Team 2 plays A Team 2 plays B Team 2 plays C Team 1 plays A 9, 9 8, 12 6, 6 Team 1 plays B 6, 6 0, 7 5, 5 Team 1 plays C 12, 8 10, 10 7,0 Consider the simultaneous move game above in which two teams are competing against each other. Which of the following statements are true? In all Nash Equilibria of the game Team 2 plays B This game has two Nash Equilibria Team 1's best response to team 2 playing B is to play A. O None of the other answers are correct This game has a mixed strategy Nash Equilibria where a player randomizes over multiple options.

Team 2 plays A Team 2 plays B Team 2 plays C Team 1 plays A 9, 9 8, 12 6, 6 Team 1 plays B 6, 6 0, 7 5, 5 Team 1 plays C 12, 8 10, 10 7,0 Consider the simultaneous move game above in which two teams are competing against each other. Which of the following statements are true? In all Nash Equilibria of the game Team 2 plays B This game has two Nash Equilibria Team 1's best response to team 2 playing B is to play A. O None of the other answers are correct This game has a mixed strategy Nash Equilibria where a player randomizes over multiple options.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.9P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the following two-player game.First, player 1 selects a number x≥0. Player 2 observes x. Then, simultaneously andindependently, player 1 selects a number y1 and player 2 selects a number y2, at which pointthe game ends.Player 1’s payoff is: u1(x; y1) = −3y21 + 6y1y2 −13x2 + 8xPlayer 2’s payoff is: u2(y2) = 6y1y2 −6y22 + 12xy2Draw the game tree of this game and identify its Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium.
Consider the payoff matrix for a game depicted below. Player 1 selects the row and Player 2 selects the column. Up Down Left 1, -1 -1, 1 Right -1, 1 1, -1 What is (are) the Nash equilibrium (equilibria)? Question 18Answer a. Player 1 plays right; Player 2 plays down b. Player 1 plays left; Player 2 plays down c. Player 1 plays down; Player 2 plays left d. Player 1 plays right; Player 2 plays up e. Player 1 plays up; Player 2 plays left f. There is no Nash equilibrium g. Player 1 plays down; Player 2 plays right h. Player 1 plays up; Player 2 plays right i. Player 1 plays left; Player 2 plays up
. Find the Nash equilibrium of the following modified Rock-Paper-Scissors game: • When rock (R) beats scissors (S), the winner’s payoff is 10 and the loser’s payoff is −10. • When paper (P) beats rock, the winner’s payoff is 5 and the loser’s payoff is −5. • When scissors beats paper, the winner’s payoff is 2 and the loser’s payoff is −2. • In case of ties, both players receive 0 payoff. You are suposed to create a system of equations and then solve for them and find 3 probabilities- please show how to do that
UNIT 9 CHAPTER 5 In a gambling game, Player A and Player B both have a $1 and a $5 bill. Each player selects one of the bills without the other player knowing the bill selected. Simultaneously they both reveal the bills selected. If the bills do not match, Player A wins Player B's bill. If the bills match, Player B wins Player A's bill. Develop the game theory table for this game. The values should be expressed as the gains (or losses) for Player A. Is there a pure strategy? Why or why not? Determine the optimal strategies and the value of this game. Does the game favor one player over the other? Suppose Player B decides to deviate from the optimal strategy and begins playing each bill 50% of the time. What should Player A do to improve Player A’s winnings? Comment on why it is important to follow an optimal game theory strategy.
Jacob wants to rent out car from James. Jacob has a big passion for cars and enjoys speeding, so much that he often gets fined. Jacob receives £400 in utility from being able to speed on the road whereas James would like to avoid getting fined. If Jacob spreads don the road, it will cost James £700. Thus, James is considering charging Jacob a fine deposit of £700. a) Draw the extensive form of this principal-agent problem and use backward induction to solve for the Nash Equilibrium. b) Explain why this situation could be considered a principal-agent problem