Maria can work up to 40 hours per week at Sparkle, one of many competitive firms that make and sell hand-crafted jewelry and pay $25 per hour. The budget constraint below shows the tradeoff that she faces in terms of earnings versus leisure each week. S earnings $1,000 Maria's weekly budget constraint 40 leisure (hours) A. In an effort to raise revenues, the government is considering raising income taxes on workers like Maria. How would a higher tax change Maria's budget constraint?

Maria can work up to 40 hours per week at Sparkle, one of many competitive firms that make and sell hand-crafted jewelry and pay $25 per hour. The budget constraint below shows the tradeoff that she faces in terms of earnings versus leisure each week. S earnings $1,000 Maria's weekly budget constraint 40 leisure (hours) A. In an effort to raise revenues, the government is considering raising income taxes on workers like Maria. How would a higher tax change Maria's budget constraint?

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305585126

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter21: The Theory Of Consumer Choice

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider a person who can work up to 80 hours each week at a pretax wage of $20 per hour but faces a constant 20 percent payroll tax. Under these conditions, the worker maximizes her utility by choosing to work 50 hours each week. The government proposes a negative income tax whereby everyone is given $300 each week and anyone can supplement her income further by working. To pay for the negative income tax, the payroll tax rate will be increased to 50 percent.a. On a single graph, draw the worker’s original budget line and her budget line under the negative income tax.b. Show that the worker will choose to work fewer hours if the negative income tax is a dopted.c. Will the worker’s utility be greater under the negative income tax?
Consider a consumer who could earn $400 per week and has 50 weeks available each year to allocate between work (H) and nonmarket time (L). They have no non-labour income. Their utility function is U = C2L , where C is the value of consumption goods. What is their optimal choice for the number of weeks in nonmarket time and consumption? Show this in a diagram. Suppose the government introduces a policy that (i) offers no benefits to people who do not work, (ii) offers a wage subsidy on earnings at a rate of 25%, with a maximum benefit of $5000, and (iii) the benefit is subject to reduction at a rate of 25% for every dollar earned above $20,000 in the year. Show the person’s new budget constraint in a new diagram, and discuss how the person’s optimal choice might change (you do not have to calculate this, but point to where it is likely on the new budget constraint). Discuss how income and substitution effects play a role.
Graphically illustrate the TANF example with a 2,000-hour constraint between work and leisure and a $10 per hour wage rate. Illustrate two cases in the same graph, a guaranteed benefit of $5,000 and $3,000 with a benefit reduction rate of 50% in both cases. Identify the case of Sarah who reduces leisure when the guaranteed benefit is reduced from $5,000 to $3,000.
Explain how the wage can adjust to balance thesupply and demand for labor while simultaneouslyequaling the value of the marginal product oflabor.
Consider the following labor-leisure choice model. U(C,L) = C^2/3L^1/3 C = wN + π – T H= N+ L Where C: consumptionL: leisureN: hours workedH = 50 : total hoursw = 4 : hourly wageπ = 20 : non-labor income T = 10 : lump-sum tax Suppose the hourly wage changes to w = 5. Perform a decomposition and fill in the table C L N Substitution Effect Income Effect Total Effect
One proposal for reforming the welfare system is to create a negative income tax. Under the negative income tax, each person is entitled to a grant of G dollars permonth. For every dollar the person earns, the grant is reduced by t dollars. a. Suppose G = 200 and t = 0.40. Consider an individual whose hourly wage = $10. There are 30 days in a month, so the total allotment of T = 720. Sketch the budgetconstraint before and after the introduction of the negative income tax. b. Would people work more or less with the implementation of this system? c. What if t = 100%? Explain!
4. Akua gains utility from consumption C and leisure L. The most leisure she can consume in any given week is 110 hours. Her utility function is U (C, L) = C × L. Akua receives 660 GHS each week from her great-grandmother—regardless of how much she works. a. What will be Akua’s marginal rate of substitution. b. What will be Akua’s reservation wage? (Explain in detail)
There are two consumers, Cindy and Shelly. Cindy’s marginal rate of substitution equals C/L.Shelly’s marginal rate of substitution equals (C – 200)/(L – 80). Assume that each personchooses not to work and that there are 168 hours in a given week. Since Cindy and Shelly arenot working, they qualify for welfare. Assume each individual earns $630 in welfare paymentseach week whether they work or not.(a) Given these numbers, calculate each person’s MRS. Show your work.(b) Using your answer from part (a), graph Cindy’s and Shelly’s indifference curves onthe same set of axes. Label everything.(c) Assume Cindy and Shelly are each offered a job, and they each could earn the samereal wage. Given your answer from part (a), who is more likely to take the job andwhy?
Darla gets her utility from consumption C and leisure L. The most leisure she can consume in any given week is 110 hours. Her utility function is U(C, L) = C x L. This implies that Darla’s marginal rate of substitution is C / L Darla receives $750 each week from her grandparents–regardless of how much she works. What is Darla’s reservation wage?
True or False. Explain why. Deniz’s preferences for consumption and leisure is as follows:U(C,L)=C2LDeniz has 100 hours in the week available to split between work and leisure. She earns $10 per hour after taxes. She also receives $260 worth of welfare benefits each week. Deniz’s optimal amount of leisure time will be 45 whereas labour supply will be 55.
(a) Carlos has 168 hours per week to divide between labour and leisure. For his job, Carlos is allowed to work up to 60 hours a week earning a wage of $25, but faces a payroll tax of 20%. Given these constraints, Carlos chooses to work 40 hours per week. Graph the budget constraint and indicate the optimal choice, make sure to label all important points. (b) The government proposes a universal basic income whereby everyone is given $200 a week, which is financed by increasing the payroll tax to 40%. Add this new budget constraint to your diagram from (a). Be sure to show all your work/calculations, and label all important points. Is this likely to increase or decrease labour supply for Carlos? Carefully explain. (It is important that you carefully draw your diagram for this question, and compare it to the one in (a)).
Demonstrate using clearly labeled diagrams that the labor supply for leisure being normal (SE>IE) ismost inelastic, for leisure being inferior is most elastic and for neither case is somewhere in the middle.