Suppose that every driver faces a 4% probability of an automobile accident every year. An accident will, on average, cost each driver $5,000. Suppose there are two types of individuals: those with $30,000.00 in the bank and those with $2,500.00 in the bank. Assume that individuals with $2,500.00 in the bank declare bankruptcy if they get in an accident. In bankruptcy, creditors receive only what individuals have in the bank. Assume that both types of individuals are only slightly risk averse. In this scenario, the actuarially fair price of full insurance, in which all damages are paid by the insurance company, is $ Assume that the price of insurance is set at the actuarially fair price. At this price, drivers with $30,000.00 in the bank likely buy insurance, and those with $2,500.00 in the bank likely buy insurance. (Hint: For each type of driver, compare the price of insurance to the expected cost without insurance.) Suppose a state law has been passed forcing all individuals to purchase insurance at the actuarially fair price. True or False: The law will affect only the behavior of drivers with $2,500.00 in the bank. O False O True

Suppose that every driver faces a 4% probability of an automobile accident every year. An accident will, on average, cost each driver $5,000. Suppose there are two types of individuals: those with $30,000.00 in the bank and those with $2,500.00 in the bank. Assume that individuals with $2,500.00 in the bank declare bankruptcy if they get in an accident. In bankruptcy, creditors receive only what individuals have in the bank. Assume that both types of individuals are only slightly risk averse. In this scenario, the actuarially fair price of full insurance, in which all damages are paid by the insurance company, is $ Assume that the price of insurance is set at the actuarially fair price. At this price, drivers with $30,000.00 in the bank likely buy insurance, and those with $2,500.00 in the bank likely buy insurance. (Hint: For each type of driver, compare the price of insurance to the expected cost without insurance.) Suppose a state law has been passed forcing all individuals to purchase insurance at the actuarially fair price. True or False: The law will affect only the behavior of drivers with $2,500.00 in the bank. O False O True

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter7: Uncertainty

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 7.5P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

