This question will analyze the impact on a person's labour supply from a shock to their partner's job. Assume leisure is a normal good. Let's assume Vanessa has a wage rate of $20 per hour. Recently her partner, Bill, had to take a wage cut at work, with his wage falling from $45 per hour to $30 per hour, but allowed them to continue working 40 hours per week. Analyze the decision of the household over choice consumption and Vanessa's leisure, taking Bill's hours as given (constant).

This question will analyze the impact on a person's labour supply from a shock to their partner's job. Assume leisure is a normal good. Let's assume Vanessa has a wage rate of $20 per hour. Recently her partner, Bill, had to take a wage cut at work, with his wage falling from $45 per hour to $30 per hour, but allowed them to continue working 40 hours per week. Analyze the decision of the household over choice consumption and Vanessa's leisure, taking Bill's hours as given (constant).

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter16: Labor Markets

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 16.2P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose a person can work up to 80 hours per week at a pre-tax wage of $20 per hour but faces a constant 20% payroll tax. Assume that under these conditions the person maximizes utility by choosing to work 50 hours each week. The government proposes a negative income tax so that everyone receives $300 per week regardless of how much they work. To pay for the negative income tax, the payroll tax would be increased to 50%. Using the labor-leisure model, graphically show whether a person would be better off if the negative income tax is adopted and indicate whether hours worked increases or decreases due to the policy.
Consider the problem of a consumer who chooses between consuming goods and enjoying leisure in the current and future periods. Denote the consumption and leisure in the current period as C and l, and the consumption and leisure in the future period as C′ and l′, respectively. The preference is summarized by the following utility function: U(C,C′,l,l′)=lnC+ψlnl+β(lnC′ +ψlnl′). This individual is endowed with h units of time in each period. Wage rate per unit of labour time is w and w′ in the current and future period. In addition, the consumer receives profit transfer π and π′ and pays lump-sum taxes T and T′ in the current and future periods. Denote the saving in the current period as Sp. Answer the following questions. Derive the life-time budget constraint of this consumer. Set up the consumer’s problem. Solve for consumption (C and C′), leisure (l and l′), and saving (Sp). How does an increase in wage rate w affect C, Sp, and l?
Determine whether the following statements are true, false, or uncertain. Please illustrate and explain your answer. If leisure is a normal good, then an individual's labor supply curve must be positively sloped. If leisure is an inferior good, then an individual's labor supply curve must be negatively sloped.
A worker has 110 hours available in a week that can be used for leisure (L) or work (h). The utility function is U = (1 - α)ln(C) + α ln(L), where C is consumption. a) The price per unit of consumption is 1, the hourly wage is w, and the worker has a non-labor income of V. Show that the labor supply is: h* = (110(1-a)- (av)/w). Also, find the demand for consumption and leisure. b) What is the effect on labor supply of i) an increase in the hourly wage and ii) an increase in non-labor income? c) Set α = ½. What are C, L, and h when w = 200 and V = 10000? What is the reservation wage? d) What is the effect on labor supply of i) a 30% income tax and ii) a 10% wealth tax (on V)? e) What is the labor supply if V increases to 11600? f) An increase in V to 11600 gives the worker the same utility as w = 250 and V = 10000 (you do not need to show it). What are the income, substitution, and total effects on labor supply of an increase in wage from 200 to 250 while V remains at 10000?…
In the theory of consumer, we argued that the utility is ordinal, that is, utility number does not have any intrinsic meaning other than to give a preference ordering among consumption bundles. In other words, any increasing monotone transformation of a utility function represents the same preference, hence the spacing between indifference curves does not have any significance. Explain why in the theory of producer, the production function and the corresponding isoquant is a cardinal property, that is, the number itself has an intrinsic meaning. And explain the relationship between returns to scale and space between isoquants.
Illustrate (using a labor-leisure choice diagram) how a firm may induce a typical employee to lengthen his work week voluntarily by paying him premium wage rates for overtime hours.
What is two factors that may influence the shape of individuals’ indifference curves (flat or steep) which reflect their preferences for work or leisure? What is the difference between income effect and substitution effect under the basic work-leisure decision model?
Follow up question g. Explain why the utility curves cannot be drawn so as to induce the worker to work between L1 and L2 hours. h Yelowitz (1995) studies a Medicaid reform measure that reduced the Medicaid work disincentive. One of the reforms he studied raised the Medicaid eligibility threshold income level by 33%. Draw a new version of the fifigure with a new labor–income curve that reflflects this change. Explain how this change might induce someone currently working L1 hours per year to work more, and be sure to draw indifffference curves to support your answer.
Q1: Suppose Labor and Capital are substitutes and the price of capital falls. All else equal, we should expect the labor select (supply, demand) Curve shift select ( up to the right, down to the left ) and for equilibrium wages to select (rise, fall) Q2: An individual has a utility function over Leisure and Income such that ?=?1/2?1/2 This individual has a budget constraint ?=?⋅(24−?)+? The best possible wage this individual can earn in the labor market is $2 per hour. This individual is $30 in debt (they have negative non-labor income). If this individual is earning a utility level of 4, which of the following are true? Group of answer choices The worker could be supplying 1 unit of Labor The worker could be earning $10 The worker could be supplying 8 units of labor The worker is maximizing their utility given their budget The worker's Marginal Rate of Substitution at the point where the budget constraint intersects the indifference curve is equal to -2
The weekly preferences over consumption (C) and leisure(L) are defined by u(C, L) = √C + 3√L. The person receives a weekly allowance of m from The hourly wage is $18 per hour, and the person can work up to50 hours each week (T = z + L = 50), where z is the number of hours spent working). a)How many hours will the person work if her allowance is m= $450 per week b) What is the smallest allowance m for which the person will stopworking altogether (z∗ = 0) for a wage of w = 18?
An individual's decision to supply her labor or to spend her time in leisure activity is known as the labor-leisure tradeoff. True or false?
Joko is a university student, working part-time at copying service center for Rp. 8/hour with zero non-labor income. (a) Graph Joko’s budget constraint and label the utility-maximing outcome if Joko opts to work 40 hours per week. (b) Suppose Joko’s parents decide to send him Rp.100/week. Graph Joko’s new budget constraint. (c) How many hours will Joko now have to work to maintain the same weekly income as in (a)?