IAF640 Midterm

.docx

School

Seneca College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

IAF640

Subject

Accounting

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

5

Uploaded by nevlau

Case Study J&C CO. J&C Co. (J&C) is a manufacturer of women’s outerwear. Most of J&C’s merchandise in manufactured in Canada. Although production costs are higher in Canada, the company finds that the high quality of the clothes allows it to remain profitable. J&C was founded in 2006 by John Hogan and Christine Murker. Each shareholder owns 50 percent of the shares of the company. In late 2019, John and Christine had a major disagreement on the direction of the company, and they have not spoken since. John is no longer involved in the day-to-day operations of the company and any input he provides is done through his lawyer. In April 2020, John and Christine agreed (through their lawyers) that Christine would buy John’s shares at fair market value, where fair market value would equal three times net income for the year ended December 31, 2020, with the financial statements prepared in accordance with Accounting Standards for Private Enterprises (ASPE) consistently applied. You are John’s long-time accountant and financial advisor. On February 15, 2021, John storms into your office in a rage. He has just received the 2020 financial statements from Christine, and they showed that net income was $142,000, well below the average reported in recent years. John blasts that this is “a complete and utter rip-off” because he’s not going to get nearly enough for his shares, and he isn’t going to stand for it. You tell John to calm down and he gives you the financial statements to examine. John points out a number of issues he is concerned about, and you tell him you will analyze them and prepare a report explaining any problems with the accounting treatments used and the impact on the agreement. The issues are described in Exhibit A, which follows. Required: Prepare the report for John Hogan. (100 marks) EXHIBIT A: Issues Identified on Your Review of J&C’s 2020 Financial Statements 1. In November 2020, J&C received an order from an outerwear distributor in Chile. The goods were produced and shipped on December 15. This is the first time J&C has shipped to this distributor and the first time it has shipped outside of North America. J&C’s credit department received a report from a credit rating agency in Chile that indicated the customer had a credit rating of “good.” The goods shipped are standard models that have been modified to meet the tastes of the Chilean market. These designs have always been popular in the North American market. The customer isn’t allowed to return any of the goods, but J&C has agreed to provide a rebate of 30 percent of the price the customer paid for any goods that it is unable to sell. J&C has not recognized the revenue as of December 31, 2020, because it’s waiting until the goods are sold by the Chilean distributor. 2. In 2016, J&C took advantage of an opportunity to buy large supply fasteners (buttons and zippers) from a supplier that was going out of business. At the time, John and Christine estimated that the supply of
fasteners purchased would last about four years. Since then, styles and technology have changed so that the items purchased in 2016 can only be used on lower-quality items and/or on the less-stylish garments J&C makes. Christine now thinks that this supply of fasteners can be used, but that it will take much longer than originally thought. Christine has been trying to sell the fasteners but has only managed to dispose of about 30 percent of the remaining amount. For accounting purposes, Christine has written off the remaining unsold inventory in the year ended December 31, 2020. 3. In late January 2021 one of the J&C Co’s customers filed for bankruptcy, which J&C had suspected might occur because the customer was already four months behind on payments. Christine thinks it’s very unlikely that it will collect any of the $55,000 owed by the customer. Christen has written off the amount. 4. J&C has provided a guarantee on $40,000 of debt for a related company, Thunder Bay Clothing (TBC) a couple of years ago. TBC has been experiencing financial difficulties, and there is a 10% chance that it may be insolvent within the next six months. TBC is currently working with its bank to refinance its debt and avoid bankruptcy. J&C accrued the entire amount in the financial statements of 2020. Your Answer Reporting To: John Hogan, Founder, J&C Co. From:, Accountant Reporting: Analyzing the identified issues from J&C's 2020 financial statement in accordance with ASPE GAAP constraint: This report will coincide with ASPE as the company is private and the financial statements are prepared in accordance with ASPE. Users Description John Hogan Co-Founder of J&C who is trying to withdraw from company by selling all shar Christine Murker Co-Founder of J&C who is trying to buy all shares of the company and may ha manipulated the Financial statements to reduce share price CRA For income tax purposes Introduction: John Hogan and Christine Murker opened a women's clothing company and everything was going well until they had a disagreement and John Hogan was excluded from all operations. John Hogan now wants to sell all his shares at fair market value to leave the company. To receive the shares at a better price, Christine Murker may have altered the treatment of the above transactions in favor of lowering Net Income which in turn would lower share prices. John Hogan has hired me to review these transactions and show the recommended treatment for them. Issues Issue 1: Revenue Recognition for sale to Chilean Distributor Measurable: Yes, Clothing was shipped off to the Chilean distributor at an agreed price
Collectable: Yes, the Chilean distributor has a good credit score according to a Chilean credit agency Performance Attained: Yes, J&C has shipped off the product, have been received by the distributor and there is no refund policy, only a rebate for unsold items of 30% Inference: Christine Murker did not recognize the revenue from the Chilean Distributor as she is waiting for the goods to be sold but within ASPE standards, the revenue should be recognized as all three criteria are met. Recommendations Alternative 1. Do not recognize the revenue This is the chosen method on the Financial statements As the Chilean Distributor has not yet paid, there is no revenue to be recognized Alternative 2. Recognize the full revenue As outlined in ASPE standards, for revenue to be recognized there are three conditions that need to be met. As shown above all three conditions have been met and therefore the revenue should be recognized There is a no return policy which means the Chilean distributor cannot back out of the deal and must pay It is shown they have a good credit score which represents their ability to pay Alternative 3. Recognize 70% of the revenue As stated, 30% of the price of merchandise unsold can be rebated. As there is no estimate on how much will be unsold, 70% of all revenue can be recognized first with the rest being recognized after the Chilean distributor has paid and shown the amount they could not sell It is recommended to go with alternative 3, as it is not too conservative nor aggressive in how it affects the net income of the year. Alternative 1 (currently elected) is too conservative and does not reflect the proper standings of the company. Alternative 2 is too aggressive and does not take into account the possible returns and therefore may overstate and inflate the net income of the year. Therefore alternative 3 is the best option and would increase net income Issue 2: Unsold fasteners write-off Inference: Christine has written off the fasteners from inventory as they are not selling as fast as projected. By doing so, net income is decreased while there may be better treatment for this transaction Recommendations Alternative 1: Write off the fasteners Chosen by the company Increases expenses which in turn reduces net income The fasteners are out dated and are no longer selling as fast as projected nor at the foreseen volume Write-off now to prevent changes to future years Alternative 2: Keep the fasteners Keep the fasteners in inventory There is no expiration date of the fasteners May come back into trend in the future Although the fasteners are not selling as foreseen, they are sitting in inventory and have no affect on the company Recommendation There is no need to write off the fasteners as they do not expire and may sold or used in the future. It is recommended to elect alternative 2. This would increase net income Issue 3: Customer Bankruptcy
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help