The Wall Street Journal Corporate Perceptions Study 2011 surveyed readers and asked how each rated the quality of management and the reputation of the company for over 250 worldwide corporations. Both the quality of management and the reputation of the company were rated on an excellent, good, and fair categorical scale. Assume the sample data for 200 respondents below applies to this study. Quality of Management Reputation of Company               Excellent Good Fair Excellent 40 25 5 Good 35 28 10 Fair 25 17 15 (a) Use a 0.05 level of significance and test for independence of the quality of management and the reputation of the company. State the null and alternative hypotheses. H0: Quality of management is not independent of the reputation of the company. Ha: Quality of management is independent of the reputation of the company.   H0: Quality of management is independent of the reputation of the company. Ha: Quality of management is not independent of the reputation of the company.       H0: Quality of management is not independent of the reputation of the company. Ha: The proportion of companies with excellent management is not equal across companies with differing reputations.   H0: Quality of management is independent of the reputation of the company. Ha: The proportion of companies with excellent management is equal across companies with differing reputations. Find the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)   Find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) p-value =  State your conclusion. Reject H0. We conclude that the rating for the quality of management is independent of the rating for the reputation of the company. Do not reject H0. We cannot conclude that the rating for the quality of management is independent of the rating of the reputation of the company.     Do not reject H0. We cannot conclude that the ratings for the quality of management and the reputation of the company are not independent. Reject H0. We conclude that the rating for the quality of management is not independent of the rating for the reputation of the company.

Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition 2012
1st Edition
ISBN:9780547587776
Author:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Chapter11: Data Analysis And Probability
Section11.4: Collecting Data
Problem 3E
icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question
The Wall Street Journal Corporate Perceptions Study 2011 surveyed readers and asked how each rated the quality of management and the reputation of the company for over 250 worldwide corporations. Both the quality of management and the reputation of the company were rated on an excellent, good, and fair categorical scale. Assume the sample data for 200 respondents below applies to this study.
Quality of Management Reputation of Company    
       
  Excellent Good Fair
Excellent 40 25 5
Good 35 28 10
Fair 25 17 15
(a)
Use a 0.05 level of significance and test for independence of the quality of management and the reputation of the company.
State the null and alternative hypotheses.
H0: Quality of management is not independent of the reputation of the company.
Ha: Quality of management is independent of the reputation of the company.
 
H0: Quality of management is independent of the reputation of the company.
Ha: Quality of management is not independent of the reputation of the company.    
 
H0: Quality of management is not independent of the reputation of the company.
Ha: The proportion of companies with excellent management is not equal across companies with differing reputations.
 
H0: Quality of management is independent of the reputation of the company.
Ha: The proportion of companies with excellent management is equal across companies with differing reputations.
Find the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
 
Find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
p-value = 
State your conclusion.
Reject H0. We conclude that the rating for the quality of management is independent of the rating for the reputation of the company.
Do not reject H0. We cannot conclude that the rating for the quality of management is independent of the rating of the reputation of the company.    
Do not reject H0. We cannot conclude that the ratings for the quality of management and the reputation of the company are not independent.
Reject H0. We conclude that the rating for the quality of management is not independent of the rating for the reputation of the company.
(b)
If there is a dependence or association between the two ratings, discuss and use probabilities to justify your answer.
For companies with an excellent reputation, the largest column probability corresponds to  ---Select--- excellent good fair management quality. For companies with a good reputation, the largest column probability corresponds to  ---Select--- excellent good fair management quality. For companies with a fair reputation, the largest column probability corresponds to  ---Select--- excellent good fair management quality. Since these highest probabilities correspond to  ---Select--- different or the same ratings of quality of management and reputation, the two ratings are  ---Select--- independent associated .
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Proportions
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
College Algebra
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781938168383
Author:
Jay Abramson
Publisher:
OpenStax
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning