Should Student Athletes Be Paid? Essay

Should College Athletes Be Paid? Collegiate sports have turned into a billion dollar industry and are probably just as popular, if not more popular than professional sports. College athletes put their bodies on the line to play a sport they love, many with hopes and dreams to one day make it to the professional leagues. Athletic facilities are the major money makers for all universities. Colleges bring in billions of dollars in revenue annually, yet athletes do not get paid. Some fans believe

gymnastics, athletes devotion and sacrifice is innumerable. Athletes spend countless hours throughout the year training and performing in competition. According to the NCAA bylaw 17.1, athletes can only spend 20 hours a week with a maximum of 4 hours a day on athletically related activities. This rule excludes pre-season and post-season training which account for the other 50% of the year. Although most athletes get enjoyment out of simply playing, some athletes feel they should be paid for their

College Athletes should they Be paid or not. This has been a controversial issue since student athletes have been added to the universities. Today I am going to explain about what is considered a college athlete, the positives and negatives to athletes being paid, the positives and negatives to athletes not being paid, and my opinion on the current student athlete roles and positions. Now who exactly is considered a student athlete. Well a student athlete is someone who is competing in a sport

Paying college athletes is a hot topic between members of the NCAA. With all the money that college sports brings in, some people say that these athletes should get a portion of the money. I do not believe that college athletes should be paid. They already have scholarships that pay for their schooling, and giving these athletes money would only cause them to get into more problems away from their sport. This topic in particular sparks interest since I am interested in sports. When I first heard

student athletes, should be designed in a way that promotes academic progress as well as graduation. Whether you are on a college campus or listening to a sports talk radio show, the question of should college athletes be paid seems to have been discussed forever. One of the major arguments for paying student athletes is that the colleges use the athletes to generate revenue for the college. “There are also those that argue that athletes should be paid for the hours that they often put in their

many college athletes drop out of school because they do not have enough money to play for the team that recruited them? College athletes deserve to be paid because they attract a lot of revenue for the school, they sometimes do not receive adequate scholarship money, and they will be less likely to take illegal forms of payment from outside sources. College athletes deserve to be paid due to all the hard work they put in to school and their respective sport. To begin, college athletes bring in a

whether or not college athletes should be paid has a definitive answer. The case made by the NCAA is that they are not obliged to pay college athletes and the tuition covered is a reimbursement. Regardless, college athletes devote the majority of their time to the sport and must be paid as they help the NCAA make their annual revenue. The question is, should college athletes be paid? Yes, college athletes should be paid. The NCAA believes that college athletes do not have to be paid, as the organization

medias, million dollar coaches, and slave-working athletes. The NCAA became a bigger business in the last decades of the 20th century drawing broadcast networks, cable networks, commercial endorsement deals, and fans. However, the heart and soul of this business are the student-athletes. Players earn millions to billions of dollars for schools and private companies but must cheat their ways through academics because of demanding schedules. While athletes are contributing, the schools are making. The

people are paid for virtually anything nowadays; but for some reason we hold our superiorly achieving college athletes to a different moral standard where they showcase their highly profitable talents for free. College athletes such as Ben Simmons and Lonzo Ball, whose names alone bring in sell out crowds everywhere they go, are not paid, yet bring in insurmountable of profit to universities that not otherwise be possible. This begs the question: Do college athletes deserve to be paid for their time

programs. Division I college athletes, particularly football and basketball players, get many perks for contributing to the team’s season and devoting so much time to the sport. What is not often thought about is the money that football and basketball brings in and what the athletes get in return for bringing this money to the university. Many athletes are taken advantage of because the schools use the money for their own benefit, do not take into consideration the athletes busy schedule and not having