QUESTION 351(Ca+I+G+Xn)1- mpc + mpc · t1AQ =(AC, + Al + AG + AX,)1- mpc+ mpc t| = 100, G= 200, Ca = 100, Xn =-100,mpc D 4/5, t (income tax rate) = 1/4%3D%3D35. Given this model, what is the income multiplier?O 1/52/52.54.5OUESTION 36OOO

We have given following information I = 100, G = 200, Ca = 100, Xn = -100 MPC = 4/5 = 0.8 and…

QUESTION 35 1 Q: 1- mpc + mpc t (Ca +I+G+X„) %3D 1 AQ 1- mpc + mpc ·t (ACa + AI + AG + AXn) |= 100, G = 200, Ca = 100, Xn =-100, mpc = 4/5, t (income tax rate) = 1/4 %3D 35. Given this model, what is the income multiplier? 1/5 2/5 2.5 4.

QUESTION 35 1 Q: 1- mpc + mpc t (Ca +I+G+X„) %3D 1 AQ 1- mpc + mpc ·t (ACa + AI + AG + AXn) |= 100, G = 200, Ca = 100, Xn =-100, mpc = 4/5, t (income tax rate) = 1/4 %3D 35. Given this model, what is the income multiplier? 1/5 2/5 2.5 4.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

16. Suppose that planned investment and planned government purchases do not depend on income:I = 15 and G = 17. Consumption, as you would expect, does depend on income via the consumption function C = 2 + 0.75Y – 0.75T. Net taxes are T = 12. Your friend thinks that the equilibrium will be where Y = 150 but he is wrong. What is the best description of this situation? a. the (Y, AE) point is above the 45 degree line, Y will adjust down b. the (Y, AE) point is above the 45 degree line, Y will adjust up c. the (Y, AE) point is below the 45 degree line, Y will adjust down d. the (Y, AE) point is below the 45 degree line, Y will adjust up 17. (continued) Help you friend by calculating the equilibrium income for the AE model in the previous question. Y = _____
5 3. permanent Income Hypothesis a) suppose that beta=.9 and R= 2222 (that is ~22%). For an individual who acts according to the PIH, will their consumption next period be higher than current consumption or lower? b) What is the main crucial difference between the Keynesian Consumption function and the consumption function derived from the PIH (or Lifetime Income Hypothesis)? c) If Present Value of future income stream is 500,000 and a person has a beta of.8, how much will their consumption go up today if only today's income increases by 1000? How much will their consumption increase (approximately) if their income goes up by 1000 in all periods?
The Based on the following equations Saving (S)= 0.2Y Investment(1)= - 30r + 740, Money Supply(Ms)= 4000 Transaction Demand for Money(L 1) = 0.15Y Speculative demand for money (L2) =-20r+3825. The simple investment multiplier is
6 Suppose a closed economy with no government spending or taxing initially. Suppose also that intended investment is equal to 100 and the aggregate consumption function is given by C = 250 + 0.75Y. And suppose that, if at full employment, the economy would produce an output and income of 3500 By how much would the government need to raise spending (G) to bring the economy to full employment? (round your answer to the nearest whole value)
#wk4-10 Suppose that the investment demand curve in a certain economy is such that investment declines by $120 billion for every 1 percentage point increase in the real interest rate. Also, suppose that the investment demand curve shifts rightward by $170 billion at each real interest rate for every 1 percentage point increase in the expected rate of return from investment.If stimulus spending (an expansionary fiscal policy) by government increases the real interest rate by 2 percentage points, but also raises the expected rate of return on investment by 1 percentage point, how much investment, if any, will be crowded out?$ billion
Suppose that the investment demand curve in a certain economy is such that investment declines by $110 billion for every 1 percentage point increase in the real interest rate. Also, suppose that the investment demand curve shifts rightward by $170 billion at each real interest rate for every 1 percentage point increase in the expected rate of return from investment. If stimulus spending (an expansionary fiscal policy) by government increases the real interest rate by 2 percentage points, but also raises the expected rate of return on investment by 1 percentage point, how much investment, if any, will be crowded out? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
Consider the following 2-period model U(C1,C2) = min{3C1,4C2} C1 + S = Y1 – T1 C2 = Y2 – T2 + (1+r)S Where C1 : first period consumption C2 : second period consumption S : first period saving Y1 = 20 : first period income T1 = 5 : first period lump-sum tax Y2 = 50 : second period income T2 = 10 : second period lump-sum tax r = 0.05 : real interest rate Find the optimal saving, S*
(a) Assume that Gross Domestic Product (GDP)/Total output (Y) is 6,000. Consumption (C) is given by the equation C = 600 + 0.6(Y – T) where T is the tax. Investment (I) is given by the equation I = 2,000 – 100r, where r is the real rate of interest, in percent. Taxes (T) are 500, and government spending (G) is also 500. What are the equilibrium values of C, I, and r?
Limitless Ltd. is planning to buy a new warehouse to store its production output. The investment would require £500,000 to be paid upfront. Thanks to the new warehouse, the company expects to increase its profits by £120,000 annually for the next five years, and then £60,000 for the following five years. Calculate the Net Present Value (NPV) of this investment opportunity if the cost of capital is 12%. Should Limitless Ltd. go ahead with the purchase of the new warehouse? Explain your reasoning. What is the payback period of this investment? Suppose the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of this investment opportunity is 15%. Based on this information alone, should Limitless Ltd. make the investment? Why? Would this decision be consistent with that from B? Explain your reasoning. Suppose that, instead of paying the initial £500,000 now, Limitless Ltd. decides to pay it in equal instalments over the next 10 years. How much would the company need to pay each year to make all…
Suppose that when government lowers corporate taxes this results in an increase in business investment of $280 billion. Further assume that MPC = 0.93. Calculate the value of MPS: Calculate the value of the multiplier: Compute the first three rounds of multiplier effects and cumulative effect on AD: Cumulative effect on AD: 1st cycle: 2nd cycle: 3rd cycle: Compute the total cumulative impact on AD after an infinite number of cycles (the "nth" cycle):
Determine the equilibrium income y and interest rate r,given the following information about the commodity market C=0.6Y+60 I=-40r+1300 Where C and I dwnote consumption and planned invesment ,respectively,and the following information about the money market Ms=600L1=0,2y L2=-30r+40
Consider a closed economy with fixed prices and wages. Suppose consumption function takes the form C = 150+0,8Yd, Investments are I = 200, government purchases are G = 350, tax rate t= 0,1. There are no lump-sum taxes. (some calculations are added in the images) 1)Compute the government spending multiplier before and after changes in tax rate. Explain why multiplier is changed? 2) If the potential output is 3000 and economy is in initial equilibrium (a) what changes in government purchases the Government need to implement in order to achieve potential output? Show how changes in government purchases affect the planned aggregate spending line and new equilibrium output.