If a risk‐averse individual owns a home worth $100,000, and that individual iswilling to pay a maximum of $1,000 for an annual fire insurance policy that covers theentire loss in the event of a fire, then we know that:A. There is a one percent chance that the home will be destroyed by fire inthe next yearB. There is a greater than a one percent chance that the home will bedestroyed by fire in the next yearC. There is less than a one percent chance that the home will be destroyedby fire in the next yearD. None of the above is correct
Suppose Grace and Lisa are to go to dinner. Lisa is visiting Grace from outof town, and they are to meet at a local restaurant. When Lisa lived in town,they had two favorite restaurants: Bel Loc Diner and the Corner Stable. Ofcourse, Lisa’s information is out of date, but Grace knows which is betterthese days. Assume that the probability that the Bel Loc Diner is better isp > 1/2 and the probability that the Corner Stable is better is 1 - p. Naturedetermines which restaurant Grace thinks is better. Grace then sends amessage to Lisa, either “Let’s go to the Bel Loc Diner,” “Let’s go to theCorner Stable,” or “I don’t know [which is better].” Lisa receives the message, and then Grace and Lisa simultaneously decide which restaurant to go to. Payoffs are such that Grace and Lisa want to go to the same restaurant, but they prefer it to be the one that Grace thinks is better. More specifically, if, in fact, the Bel Loc Diner is better, then the payoffs from theiractions are as shown in the…
You are in the market for a used car. At a used carlot, you know that the Blue Book value of the car youare looking at is between $15,000 and $19,000. Ifyou believe the dealer knows as much about the caras you do, how much are you willing to pay? Why?Assume that you care only about the expected valueof the car you will buy and that the car values aresymmetrically distributed.23. Refer to Problem 22. Now you believe the dealerknows more about the car than you do. How muchare you willing to pay? Why? How can this asymmetric information problem be resolved in a competitivemarket?
Suppose every driver faces a 1.5% probability of an automobile accident every year, and on an average an accident will cost each driver $10,000. Suppose there are two types of individuals: those with $50,000 and those with $6,000 in the bank. Assume that individuals with $6,000 in the bank declare bankruptcy if they get in an accident. In the bankruptcy, creditors receive only what individuals have in the bank. What is the expected loss from an accident for individuals with $6,000 in the bank if they don’t buy comprehensive insurance coverage? a. $50,000.00 b. $6,000.00 c. $150.00 d. $90.00
Suppose that every driver faces a 2% probability of an automobile accident every year. An accident will, on average, cost each driver $5,000. Suppose there are two types of individuals: those with $30,000.00 in the bank and those with $1,250.00 in the bank. Assume that individuals with $1,250.00 in the bank declare bankruptcy if they get in an accident. In bankruptcy, creditors receive only what individuals have in the bank. Assume that both types of individuals are only slightly risk averse. In this scenario, the actuarially fair price of full insurance, in which all damages are paid by the insurance company, is . Assume that the price of insurance is set at the actuarially fair price. At this price, drivers with $1,250.00 in the bank likely buy insurance, and those with $30,000.00 in the bank likely buy insurance. (Hint: For each type of driver, compare the price of insurance to the expected cost without insurance.) Suppose a state law has been passed…
Microeconomics Wilfred’s expected utility function is px1^0.5+(1−p)x2^0.5, where p is the probability that he consumes x1 and 1 - p is the probability that he consumes x2. Wilfred is offered a choice between getting a sure payment of $Z or a lottery in which he receives $2500 with probability p = 0.4 and $3700 with probability 1 - p. Wilfred will choose the sure payment if Z > CE and the lottery if Z < CE, where the value of CE is equal to ___ (please round your final answer to two decimal places if necessary)
Question 4 Suppose a prosecutor expects to convict a defendant with probability 0.5 and that the sentence on conviction is 10 years in prison. Assume the prosecutor values prison time at $1,000 per year (its value as a deterrent of crime), and incurs a cost of trial equal to $2,000. a. What is the minimum prison sentence the prosecutor will o er as part of a plea bargain if her objective is to maximize the expected value of the sentence imposed, less the cost of trial (ignore the information provided in b. below to answer this question a.)? b. Suppose the defendant believes his chances of being convicted are 0.3, his cost of prison time is $5,000 per year, and his cost of a trial is $1,000. Will he accept the plea bargain in a.?
Suppose there exist n = 1000 firms that seek to gain access to a small niche market that is regulated. Suppose that one firm will obtain access and that will get that firm an additional R = $50,000 in profits. Each firm already receives $1 million in profits from other ventures. a. Suppose the probability of winning the rents is linear in investment, each firm has an equal chance of winning and they are all risk-neutral. How much will each firm invest in rent-seeking? Are the rents fully dissipated? b. Suppose instead that the probability of winning changes with the amount invested in rent-seeking, so that each firm’s odds of gaining access are π(n,I) = I1/2 /n. Is the probability of winning increasing or decreasing in investment? Are there diminishing returns to rent-seeking? c. How much will each firm invest in rent-seeking? Are the rents fully dissipated, less than fully dissipated, or more than fully dissipated?
Suppose we have 2 countries: Home and Foregin. Each has one asset: a banana tree. The bananas go bad after every month, so they cannot be saved. The prouction is as follows: {Home, Foreign} {200, 100} with probability 1/4. {100, 150} with probablity 3/4. A) What would be the expected yield for each country without trade? B) Countries can now trade shares of stock of any size. How much Foreign stocks will Home buy? How much stocks will Home trade in return?
2. Maria has $100. There is a 50% that she will lose all of it. Her utility as a functionof wealth is u(c) = √c. a. What is the maximum amount she would be willing to pay to fully insure againstthe 50% probability of the loss? b. Is she risk averse, risk loving, or risk neutral?
Suppose you must choose between the two prospects, (40,000, 0.025) or (1,000): The prospect of winning 40,000 with a probability of 2.5% or winning 1,000 with certainty. Suppose, too, that the following three graphs represent your utility function (according to expected utility theory) and your weighting and value scales (according to prospect theory). Finally, suppose that your current wealth is 20,000. d. Based on prospect theory, which prospect would you choose? Why? e. Why is your decision different under the two theories? (Hint: what is one of the common human traits that prospect theory captures that expected utility theory cannot?)
Prospect Y = ($6, 0.25 ; $15, 0.75) If Will's utility of wealth function is given by u(x)=x0.25, what is the value of CE(Y) for Will? (In other words, what is Will's certainty equivalent for prospect Y?) (The certainty equivalent represents the maximum amount a person would be willing to pay to acquire a risky prospect, and equivalently, the lowest price for which they would be willing to sell a risky prospect if they already owned it) (Note: The answer may not be a whole number; please round to the nearest hundredth) (Note: The numbers may change between questions, so read carefully)