Suppose that the annual rates of growth of real GDP of Econoland over a five-year period were sequentially as follows: 3 percent, 1 percent, −2 percent, 4 percent, and 5 percent. What was the average of these growth rates in Econoland over these five years? What term would economists use to describe what happened in year 3? If the growth rate in year 3 had been a positive 2 percent rather than a negative 2 percent, what would have been the average growth rate?

Suppose that the annual rates of growth of real GDP of Econoland over a five-year period were sequentially as follows: 3 percent, 1 percent, −2 percent, 4 percent, and 5 percent. What was the average of these growth rates in Econoland over these five years? What term would economists use to describe what happened in year 3? If the growth rate in year 3 had been a positive 2 percent rather than a negative 2 percent, what would have been the average growth rate?

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter20: Economic Growth

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 20RQ: For a high-income economy like the United States, what aggregate production function elements are...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose that the annual rates of growth of real GDP of Econoland over a five-year period were sequentially as follows: 3 percent, 1 percent, -2 percent, 4 percent, and 5 percent. What was the average of these growth rates in Econoland over these 5 years? What term would economists use to describe what happened in year 3?
Suppose that the annual rates of growth of real GDP in Econoland over a five-year period were as follows: Year Growth Rate (%) 1 4 2 2 3 -1 4 4 5 6 a. What was the average of these growth rates in Econoland over these five years? ________ percent b. What term would economists use to describe what happened in year 3? c. If the growth rate in year 3 had been a positive 4 percent rather than a negative 1 percent, what would have been Econoland's average growth rate over the five years? __________ percent
Consider a nation in which the volume of goods and services is growing by 5 percent per year. What is the likely impact of this high rate of growth on the power and influence of its government relative to other countries experiencing slower rates of growth? What about the effect of this 5 percent growth on the nation’s living standards? Will these also necessarily grow by 5 percent per year, given population growth? Why or why not?
A mathematical approximation called the rule of 70 tells us that the number of years that it will take something that is growing to double in size is approximately equal to the number 70 divided by its percentage rate of growth. Thus, if Mexico's real GDP per person is growing at 7 percent per year, it will take about 10 years ( =70/7) to double. Apply the rule of 70 to solve the following problem. Real GDP per person in Mexico in 2005 was about $ 11,000 per person, while it was about $ 44,000 per person in the United States. If real GDP per person in Mexico grows at the rate of 5 percent per year, about how long will it take Mexico's real GDP per person to reach the level that the United States was at in 2005? (Hint: How many times would Mexico's 2005 real GDP per person have to double to reach the United States' 2005 real GDP per person?)
In developed countries the phenomenon of population aging is happening because of longer life expectancy as well as lower birth rates and lower population growth rates. 1. Explain how the life-cycle theory can be used to deduce that while longer expected life increases individual and aggregate savings, a lower population growth rate may increase per capita saving in the short run but reduces it in the long run. 2. How does the LC theory suggest that immigration from developing countries maybe favorable for increasing aggregate consumption and savings in developed countries? In Pakistan there is currently a pensions crisis because the government did not plan pensions of public sector employees efficiently. Instead of raising funds from lifetime earnings of employees, and giving pensions as returns on savings, pensions currently require budgetary allocation in Pakistan, leading to financial burden on government. In developed countries like the US, where people plan their own…
