Multiple Choice Adverse selection describes a situation where an individual's demand for insurance is positively correlated with the individual's risk of loss. Adverse selection occurs when someone increases their exposure to risk when insured. This can happen, for example, when a person takes more risks because someone else bears the cost of those risks. The relationship between smoking status and mortality provides a good illustration for adverse selection, especially in the case in which a life insurance company did not vary its premiums according to smoking status of its customers. To counter the effects of adverse selection, insurers may offer premiums that are proportional to a customer's risk.

In a market, there are various activities that results in market failure, such that externality,…

Multiple Choice Adverse selection describes a situation where an individual's demand for insurance is positively correlated with the individual's risk of loss. Adverse selection occurs when someone increases their exposure to risk when insured. This can happen, for example, when a person takes more risks because someone else bears the cost of those risks.

Multiple Choice Adverse selection describes a situation where an individual's demand for insurance is positively correlated with the individual's risk of loss. Adverse selection occurs when someone increases their exposure to risk when insured. This can happen, for example, when a person takes more risks because someone else bears the cost of those risks.

EBK HEALTH ECONOMICS AND POLICY

7th Edition

ISBN:9781337668279

Author:Henderson

Publisher:Henderson

Chapter4: Economic Evaluation In Health Care

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3QAP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Which of the following statements is FALSE regarding the concept of "adverse selection"? Multiple Choice Adverse selection describes a situation where an individual's demand for insurance is positively correlated with the individual's risk of loss. Adverse selection occurs when someone increases their exposure to risk when insured. This can happen, for example, when a person takes more risks because someone else bears the cost of those risks. The relationship between smoking status and mortality provides a good illustration for adverse selection, especially in the case in which a life insurance company did not vary its premiums according to smoking status of its customers. To counter the effects of adverse selection, insurers may offer premiums that are proportional to a customer's risk.
In the mid-1990s, the state of New Jersey revised its rules for the individual insurance market and began requiring that insurers charge the same premiums for the same coverage to all applicants. Assuming that insurers had previously used medical underwriting, which of the following is a predictable consequence of adverse selection? 1) Insurance becomes less attractive to the healthiest individuals, so fewer of them buy it 2) Insurers’ average costs of providing coverage increase because of a changing risk pool 3) The average age of those buying in the individual market goes up 4) All of the above
Suppose, if ill, that Fred’s demand for health services is summarized by the demand curve Q = 50 − 2P , where P is the price of services. How many services does he buy at a price of $20? Suppose that Fred’s probability of illness is 0.25. What is the actuarially fair price of health insurance for Fred with a zero coinsurance rate? If the insurance company pays Fred’s entire loss, will the insurance company offer him insurance at the actuarially fair rate? Why? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
Consider the Figure, which depicts a scenario in the Rothschild–Stiglitz model of adverse selection.a. Explain why α is not a valid pooling equilibrium.b. Explain why your answer to the previous question depends on an assumption that expected utility theory holds.c. Suppose the Pcorian government is trying to maintain α as a pooling equilibrium to ensure universal insurance for its long-suffering populace. The government health minister is familiar with the work of Kahneman and Tversky and wants to take advantage of the fact that Pcorians are loss averse and susceptible to framing. When a private insurance company begins offering contract δ, how should the government frame the tradeoff between α and δ to try to keep robust customers at α?
One major premise of the Rothschild–Stiglitz model is that there is a perfectly competitive market for health insurance. Suppose instead that the market is not perfectly competitive, and in fact competitor firms have a hard time entering the market. Could a pooling equilibrium occur in this case? What is it about competition that prevents pooling in the Rothschild–Stiglitz model? No formal proof is necessary, but do make your reasoning clear. Evaluate the following statement: competition in health insurance markets is harmful.
Indicate whether the statement is true or false, and justify your answer.Private markets are powerless to combat adverse selection, so the only solution is a government-mandated insurance contract.
Indicate whether the statement is true or false, and justify your answer.In a Rothschild–Stiglitz model separating equilibrium, low-risk consumers of insurance are quantity constrained. They cannot buy as much insurance as they want because the insurance company is worried it will lose money on them.
Let W represents an individual’s annual earned income and U(W) = (W/10)0.5 is this individual’s von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index (or utility function) . This individual earned income is $49,000. This individual faces the prospect of a 20% chance of needing health care, with a price tag of $13,000. Assume this person is risk averse. Also assume that the insurance company has only claim costs and that administrative costs are $0. The maximum health insurance premium this individual is willing to pay is??
Indicate whether the statement is true or false, and justify your answer.To date, no major health insurance experiment has studied the impact of uninsurance, just different levels of insurance.
Consider a variant of the benchmark model of adverse selection. The types of workers (θ) are uniformly drawn from the unit interval [0,1]. A θ-type worker can produce θ units of some product if he is hired by firms. (Workers are the only input in the production.) The price of the product is normalised as 1. Before entering the labor market, workers decide whether to secure some certificate at a cost c ∈ (0, 1) or not. The certificate can fully reveal a worker’s type and he then decides whether to show it to firms or not. If a θ-type worker decides to quit the labor market, he can earn θ/4 from self-employment. Find the competitive equilibrium. (Hint, if a θ-type worker obtains the certificate and shows it to firms, he will receive a wage of θ from the market. For sure, he can also decide to join the labor market without obtaining or showing the certificate.)
Suppose that left-handed people are more prone to injury than right-handed people. Lefties have an 80 percent chance of suffering an injury leading to a $1,000 loss (in terms of medical expenses and the monetary equivalent of pain and suffering) but righties have only a 20 percent chance of suffering such an injury. The population contains equal numbers of lefties and righties. Individuals all have logarithmic utility-of-wealth functions and initial wealth of $10,000. Assume perfectly competitive insurance market and find (i) the first best and (ii) the second-best contracts.
Consider two individuals whose utility function over wealth I is ?(?) = √?. Both people face a 10 percent chance of getting sick, and foreach the total cost of illness equals $50,000. Suppose person A has a total net worth of $100,000, and person B has a total net worth of $1,000,000. Both people have the option to buy an actuarially fair insurance contract that would fully insure them against the cost of the illness. a. Using expected utility calculations, show that person A would certainly buy full, actuarially fair insurance. b. Suppose an insurance company wants to maximize profits and wants to charge each customer the maximum price they are willing to pay. How much should the insurance company charge each client so that both buy the contract? c. What is surprising about your result in part b? What does this tell you about how insurance companies may be pricing health insurance contracts in the real world?