In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age, researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim of independence between texting while driving and drivingwhen drinking alcohol. Are those two risky behaviors independent of each other?Click the icon to view the table of survey results.Determine the null and alternative hypotheses.Ho:H₁:Determine the test statistic.x² =(Round to two decimal places as needed.)Determine the P-value of the test statistic.P-value= (Round to three decimal places as needed.)Do the results suggest that texting while driving and driving while drinking are related?CO A. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol.O B. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors arenot related.O C. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while driving and driving while drinking alcohol. Those two risky behaviors appear to besomehow related.O D. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while drinking alcohol. Survey ResultsTexted While DrivingNo Texting While DrivingDrove When Drinking Alcohol?YesNo73615930414492

ne the null and alternative hypotheses. ine the test statistic. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) ine the P-value of the test statistic. -=(Round to three decimal places as needed.) results suggest that texting while driving and driving while drinking are related? Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while dri Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting w not related. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while drivin somehow related.

ne the null and alternative hypotheses. ine the test statistic. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) ine the P-value of the test statistic. -=(Round to three decimal places as needed.) results suggest that texting while driving and driving while drinking are related? Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that texting while driving happens 95% of the time when driving while dri Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting w not related. Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at a 0.05 significance level to warrant rejection of the claim of independence between texting while drivin somehow related.

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018

18th Edition

ISBN:9780079039897

Author:Carter

Publisher:Carter

Chapter4: Equations Of Linear Functions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8SGR

See similar textbooks