1. Your friend has a strong opinion on cars: he either likes a car or doesnot like it at all. We have collected the following training data abouthis preferences using the featuresColor taking values: Red, Yellow;|Type taking values: Sports, SUV;Origin taking values: Domestic, Imported.NocolorlikesoriginSports DomesticSports DomesticSports Domestictype1RedYesRedNoRedYes4Yellow Sports DomesticNoYellow Sports Imported YesImported NoImported Yes6.Yellow SUVYellow SUV8Yellow SUVDomesticNoImported NoSports Imported9.RedSUV10RedUse a naive Bayes' classifier to predict whether your friend likes a RedDomestic SUV. Explain your computation in detail.

please find the explanation below.

Your friend has a strong opinion on cars: he either likes a car or does not like it at all. We have collected the following training data about his preferences using the features Color taking values: Red, Yellow; Type taking values: Sports, SUV; Origin taking values: Domestic, Imported. No color likes origin Sports Domestic Yes Sports Domestic No Sports Domestic Yes Yellow Sports Domestic No Yellow Sports Imported Yes Imported No Imported Yes Domestic No Imported No Sports | Imported Yes type 1 Red 2 Red 3 Red 4 5 6 Yellow SUV Yellow SUV 8 Yellow SUV 9. Red SUV 10 Red Use a naive Bayes' classifier to predict whether your friend likes a Red Domestic SUV. Explain your computation in detail.

Your friend has a strong opinion on cars: he either likes a car or does not like it at all. We have collected the following training data about his preferences using the features Color taking values: Red, Yellow; Type taking values: Sports, SUV; Origin taking values: Domestic, Imported. No color likes origin Sports Domestic Yes Sports Domestic No Sports Domestic Yes Yellow Sports Domestic No Yellow Sports Imported Yes Imported No Imported Yes Domestic No Imported No Sports | Imported Yes type 1 Red 2 Red 3 Red 4 5 6 Yellow SUV Yellow SUV 8 Yellow SUV 9. Red SUV 10 Red Use a naive Bayes' classifier to predict whether your friend likes a Red Domestic SUV. Explain your computation in detail.

Principles of Microeconomics

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305156050

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter22: Frontiers Of Microeconomics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Review the numbers for Canada and Venezuelafrom Table 33.12 which describes how many barrelsof oil and tons of lumber the workers can produce. Usethese numbers to answer the rest of this question.a. Draw a production possibilities frontier for eachcountry. Assume there are 100 workers in eachcountry. Canadians and Venezuelans desire bothoil and lumber. Canadians want at least 2,000tons of lumber. Mark a point on their productionpossibilities where they can get at least 3,000tons.b. Assume that the Canadians specializecompletely because they figured out they havea comparative advantage in lumber. They arewilling to give up 1,000 tons of lumber. Howmuch oil should they ask for in return for thislumber to be as well off as they were with notrade? How much should they ask for if theywant to gain from trading with Venezuela? Note:We can think of this “ask” as the relative price ortrade price of lumber.c. Is the Canadian “ask” you identified in (b) alsobeneficial for Venezuelans? Use the…
1. Write down an exchange economy model with two individuals and two goods, in whichthere is no consumption externality. State and explain the key assumptions of the model.Using the model, answer the following questions:(a) Explain carefully how the concept of Pareto efficiency differs from that of socialwelfare.(b) State the Second Theorem of Welfare Economics and explain carefully why it holds.What is the importance of the assumption of convex preferences to this theorem?(c) Explain the concept of the utility possibility frontier. What is the role of the utilitypossibility frontier in the social welfare maximization problem of a welfarist society?
1. Write down an exchange economy model with two individuals and two goods, in whichthere is no consumption externality. State and explain the key assumptions of the model.Using the model, answer the following questions:(a) Explain carefully how the concept of Pareto efficiency differs from that of socialwelfare.(b) State the Second Theorem of Welfare Economics and explain carefully why it holds.What is the importance of the assumption of convex preferences to this theorem?
What are four responses to the claim that people should not behave in the way described in this chapter?
During the Second World War, Germanys factories were decimated. It also suffered many human casualties, both soldiers and civilians. How did the war affect Germanys production possibilities curve?
If an economy can produce various combinationsof food and shelter along a productionpossibilities curve (PPC), then if we increase theproduction of shelter along the PPC, which ofthe following is true?a. We also increase the production of food.b. We must decrease the production of food.This forgone food production representsthe opportunity cost of the increase inshelter.c. We cannot change the production of food.d. The concept of opportunity cost does notapply along PPC.
Need help with this homework thinking question (about opportunity costs) Sigmund Freud, in his 1930 essay Civilization and Its Discontents, argues that thesublimation of sexual desire leads to the mental energy required for advances in civiliza-tion: science, art, politics, etc. He writes,“Sublimation of instinct [such as sexual instinct] is an especially conspicu-ous feature of cultural development; it is what makes it possible for higherpsychical activities, scientific, artistic, or ideological, to play such an impor-tant part in civilized life... it is impossible to overlook the extent to whichcivilization is built up upon a renunciation of instinct...” How would an economist phrase Freud’s argument, in terms of opportunity costs? Might this explain the development of monogamous marriage as an institution?
You just got a job in Washington, D.C. You moveinto an apartment with some acquaintances. All yourroommates, however, are slackers and do not clean upafter themselves. You, on the other hand, can clean fasterthan each of them. You determine that you are 70%faster at dishes and 10% faster with vacuuming. All ofthese tasks have to be done daily. Which jobs shouldyou assign to your roommates to get the most free timeoverall? Assume you have the same number of hours todevote to cleaning. Now, since you are faster, you seemto get done quicker than your roommate. What sortsof problems may this create? Can you imagine a traderelated analogy to this problem?
Need Step by Step answer: How to draft on Excel. Because Income depends on work effort and work effort depends on nutrition, suppose the relationship between income (Y) and total food availability (F) in a poor household is given by: Y = 10F + 20F2 – 0.6F3 a) If food availability in a two-person household is 20, would it be “rational” to share the food? Explain. b) If food availability in a two-person household is 30, would it be “rational” to share the food? Explain.
EXERCISE 1Below is a production possibilities table for consumer goods (Food) and capital goods(Robots):A B C D EFood 0 1 2 3 4Robots 10 9 7 4 01. Show these data graphically. Upon what specific assumptions is this productionpossibilities curve based?2. If the economy is at point C, what is the cost of one more food? Of one morerobot? Explain how the production possibilities curve reflects the law ofincreasing opportunity costs.3. If the economy characterized by this production possibilities table and curvewere producing 3 food and 2 robots, what could you conclude about its use ofavailable resources?4. What would production at a point outside the production possibilities curveindicate? What must occur before the economy can attain such a level ofproduction?EXERCISE 2Explain how (if at all) each of the following affects the location of a country’s productionpossibilities curve:1. The quality of education increases.2. The number of unemployed workers increases.3. A new technique…
Consider a two-person exchange economy in which person 1 owns 200 units of x and 100 units of y while person 2 owns 100 units of x and 200 units y. Suppose their preferences over the two goods can be represented as: U1 (x, y) = y + 50Inx U2 (x, y) = y + 150lnx 1. How much of x do they trade among each other? 2. Does the First Welfare Theorem (FWT) hold in this economy?
Every year the residents of a historical town gatherto determine how much to spend on their park,10 percent or 15 percent of the budget. If everyonevotes for the same percentage, they will spend thatamount, unless the year before everyone voted forthe opposite percentage, in which case they spend theaverage of the two. What characteristic of the idealvoting system is violated in this example?