We have studied the 2-period alternating offer bargaining model with constant costs of delay. In other words, in that model, there were two agents 1 and 2 , each with a constant delay cost c1 and c2 respectively. That is the cost to each player i of each period of delay is ci . Now consider the 3 -period version of the model. In this model there are 3 periods t = 0, 1, 2 . As before the cost of each additional period of delay is ci to player i, i.e., if the period t = 2 proposal z = (z1, z2) is accepted then player i’s payoff is zi − 2ci and if the period t = 2 proposal is rejected, then it is (−2c1, −2c2). Assume c1 > c2. Find a SPE of the game?

We have studied the 2-period alternating offer bargaining model with constant costs of delay. In other words, in that model, there were two agents 1 and 2 , each with a constant delay cost c1 and c2 respectively. That is the cost to each player i of each period of delay is ci . Now consider the 3 -period version of the model. In this model there are 3 periods t = 0, 1, 2 . As before the cost of each additional period of delay is ci to player i, i.e., if the period t = 2 proposal z = (z1, z2) is accepted then player i’s payoff is zi − 2ci and if the period t = 2 proposal is rejected, then it is (−2c1, −2c2). Assume c1 > c2. Find a SPE of the game?

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.8P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider a Common Value auction with two bidders who both receive a signal X that is uniformly distributed between 0 and 1. The (common) value V of the good the players are bidding for is the average of the two signals, i.e. V = (X1+X2)/2. Compute the symmetric Nash equilibrium bidding strategy for the second-price sealed-bid auction assuming that players are risk-neutral and have standard selfish preferences. Furthermore, you may assume that the other bidder is following a linear bidding strategy. Make sure to explain your notation and the steps you take to derive the result.
TRADE. Consider a bilateral trade model with two-sided asymmetric information. The buyer's value is private information to the buyer, vB and the seller's value vs is private information to the seller. (a)Derive the linear Bayes Nash Equilibrium in a double auction. (b)Assume that the seller can credibly disclose their valuae. What is your intuition, would he want to commit to such transparency?
Consider a sealed-bid auction in which the seller draws one of the N bids at random. The buyer whose bid was drawn wins the auction and pays the amount bid. Assume that buyer valuations follow a uniform(0,1) distribution. 1. What is the symmetric equilibrium bidding strategy b(v)?2. What is the seller’s expected revenue?3. Why doesn’t this auction pay the seller the same revenue as the four standard auctions? That is, why doesn’t the revenue equivalence theorem apply here?
Q56 A Nash equilibrium is an outcome... a. Achieved by cooperation between players in the game. b. That is achieved by collusion where no party has an incentive to change their behaviour. c. Where each player's strategy depends on the behaviour of its opponents. d. That is achieved when players in the game have jointly maximized profits and divided those profits according to market share of each player. e. Where each player's best strategy is to maintain its present behaviour given the present behaviour of the other players.
Which of the following is FALSE for the grim trigger strategy and the infinite horizon repeated Prisoner's Dilemma game illustrated above? A. In the grim trigger strategy profile, if a player chooses D in a period, then both players chooses D forever after that period B. The threshold discount factor for sustaining cooperation under grim trigger strategy depends on the utility numbers in the stage game C. If all utility numbers remain the same but 3 is replaced by 5 in the stage game, then cooperation CANNOT be sustained in this game for all possible values of the discount factor.
Consider a Common Value auction with two bidders who both receive a signal X that is uniformly distributed between 0 and 1. The (common) value V of the good the players are bidding for is the average of the two signals, i.e. V = (X1+X2)/2. the symmetric Nash equilibrium bidding strategy for the second-price sealed-bid auction assuming that players are risk-neutral and have standard selfish preferences. Furthermore, you may assume that the other bidder is following a linear bidding strategy. Make sure to explain your notation and the steps you take to derive the result.
Consider the infinitely repeated version of the symmetric two-player stagegame in the following figure. The first number in a cell is player 1’s singleperiod payoff. Assume that past actions are common knowledge. Each player’s payoff is the present value of the stream of single-period payoffs, where the discount factor is δi for player i.a. Define a grim-trigger strategy profile.b. Derive conditions whereby the strategy profile in (a) is a SPNE.
Consider the game of Chicken in which each player has the option to “get out of the way” and “hang tough” with payoffs: Get out of the way Hang tough Get out of the way 2,2 1,3 Hang tough 3,1 00 a. Find all pure strategy Nash equilibria, if they exist b. Let k be the probability that player 1 chooses “hang tough” and u be the probability that player two chooses “hang tough.” Find the mixed stragety Nash equilibria, if they exist
The mixed stratergy nash equalibrium consists of : the probability of firm A selecting October is 0.692 and probability of firm A selecting December is 0.309. The probability of firm B selecting October is 0.5 and probability of firm selecting December is 0.5. In the equilibrium you calculated above, what is the probability that both consoles are released in October? In December? What are the expected payoffs of firm A and of firm B in equilibrium?
Consider the two-player game: a. Find the strategies that are consistent with both players being rationaland each player believing the other player is rational.b. In addition to that assumed in part (a), assume that player 2 knows player1 knows player 2 is rational. Find strategies consistent with these beliefs.
Find all NE of the stage game.(b) Consider a two-period game without discounting in which the stage game is played ineach period. Find all pure strategy SPNE.(c) What’s the min-max payoff of each player?(c1) Consider pure strategies only.(c2) Consider all strategies, including the mixed ones.(d) Now suppose the stage game is repeated infinitely many times. Use the Fudenberg-Maskin Folk theorem to find all possible values of payoff that can be supported as aSPNE.
Consider the “trust game” discussed in class. The first player starts with a $100 endowment and chooses how much to give to the second player. The gift triples in value (i.e. if $20 is given, the second player receives $60). The second player then chooses how much to give back. The first player receives exactly how much is returned (i.e. if $40 is returned, the first player receives $40). The Nash equilibrium of the game is: Group of answer choices: -First player gives $100, second player returns nothing. -First player gives $50, second player returns $50. -First player gives $100, second player returns $300. -There is no Nash equilibrium of this game. -First player gives nothing, second player returns nothing.