Suppose the Environmental Protection Agency is in the process of investigating Ozone Ruination Limited for possible environmental damage but has not proposed a penalty as of December 31, 2020, the company’s fiscal year-end. Describe the two-step process involved in deciding how this unasserted assessment should be reported.

Suppose the Environmental Protection Agency is in the process of investigating Ozone Ruination Limited for possible environmental damage but has not proposed a penalty as of December 31, 2020, the company’s fiscal year-end. Describe the two-step process involved in deciding how this unasserted assessment should be reported.

Individual Income Taxes

43rd Edition

ISBN:9780357109731

Author:Hoffman

Publisher:Hoffman

Chapter15: Property Transactions: Nontaxable Exchanges

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6RP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose the Environmental Protection Agency is in the process of investigating Ozone Ruination Limited forpossible environmental damage but has not proposed a penalty as of December 31, 2017, the company’s fiscalyear-end. Describe the two-step process involved in deciding how this unasserted assessment should be reported
Presented below is a note disclosure for Matsui Corporation. Litigation and Environmental: The Company has been notified, or is a named or a potentially responsible party in a number of governmental (federal, state and local) and private actions associated with environmental matters, such as those relating to hazardous wastes, including certain sites which are on the United States EPA National Priorities List (“Superfund”). These actions seek clean-up costs, penalties and/or damages for personal injury or to property or natural resources. In 2020, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $56,229,000, included in the “Other expense (income)—net” caption of the Company’s consolidated income statements, as an additional provision for environmental matters. These expenditures are expected to take place over the next several years and are indicative of the Company’s commitment to improve and maintain the environment in which it operates. At December 31, 2020, environmental accruals amounted…
On October 1, 2020, Washington Chemical was identified as a potentially responsible party by the Environmental Protection Agency. Washington Chemical’s management and its counsel have concluded that it is probable that Washington will be responsible for damages, and a reasonable estimate of these damages is $1,250,000. Washington Chemical’s insurance policy of $2,250,000 has a deductible clause of $125,000. How should Washington Chemical report this information in its financial statements at December 31, 2020?
Production at the Paint Company’s factory was halted for one day when a truck carrying dye used in the production process overturned in the Rio Bobre River causing the contamination to the water supply system in the area. The Environmental Agency is currently considering whether the release of dye was in breach of environmental legislation. The company’s insurers have not yet commented on the event. Assume that the date is now 20 December 2019, the financial statements and the audit report have just been signed and the report is to be presented to the Board of Directors on 10 January 2020. The Environmental Agency has issued a report stating that Paint Company is in breach of environmental legislation and a fine of $10.5M will now be levied on the company. The amount is material to the financial statements. Required: Explain the additional audit work the auditor should carry out in respect of this fine. The auditors are considering to modify their audit opinion. Do you agree or…
On December 15, 2023, an employee filed a lawsuit against Bojack Company for damages suffered when one of Bojack’s equipment malfunctioned in August of 2023. The legal counsel of the company believes that it is probable that Bojack will pay the following damages: Probability Estimated Litigation Cost 50% P400,000 30% 700,000 20% 550,000 Bojack Company provided a 10% risk adjustment factor. Using the expected value method, how much is the provision that should be recognized by Bojack Company on December 31, 2023?
Chaos Ltd. has been served a legal notice on December 15, 2019, by the local environmental protection agency (EPA) to fit smoke detectors in its factory on or before June 30, 2020. The cost of fitting smoke detectors in its factory is estimated at € 250,000. How should Chaos Ltd. treat this in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019?
In May of 2016, Raymond Financial Services became involved in a penalty dispute with the EPA. At December 31, 2016, the environmental attorney for Raymond indicated that an unfavorable outcome to the dispute was probable. The additional penalties were estimated to be $770,000 but could be as high as $1,170,000. After the year-end, but before the 2016 financial statements were issued, Raymond accepted an EPA settlement offer of $900,000. Raymond should have reported an accrued liability on its December 31, 2016, balance sheet of: a.$770,000. b.$900,000. c.$970,000. d.$1,170,000.
ABC Corporation a manufacturer of cleaning products is preparing annual financial statements at December 31, 2020. Because of a recently proven health hazard in one of its cleaning products, the PH government has clearly indicated its intention of having ABC recall all can of this paint sold in the last three months. The management of ABC estimates that this recall would cost P5,800,000. What accounting recognition, if any, should be accorded this situation?
Coronado Industries, a manufacturer of household paints, is preparing annual financial statements at December 31, 2020. Because of a recently proven health hazard in one of its paints, the government has clearly indicated its intention of having Coronado recall all cans of this paint sold in the last six months. The management of Coronado estimates that this recall would cost $ 810000. What accounting recognition, if any, should be accorded this situation? Appropriation of retained earnings of $ 810000 Operating expense of $ 810000 and liability of $ 810000 No recognition Note disclosure only
Presented below is a note disclosure for Matsui Corporation. Litigation and Environmental: The Company has been notified, or is a named or a potentially responsible party in a number of governmental (federal, state and local) and private actions associated with environmental matters, such as those relating to hazardous wastes, including certain sites which are on the United States EPA National Priorities List (“Superfund”). These actions seek clean-up costs, penalties and/or damages for personal injury or to property or natural resources. In 2017, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $56,229,000, included in the “Other expense (income)—net” caption of the Company’s consolidated income statements, as an additional provision for environmental matters. These expenditures are expected to take place over the next several years and are indicative of the Company’s commitment to improve and maintain the environment in which it operates. At December 31, 2017, environmental accruals amounted…
Dinoco Petroleum faces three potential contingency situations, described below. Dinoco’s fiscal year ends December 31, 2021, and it issues its 2021 financial statements on March 15, 2022. Required: Determine the appropriate means of reporting each situation for the year ended December 31, 2021, and record any necessary entries. Explain your reasoning. 1. In the initial trial, Dinoco lost a $130 million lawsuit resulting from a dispute with a supplier. The case is under appeal. Although Dinoco is unable to predict the outcome, it does not expect the case to have a material adverse effect on the company. 2. In November 2020, the state of Texas filed suit against Dinoco, seeking civil penalties and injunctive relief for violations of environmental laws regulating hazardous waste. On January 12, 2022, Dinoco reached a settlement with state authorities. Based upon discussions with legal counsel, it is probable that Dinoco will require $150 million to cover the cost of violations. 3. Dinoco…
On January 15, 2021, an explosion occurred at the Aizel Company plant causing extensive property damage to area buildings. By March 1, 2022, no claims hand been asserted against the entity but management and counsel concluded that it is likely that claims will be asserted and that it is reasonably possible that the entity will be responsible for damages. Management believed that P1,250,000 would be a reasonable estimate of the liability. The entity's P5,000,000 comprehensive public liability policy has a P250.000 deductible clause. The financial statements for 2021 were issued on March 31, 2022. What amount of loss from lawsuit should be reported in the income statement for 2021?