The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 16%. A warden suspects that this percent is higher if thesex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 378 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 72 ofthem became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a =0.10 level of significance?a. For this study, we should use Select an answerb. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:Ho: ? v Select an answer(please enter a decimal)H1:? v Select an answer(Please enter a decimal)c. The test statistic ? v =(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)d. The p-value(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)e. The p-value is ? v af. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis.g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 16% at a = 0.10, sothere is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion ofconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 16%.The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 16% at a = 0.10, sothere is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion ofconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 16%.O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly higher than 16% at a = 0.10, sothere is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion ofconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 16%. h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeatoffenders is 16% and if another 378 convicted sex offender drug addicts are surveyed thenthere would be a 5.3% chance that more than 19% of the 378 convicted sex offender drugaddicts in the study will become repeat offenders.O If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offendersis 19% and if another 378 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there wouldbe a 5.3% chance of concluding that more than 16% of all convicted sex offender drug addictsbecome repeat offenders.There is a 5.3% chance of a Type I error.There is a 5.3% chance that more than 16% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts becomerepeat offenders.i. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeatoffenders is 16% and if another 378 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, thenthere would be a 10% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion ofall convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 16%.There is a 10% chance that Lizard People aka "Reptilians" are running the world.O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeatoffenders is higher than 16% and if another 378 convicted sex offender drug addicts areobserved then there would be a 10% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that theproportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to16%.There is a 10% chance that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts whobecome repeat offenders is higher than 16%.

Question

The recidivism rate for convicted sex offenders is 16%. A warden suspects that this percent is higher if thesex offender is also a drug addict. Of the 378 convicted sex offenders who were also drug addicts, 72 ofthem became repeat offenders. What can be concluded at the a =0.10 level of significance?a. For this study, we should use Select an answerb. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:Ho: ? v Select an answer(please enter a decimal)H1:? v Select an answer(Please enter a decimal)c. The test statistic ? v =(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)d. The p-value(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)e. The p-value is ? v af. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis.g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 16% at a = 0.10, sothere is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion ofconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to 16%.The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly higher than 16% at a = 0.10, sothere is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population proportion ofconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 16%.O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly higher than 16% at a = 0.10, sothere is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion ofconvicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 16%. h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeatoffenders is 16% and if another 378 convicted sex offender drug addicts are surveyed thenthere would be a 5.3% chance that more than 19% of the 378 convicted sex offender drugaddicts in the study will become repeat offenders.O If the sample proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offendersis 19% and if another 378 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed then there wouldbe a 5.3% chance of concluding that more than 16% of all convicted sex offender drug addictsbecome repeat offenders.There is a 5.3% chance of a Type I error.There is a 5.3% chance that more than 16% of all convicted sex offender drug addicts becomerepeat offenders.i. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeatoffenders is 16% and if another 378 convicted sex offender drug addicts are observed, thenthere would be a 10% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion ofall convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is higher than 16%.There is a 10% chance that Lizard People aka &#34;Reptilians&#34; are running the world.O If the population proportion of convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeatoffenders is higher than 16% and if another 378 convicted sex offender drug addicts areobserved then there would be a 10% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that theproportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts who become repeat offenders is equal to16%.There is a 10% chance that the proportion of all convicted sex offender drug addicts whobecome repeat offenders is higher than 16%.

Accepted Answer

Given :
x = 72
n = 378
p^ = xn
p^ = 72378
p^ = 0.191
α = 0.1
a)
For this study, we should use…