The arm span and foot length were both measured (in centimeters) for each of 20 students in a biology class. The computer output displays the regression analysis. Predictor Coef SE Coef t-ratio Constant -7.611 2.567 0.186 0.035 2.965 0.046 Arm span - 5.377 0.000 S = 1.61 R-Sq 63.0% R-Sq (Adj) = 64.9% Which of the following is the best interpretation of the coefficient of determination 2? O About 37% of the variation in arm span is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the foot length. O About 65% of the variation in foot length is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the arm span. O About 63% of the variation in arm span is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the foot length. O About 63% of the variation in foot length is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the arm span.

College Algebra
7th Edition
ISBN:9781305115545
Author:James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Publisher:James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Chapter1: Equations And Graphs
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 10T: Olympic Pole Vault The graph in Figure 7 indicates that in recent years the winning Olympic men’s...
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Question
The arm span and foot length were both measured (in centimeters) for each of 20 students in a biology class. The
computer output displays the regression analysis.
Predictor
Coef SE Coef
t-ratio
Constant
Arm span
-7.611 2.567
2.965
0.046
0.186 0.035
5.377
0.000
S = 1.61
R-Sq = 63.08
R-Sq (Adj) = 64.98
Which of the following is the best interpretation of the coefficient of determination 2?
O About 37% of the variation in arm span is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the foot length.
O About 65% of the variation in foot length is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the arm span.
O About 63% of the variation in arm span is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the foot length.
O About 63% of the variation in foot length is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the arm span.
Transcribed Image Text:The arm span and foot length were both measured (in centimeters) for each of 20 students in a biology class. The computer output displays the regression analysis. Predictor Coef SE Coef t-ratio Constant Arm span -7.611 2.567 2.965 0.046 0.186 0.035 5.377 0.000 S = 1.61 R-Sq = 63.08 R-Sq (Adj) = 64.98 Which of the following is the best interpretation of the coefficient of determination 2? O About 37% of the variation in arm span is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the foot length. O About 65% of the variation in foot length is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the arm span. O About 63% of the variation in arm span is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the foot length. O About 63% of the variation in foot length is accounted for by the linear relationship formed with the arm span.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Correlation, Regression, and Association
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
College Algebra
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305115545
Author:
James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463247
Author:
David Poole
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill