Case 4-1 KBC Solutions

.pdf

School

University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

6380

Subject

Accounting

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

1

Uploaded by lopezalejandra029

Report
Case 4-1 KBC Solutions Critically evaluate the judgments made by Grace as the senior by using the KPMG Professional Judgment Framework. KPMG’s Professional Judgement Framework include clarify issues and objectives, consider alternatives, gather and evaluate information, reach conclusion, and articulate and document rationale. Grace’s judgements were greatly affected by time constraints and pressure from her team. She should have approached the audit objectively and independently. She should have exhibited professional skepticism. Grace should have followed a system 2 approach which is slower, effortful, and more deliberate as compared to the system 1 approach she took which is fast, automatic, and effortless. Did Grace violate any rules of conduct in the AICPA Code? Explain. Grace violated section 0.300.060 Due Care and 0.300.050 Objectivity and Independence. Grace accepted KBC Solutions explanations and did not actively pursue the required backup to support the new acquisition of plant and equipment. She instead chose to approve the accounting for these items before receiving the invoices. She also failed to exhibit objectivity when she accepted KBC’s determinations of accrued expenses rather than display professional skepticism and review the appropriate backup herself. Does Rick have any ethical obligations in this matter? What should he do about signing off on the audit and why? As the review partner for this engagement, Rick does have an ethical obligation on the completion of the audit. He must ensure all appropriate audit procedures were followed by the audit team Grace led. He must ensure due care was taken and that professional skepticism was applied throughout the audit. An audit conducted by a CPA firm with proper audit procedures provides shareholders with a fair and accurate representation of company’s financial condition. As such, Rick must follow section 0.300.030 The Public Interest of the AICPA code. Before signing off on the audit, Rick must order the audit team to collect sufficient evidence to support the transactions he had issues with. This would increase the amount of time it takes to complete the audit, but it must be done in order to satisfy all audit requirements.
Discover more documents: Sign up today!
Unlock a world of knowledge! Explore tailored content for a richer learning experience. Here's what you'll get:
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help