Rupert really loves pizza, but he eventually tires of it. The table on the right shows the highest price that Rupert is willing to pay For each successive pizza per week. Rupert's Willingness to Pay $18 $16 $13 $9 $4 $0 Pizzas First Second a. Suppose Rupert were to eat one pizza per week. What is the otal value Rupert would place on his one weekly pizza? Third Fourth Fifth The total value Rupert would place on his one weekly pizza is Sixth $ 18 . p. If the market price is $16 per pizza, then Rupert will eat bizzas per week with a weekly consumer surplus of $.

Rupert really loves pizza, but he eventually tires of it. The table on the right shows the highest price that Rupert is willing to pay For each successive pizza per week. Rupert's Willingness to Pay $18 $16 $13 $9 $4 $0 Pizzas First Second a. Suppose Rupert were to eat one pizza per week. What is the otal value Rupert would place on his one weekly pizza? Third Fourth Fifth The total value Rupert would place on his one weekly pizza is Sixth $ 18 . p. If the market price is $16 per pizza, then Rupert will eat bizzas per week with a weekly consumer surplus of $.

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter6: Consumer Choices

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1SCQ: Jeremy is deeply in love with Jasmine. Jasmine lives where cell phone coverage is poor, so he can...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

What are four responses to the claim that people should not behave in the way described in this chapter?
Jeremy is deeply in love with Jasmine. Jasmine lives where cell phone coverage is poor, so he can either call her on the land-line phone for five cents per minute or he can drive to see her, at a roundâ€”trip cost of 2 in gasoline money. He has a total of 10 per week to spend on staying in touch. To make his preferred choice, Jeremy uses a handy utilimometer that measures his total utility from personal visits and from phone minutes. Using the values in Table 6.6, figure out the points 011 Jeremys consumption choice budget constraint (it may be helpful to do a sketch) and identify his utility-maximizing point.
The rules of politics are not always the same as the rules of economics. In discussions of setting budgets for government agencies, there is a strategy called closing the Washington Monument. When an agency faces the unwelcome prospect of a budget cut, it may decide to close a high-visibility attraction enjoyed by many people (like the Washington Monument). Explain in terms of diminishing marginal utility why the Washington Monument strategy is So misleading. Hint: If you are really trying to make the best of a budget cut, should you cut the items in your budget with tile highest marginal utility or line lowest marginal utility? Does the Washington Monument strategy cut the items with the highest marginal utility or line lowest marginal utility?
a. A young connoisseur has $600 to spend to build a smallwine cellar. She enjoys two vintages in particular: a 2001French Bordeaux (wF) at $40 per bottle and a less expensive 2005 California varietal wine (wC) priced at $8. Ifher utility is U (wF, wC))=wF2/3 w C1/3 ,then how much of each wine should she purchase?b. When she arrived at the wine store, this young oenologistdiscovered that the price of the French Bordeaux hadfallen to $20 a bottle because of a decrease in the valueof the euro. If the price of the California wine remainsstable at $8 per bottle, how much of each wine shouldour friend purchase to maximize utility under thesealtered conditions?c. Explain why this wine fancier is better off in part (b)than in part (a). How would you put a monetary value onthis utility increase?
4. a. Consider a consumer with preferences defined over x and y. Demonstrate that it is possible theywould choose to consume some of both commodities when their income is I but would choose toconsume only x when their income is I’ > I. (Remember: if you can draw it without violating anyof the basic assumptions on preferences, it could happen.) b. Conversely, demonstrate that it is possible they would choose to consume only x when theirincome is I but would choose to consume x and y when their income is I’ > I.c. Finally, show it is possible that they would choose to consume only y when their income is I butwould choose to consume only x when their income is I’ > I.
