sibling pairs differ from each other.O There is a 1% chance that the population mean IQ score is the same for younger and oldersiblings. YoungerSibling97 85 92 111 82 101 101 110 112 100OlderSibling94 92 97 115 80 113 103113 125 104Assume a Normal distribution. What can be concluded at the the a = 0.01 level of significance?For this study, we should use Select an answera. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:Ho:Select an answer ♥Select an answer vSelect an answer v (please enter a decimal)H: Select an answer vSelect an answer v Select an answer v (Please enter a decimal)b. The test statistic ? v is -2.741. Enter it here(please show your answer to 3 decimalplaces.)c. The p-value is 0.0228. Enter it here(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)d. The p-value is ? v ae. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis.f. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to concludethat the population mean IQ score for younger siblings is not the same as the population meanIQ Score for older siblingsO The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to concludethat the ten younger siblings' IQ scores are not the same on average than the ten older siblingsIQ Scores.O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence toconclude that the population mean IQ score for younger siblings is not the same as thepopulation mean IQ score for older siblings.11:02 AM96%62°F Cloudy

Question

Accepted Answer

The p-value can be defined as the probability of the test statistic is as extreme as the observed…