There have been suggestions that the "work ethic" in the U.S. has declined. The claim is that, as a result, people are choosing to work fewer hours (at a given wage rate and level of unearned income) than did individuals in the past. This can be indicated by changes in individuals' indifference curves. Show such a change in indifference curves on graph with the consumption good on the Y-axis and leisure on the X-axis. How does the slope of the indifference curve change at a given level of leisure? (It may be useful to draw a simple budget constraint to indicate the change in hours of work.)

There have been suggestions that the "work ethic" in the U.S. has declined. The claim is that, as a result, people are choosing to work fewer hours (at a given wage rate and level of unearned income) than did individuals in the past. This can be indicated by changes in individuals' indifference curves. Show such a change in indifference curves on graph with the consumption good on the Y-axis and leisure on the X-axis. How does the slope of the indifference curve change at a given level of leisure? (It may be useful to draw a simple budget constraint to indicate the change in hours of work.)

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter16: Labor Markets

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 16.11P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

This question will analyze the impact on a person's labour supply from a shock to their partner's job. Assume leisure is a normal good. Let's assume Vanessa has a wage rate of $20 per hour. Recently her partner, Bill, had to take a wage cut at work, with his wage falling from $45 per hour to $30 per hour, but allowed them to continue working 40 hours per week. Analyze the decision of the household over choice consumption and Vanessa's leisure, taking Bill's hours as given (constant).
How would you demonstrate part b) diagramatically 6. Assume you can work as many hours you wish at £12 per hour (net of tax). If you do not work, you have no income. You have no ability to borrow or lend, so your consumption, c, is simply equal to your income. a) Derive and plot the feasible set, between daily values of consumption c, and “leisure”, l. Label the values at the intercepts (the points where the feasible frontier cuts the two axes). b) Assume that your optimal choice of consumption and leisure is to work 8 hours per day. Illustrate this choice diagrammatically using the feasible set and indifference curves.
(i) Keith’s marginal utility of leisure is C – 20 and his marginal utility of consumption is L – 50. There are 110 hours in the week available to split between work and leisure. Keith receives £250 of welfare payments each week regardless of how much he works (assume he spends all of his welfare payments on consumption). What is Keith’s reservation wage? (ii) Suppose Danny receives the same welfare payments each week as Keith and has the same number of available hours (110). However, Danny’s indifference curve is flatter than Keith’s. How would his reservation wage compare to Keith’s? Why?
Refer to the labor–leisure budget constraint shown to answer the questions. This curve shows trade-offs between income and leisure that must be made over the course of one day. How much does this person earn per hour? $ At point A, how many hours of labor are selected? hourshours At point A, how many hours of leisure are selected? hours
Follow up question g. Explain why the utility curves cannot be drawn so as to induce the worker to work between L1 and L2 hours. h Yelowitz (1995) studies a Medicaid reform measure that reduced the Medicaid work disincentive. One of the reforms he studied raised the Medicaid eligibility threshold income level by 33%. Draw a new version of the fifigure with a new labor–income curve that reflflects this change. Explain how this change might induce someone currently working L1 hours per year to work more, and be sure to draw indifffference curves to support your answer.
Labor-Leisure choice. Uses 80 hour maximum work week. Utility = R3C2 R = leisure C = dollar amount of income for consumption Budget Line 1: Wage = $16 per hour. No other income. Draw the Labor-Leisure diagram, including the budget line. Solve the point of optimization, and label it point A. Draw the indifference curve. Label it U1 Budget Line 2: Wage = $22 per hour. No other income. Draw the budget line for this new $22 wage. Solve the point of optimization, and label it point B. Draw the indifference curve. Label it U3 Use an auxiliary budget line to separate the income effect from the substitution effect. Identify the substitution effect as point S. Draw the indifference curve. Label it U2 The point of optimization for part C can be labeled, rather than numerically solved, as long as the drawn answers show expected results for two normal goods.
Q1: Suppose Labor and Capital are substitutes and the price of capital falls. All else equal, we should expect the labor select (supply, demand) Curve shift select ( up to the right, down to the left ) and for equilibrium wages to select (rise, fall) Q2: An individual has a utility function over Leisure and Income such that ?=?1/2?1/2 This individual has a budget constraint ?=?⋅(24−?)+? The best possible wage this individual can earn in the labor market is $2 per hour. This individual is $30 in debt (they have negative non-labor income). If this individual is earning a utility level of 4, which of the following are true? Group of answer choices The worker could be supplying 1 unit of Labor The worker could be earning $10 The worker could be supplying 8 units of labor The worker is maximizing their utility given their budget The worker's Marginal Rate of Substitution at the point where the budget constraint intersects the indifference curve is equal to -2
d. Based on both the consumption-leisure optimality condition obtained in previous part (Based on both of the two first-order conditions, construct the consumption-leisure optimality condition) and on the budget constraint, qualitatively sketch two things in a diagram with the real wage on the vertical axis and labor on the horizontal axis. First, the general shape of the relationship between w and n (perfectly vertical, perfectly horizontal, upward-sloping, downward-sloping, or impossible to tell). Second, how changes. in / affect the relationship (shift it outward, shift it inward, or impossible to deter mine). Briefly describe the economics of how you obtained your conclusions.
Suppose a person can work up to 80 hours per week at a pre-tax wage of $20 per hour but faces a constant 20% payroll tax. Assume that under these conditions the person maximizes utility by choosing to work 50 hours each week. The government proposes a negative income tax so that everyone receives $300 per week regardless of how much they work. To pay for the negative income tax, the payroll tax would be increased to 50%. Using the labor-leisure model, graphically show whether a person would be better off if the negative income tax is adopted and indicate whether hours worked increases or decreases due to the policy.
The __________ is the belief that work is an obligation and that capital should be reinvested for further profits ratherthan used for immediate enjoyment.
q7- When leisure is a normal good, the income effect from an increase in wages is manifest in a(n): Select one: a. desire to consume less leisure b. a change in preferences c. desire to consume more leisure d. a shift inwards of the budget constraint
How would you demonstrate part c) diagramatically 6. Assume you can work as many hours you wish at £12 per hour (net of tax). If you do not work, you have no income. You have no ability to borrow or lend, so your consumption, c, is simply equal to your income. b) Assume that your optimal choice of consumption and leisure is to work 8 hours per day. Illustrate this choice diagrammatically using the feasible set and indifference curves. c) Use indifference curves and the feasible set to show why, given the properties of the optimal choice in part b), it is not optimal to work, say, 10, or 6 hours per day.