Co. XYZ manufactures a productand sells it for $8 per unit. Her fixedcosts are $5,000 and her variablecost per unit is given by the equationCalculate the equilibrium quantity qalgebraically. 2.444 (X)-2200 A. (q-800) B. q=900 C. (q 650) D. None of the above In the previous problem (27), calculate the amount ofequilibrium Total Income. A. 4,500 B.$3,000 C. $7,200 D. $9,000 In the above problem (27), calculate thebreak-even Total Cost amount. A. 4,500 B. $3,000 C. $9,200 D. 7,200 In the previous problem (27)determine the profit when q-1800.modes of A. $4,500 B. 5,000 C.$6,000 D. 7,000 In the previous problem (27), determine the gain when q-450. A. $2,500 B. -$2,500 C.$6,000 D. -$4,500 In the aboveproblem (27), find the required output (q), to make a profit of$10,000. A. 3,000 B. 4,000 C. 2,500D. 2,700
In today’s economy, it’s harder for workers to get promoted. In 2006, it took an averageof 2 ½ years to get a promotion; today it takes 4 ½ years. As a result, fewer workers are willingto boost their productivity in an effort to impress the boss and get the promotion. In 2006, 25percent of employees said they were willing to give “an extra oomph” at work (boost theirproductivity); today about 15 percent are willing to do so. Explain the connection to the Phillipscurve.
Consider the market for a single network good and suppose thatconsumers differ in their valuation of both the stand-alone and thenetwork benefits (it can indeed be argued that it is more plausiblethat a user who has a higher value for the stand-alone component of atechnology also assigns more importance to the size of its network.) Tocapture this idea, write the consumer’s utility function for joining thenetwork as U(θ) = θ(a + νne), where a is the stand-alone benefit, ν > 0measures the network effect, neis the expected number of users joiningthe network, and is uniformly distributed on the unit interval.a. What happens if p > a + νne? (Hint: Identify all consumer who buythe good for at price p and a given expected network size ne).b. What is the consumer’s willingness to pay for the nth unit of thegood when ne units are expected to be sold? Is the demand downwardsloping? Does the demand increase with the expected network size?c. Express the fulfilled-expectations demand curve…
question as image a. If she can visit only one of the stores, which one would she go and what would be her optimal bundle there? Could she afford this very bundle at the other store? (b) If she can freely visit both stores, (buying each commodity from the store where it is cheaper !!) what would be her optimal bundle? What would she buy from each store? (c) Back to (a), how much money would she willing to give up (out of her $720 budget) for the ability to visit both stores rather than only one store? (HINT: After giving up that money, she is left with less money with which optimizing utility with the option of visiting both stores -buying each commodity from the cheaper store- she is able to achieve the same level of utility in the scenario with the original uncut budget but having to choose only one of the stores to shop at)
abby is a single mom with a weekly budget of $100. She can spend her weeklyincome on food and diapers for her son. Price of food is $1 and price of a diaperis 50 cents. Her son needs at least 5 diapers a day, therefore she must purchaseat least 35 diapers weekly. Jennifer’s utility function is U (f, d) = f 0.9d0.1,where f and d represent quantity of food and diapers, respectively.Question 1 Part aFind abbys optimal consumption bundle. Make sure to draw her budgetconstraint and indifference curves and clearly demonstrate your solution.
Suppose the linear demand curve for shirtsslopes downward and that consumers buy 500 shirts per yearwhen the price is $30 and 1,000 shirts per year when the priceis $25.a. Compared to the prices of $30 and $25, what can you sayabout the marginal valuation that consumers place on the300th shirt, the 700th shirt, and the 1,200th shirt they mightbuy each year?b. With diminishing marginal utility, are consumers derivingany consumer surplus if the price is $25 per shirt? Explain.c. Use a market demand curve to illustrate the change in consumersurplus if the price drops from $30 to $25.
Consider a town with a single street of 1 km long with 3,000 people spread uniformly along it. Two stores, 1 and 2, are located at the opposite ends of the street and sell the same product (store 1 is locatedattheleftend).Thecostofwalkingist1 =$6perkmtostore1andt2 =$9perkmtostore2for each consumer. The net utility of a consumer located at point x from buying a product at store 1 is U1(x) = 100 – p1 – t1x, where pi is a price of the product at store i = 1,2. The net utility from buying at store 2 is U2(x) = 100 – p2 – t2(1 – x). The average cost of the product for each store is c = 4. (a) Assume that all consumers buy product from the sellers. Find the demand functions Di(p1,p2) and the profit functions πi(p1,p2) for each store i = 1,2 as functions of prices p1,p2.(b) Find the equilibrium prices.