In the graph of Figure I, the annual growth rate of the GDP of the United States economy is presented since the first quarter of 2004, while, in the graphs of Figure II, three different scenarios of the relationship are represented between demand and aggregate supply that reflect different situations of economic growth. 4. Explain in detail what is happening in Graph C of Figure II and, after examining the data in the graph of Figure I, identify in what period of time this situation is occurring. Figure I = Real data of the United States economyFigure 2 = Representation of the aggregate demand and supply modelDA = AGGREGATE DEMANDGDP = GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCTNGP = GENERAL PRICE LEVELOAL = LONG TERM AGGREGATED OFFEROAC = SHORT-TERM AGGREGATE OFFER
Consider an economy with a Cobb-Douglas production function with α = 1/3 that begins in steady state with a growth rate of technological progress of g of 2 percent. Consider what happens when g increases to 3 percent. (a) What is the growth rate of output per worker before the change? What happens to this growth rate in the long run? (b) Perform a growth accounting exercise for the economy, decomposing the growth rate in output per capita into components contributed by capital per capita growth and technology growth. What is the contribution of the change in g to output per capita growth according to this formula? (c) In what sense is the growth accounting result in part b producing a misleading picture of this experiment? Explain why this is the case.
16)A mathematical approximation called the rule of 70 tells us that the number of years that it will take something that is growing to double in size is approximately equal to the number 70 divided by its percentage rate of growth. Thus, if Mexico’s real GDP per person is growing at 7 percent per year, it will take about 10 years (= 70/7) to double. Apply the rule of 70 to solve the following problem. Real GDP per person in Mexico in 2005 was about $11,000 per person, while it was about $44,000 per person in the United States. If real GDP per person in Mexico grows at the rate of 4 percent per year, about how long will it take Mexico’s real GDP per person to reach the level that the United States was at in 2005? (Hint: How many times would Mexico’s 2005 real GDP per person have to double to reach the United States’ 2005 real GDP per person?) Instructions: Enter your answer as a whole number.
20 Macroeconomic Information for Mexico: 2020 Q2 GDP (in 2020 Q2 pesos) 4.97 trillion pesos 2020 Q1 GDP (in 2020 Q1 pesos) 6.09 trillion pesos 2020 Q2 GDP (in 2015 pesos) 3.76 trillion pesos 2020 Q1 GDP (in 2015 pesos) 4.54 trillion pesos Calculate Mexico's real GDP growth rate between the first and second quarters of 2020. (Enter your answer in percent form, rounded to one decimal place, without the percent sign. For example, if your answer is 0.12345, enter 12.3.) 21 Macroeconomic Information for Mexico: 2020 Q2 GDP (in 2020 Q2 pesos) 4.97 trillion pesos 2020 Q1 GDP (in 2020 Q1 pesos) 6.09 trillion pesos 2020 Q2 GDP (in 2015 pesos) 3.76 trillion pesos 2020 Q1 GDP (in 2015 pesos) 4.54 trillion pesos Calculate Mexico's inflation, using the GDP deflator method, between the first and second quarters of 2020. (Enter your answer in percent form, rounded to one decimal place, without the percent sign. For example, if your…
Which of the following is a true statement? Multiple Choice Economists who support economic growth say that it is the most practical route to the higher standards of living that the vast majority of people desire. Most economists believe that the recent rise in the average rate of productivity growth implies an end to the business cycle. Most economists believe that increases in real GDP actually produce decreases in overall economic well-being because of spillover costs. Mainstream economists disagree as to whether the rate of productivity growth was higher between 1995 and 2012 or between 1973 and 1995.
A mathematical approximation called the rule of 70 tells us how long it will take for something to double in size if it grows at a constant rate. The doubling time is approximately equal to the number 70 divided by the percentage rate of growth. Thus, if Panama’s real GDP per person is growing at 7 percent per year, it will take about 10 years (= 70/7) to double. Apply the rule of 70 to solve the following problem: Suppose that real GDP per person in Panama in 2017 was about $12,000 per person, while it was about $48,000 per person in the United States. If real GDP per person in Panama grows at the rate of 5 percent per year, about how long will it take Panama’s real GDP per person to reach the level that the United States was at in 2017? (Hint: How many times would Panama’s 2017 real GDP per person have to double to reach the United States’ 2017 real GDP per person?) __________ years
Let's assume that in a South American country, the nominal GDP went down by 1%, while, the price level went down by 5%. What is the real GDP growth rate during this period in percentages?