Service Quality is an important concept in service marketing. with regard to service quality measurement models / frameworks, however, extant research shows that there is no consensus on the appropriate measurement model. Provide motivation for this and perform an appraisal of any four service quality measurement models/ frameworks highlighting their distinctive features, streangths and weaknesses as well as which service context each one may be applicable. provide a report to management of any chosen firm on these issues.

Service Quality is an important concept in service marketing. with regard to service quality measurement models / frameworks, however, extant research shows that there is no consensus on the appropriate measurement model. Provide motivation for this and perform an appraisal of any four service quality measurement models/ frameworks highlighting their distinctive features, streangths and weaknesses as well as which service context each one may be applicable. provide a report to management of any chosen firm on these issues.

Marketing

20th Edition

ISBN:9780357033791

Author:Pride, William M

Publisher:Pride, William M

Chapter13: Services Marketing

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5DYMP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Under what conditions might a firm use multiple forecasting methods?
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?
Service quality is an important concept in service marketing. With regards to service quality measurement models / frameworks, however, extant research shows that there is no consensus on the appropriate measurement model. Provide a rationale for this and perform an appraisal of any four service quality measurement models/frameworks highlighting their distinctive features and commenting on the effectiveness of each one of them. Which one would be suited for which industry / sector and why?
The SCORE framework espoused in the article entitled "The Board's Role in Sustainability" recommends each of the following to achieve board-of-director buy-in of a company's sustainability initiatives, except: articulating a simple and clear statement of purpose. taking "ownership" of the company's stated purpose. basing compensation systems on metrics that reflect purpose, not just profits recognizing that ultimately the firm has a fiduciary responsibility to put shareholders' interests above all others.
What is quality? How do we determine quality? Differentiate goods from services. How are these related to service products? What are the different dimensions for service quality products? Identify at least 5 personalities who are pioneers of total quality management and service quality management. Discuss their significant contributions.
A company is choosing an outside firm to provide its payroll services. It has chosen four comparative categories of interest: client reviews, financial condition, IT capabilities, and government stability. These categories have been assigned weights of 20%, 10%, 40%, and 30%, respectively. Three potential providers were scored on each of those factors using a scale of 1-10, with a score of 1 meaning worst possible and 10 meaning best possible. Provider A Provider B Provider CClient reviews 2 6 10Financial condition 8 4 2IT capabilities 5 8 2Government stability 3 1 2In reference to the information provided discuss the relevance of the factor rating method in…
MTN Ghana operates different business portfolios in the mobile telephony market. As a consultant MTN Ghana. a. categorise the portfolio into four strategic business unit using a standard model. b. briefly explain the characteristics of each of the strategic business unit in terms of relative market share and Industry growth rate to the management of MTN Ghana.*Mid semester quiz*
The following are true statements about quality systems except: a. The FDA’s quality systems regulations are highly prescriptive and subject to limited interpretation b. Senior executives have ultimate legal responsibility for the effectiveness of the company’s quality system c. Companies can implement their quality systems in a progressive manner, focusing on those elements most relevant to their stage of growth d. Quality systems can be a source of competitive advantage for a company