identify if one may be more appropriate for use with students to measure the same construct. A comparison of the assessments’ psychometric properties of reliability and validity are discussed, along with an analysis of theory and procedures to acquire reliability and validity. Next, an interpretation
the reverse. Why would this be so? The scores from any source can be reliable as the authority or sincerity towards responses is expected. Validity is of different type’s criterion, and the content validity. Face validity is often calculated and verified for instruments by teachers and it validates the nature of instruments but it doesn’t ensure the validity of all types. 2. What type of evidence—content-related, criterion-related, or construct-related—do you think is the easiest to obtain? The
judge/evaluate the quality of their measures? Tests for validity and reliability are the criteria mostly used by epidemiologists to judge the quality of measures used in research. Reliability of the measure shows that when different observers use the measure at different occasions, they will obtain similar test results (1). For example, a measure that determines weight gain among male adults in Saskatoon
Polit & Beck (2014) state “reliability is the consistency with which an instrument measures the attribute” (p.202). The less variation in repeated measurements, the more reliable the tool is (Polit & Beck, 2014, p.202). A reliable tool also measures accuracy in that it needs to capture true scores; an accurate tool maximizes the true score component and minimizes the error component (Polit & Beck, 2014). Reliable measures need to be stable, consistent, and equal. Stability refers “to the degree to
1. Define parallel forms reliability and split-half reliability. Explain how they are assessed. Parallel forms reliability is a type of measure of reliability that you can get by doing different types of assessment. They must both have same construct and knowledge system with the same group of people. You must make two parallel forms and create a questionnaire that will have the same system and by random divide the questionnaire into two different sets. Between the two parallel forms whatever correlation
• How do researchers determine reliability in a study? Describe the major types of each. According to our text Understanding Nursing Research: Building an Evidence-Based Practice “reliability testing is a measure of the amount of random error in the measurement technique. It takes into account such characteristics as dependability, precision, stability, consistency, and reproducibility (Grove, Gray, & Burns, 2015, p. 288). It then goes on to describe the different types that, “focuses on the following
Selection Interaction The last threat to internal validity is ‘selection interaction’. It is the interaction of the other threats with the selection threat. The most common of these threats is the interaction of selection threat with maturation. This combination of selection-maturation threat is concerned with different rates of growth between the two groups between the pre and post test (Slack and Draugalis, 2001). External Validity External validity can be defined as the ability of a research design
Business Research for Decision Making The work of decision making involves choosing between issues that require attention, setting goals, designing suitable courses of action and choosing among several alternatives through the evaluation of each one of the alternatives. Of great importance in decision making is the choosing between the several alternatives. The effectiveness of this work of decision making is of great importance for the well being of every business activity and determines the success
examine construct validity in regard to the MASC. Not only does the MTMM examine construct validity is can also assist with measuring divergent and convergent validity (Thaler et al., 2010). For example, divergent validity can be found through heterotrait-monomethod and heterotrait-heteromethod. Overall, the MASC displayed large to medium effect sizes for the overall total score in monotrait-heteromethod (Thaler et al., 2010). Their findings supported a high level of construct validity through higher
Reliability is most commonly used to refer to the degree of consistency with which measurement can be conducted, and it focuses primarily on the instruments used in research. In this most simple consideration of reliability, a researcher must demonstrate that an instrument yields consistent results. The attributes of instruments must not produce variability in research outcomes that could be misconstrued as changes to the variables being measured. Two common data collection methods are referred to