Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
Pott (1992) looked at the effect of feeding dietary molybdenum (Mo) on the Mo concentration in sheep kidneys. 20 sheep were randomly allocated to one of the four treatment groups. Group Treatment Mo concentration (ppm) 1 2.8 3.2 3.6 3.4 4.1 2 4.6 2.7 4.4 3.3 5.1 4.5 8.6 5.0 4.9 3.7 4 7.8 5.9 9.2 9.7 15.7 The Sums of Squares are also given as follows: SST = 118.98; SSE = 73.46; MST = 39.66 and MSE = 4.59. Test at a 5% significance level if there is a differ the four treatment groups. State your conclusion if the F statistic = 8.64. 3

Pott (1992) looked at the effect of feeding dietary molybdenum (Mo) on the Mo concentration in sheep kidneys. 20 sheep were randomly allocated to one of the four treatment groups. Group Treatment Mo concentration (ppm) 1 2.8 3.2 3.6 3.4 4.1 2 4.6 2.7 4.4 3.3 5.1 4.5 8.6 5.0 4.9 3.7 4 7.8 5.9 9.2 9.7 15.7 The Sums of Squares are also given as follows: SST = 118.98; SSE = 73.46; MST = 39.66 and MSE = 4.59. Test at a 5% significance level if there is a differ the four treatment groups. State your conclusion if the F statistic = 8.64. 3

Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition 2012
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition 2012
1st Edition
ISBN:9780547587776
Author:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Chapter11: Data Analysis And Probability
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 8CR
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question

Please assist with following question 

Pott (1992) looked at the effect of feeding dietary molybdenum (Mo) on the Mo concentration in sheep kidneys. 20 sheep were randomly allocated to one of the four treatment groups. thiass Group Treatment Mo concentration (ppm) 3.4 4.1 3.3 5.1 3 8.6 4.9 7.8 9.7 15.7 The Sums of Squares are also given as follows: SST = 118.98; SSE = 73.46; MST = 39.66 and MSE = 4.59. Test at a 5% significance level if there is a difference in the four treatment groups. State your conclusion if the F statistic = 8.64. E O A. Ho is not rejected. There is no difference in the treatment groups. OB. Ho is not rejected. There is enough statistical evidence to conclude that at least two means differ. O C. Ho is rejected. There is enough statistical evidence to conclude that there is a difference in at least two of the treatment groups. OD. Ho is rejected. There is enough evidence to conclude that treatments are all the same. Reset Selection ECH MA 0 CEF ENG 3 17 f6 f7 M 15 f80/ f9 ZO f10 12 f11 f12 /A prt sc 20
Transcribed Image Text:Pott (1992) looked at the effect of feeding dietary molybdenum (Mo) on the Mo concentration in sheep kidneys. 20 sheep were randomly allocated to one of the four treatment groups. thiass Group Treatment Mo concentration (ppm) 3.4 4.1 3.3 5.1 3 8.6 4.9 7.8 9.7 15.7 The Sums of Squares are also given as follows: SST = 118.98; SSE = 73.46; MST = 39.66 and MSE = 4.59. Test at a 5% significance level if there is a difference in the four treatment groups. State your conclusion if the F statistic = 8.64. E O A. Ho is not rejected. There is no difference in the treatment groups. OB. Ho is not rejected. There is enough statistical evidence to conclude that at least two means differ. O C. Ho is rejected. There is enough statistical evidence to conclude that there is a difference in at least two of the treatment groups. OD. Ho is rejected. There is enough evidence to conclude that treatments are all the same. Reset Selection ECH MA 0 CEF ENG 3 17 f6 f7 M 15 f80/ f9 ZO f10 12 f11 f12 /A prt sc 20
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS