The Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment
docx
School
Ivy Tech Community College, Indianapolis *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
104
Subject
Accounting
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
1
Uploaded by BaronOxidePorcupine34
The Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment (MDVE) stands as a significant study
that examined how domestic violence offenders respond to different police interventions. Through random assignment, three responses were tested: arrest, mediation, and separation. The findings demonstrated that arrest proved to be the most effective deterrent against future violence. As a result, many states and police departments have adopted pro-arrest or mandatory arrest policies for domestic violence cases.
Despite its initial success, the effectiveness of the MDVE has been called into question by subsequent research, which has yielded mixed or even contradictory findings. Some scholars contend that contextual factors, such as the high conviction
rate and low unemployment rate in Minneapolis at the time, may have influenced the program's outcomes. Others have suggested that the impact of arrest may differ depending on the offender's employment status, marital status, and criminal history. Consequently, police should adopt a customized and adaptable approach to domestic violence calls that takes into account the unique circumstances and requirements of each situation, rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all strategy.
Enhancing their response to domestic violence calls is crucial for police to prevent future incidents. Here are three measures they can take:
Risk Assessment: Using standardized tools such as the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA) to evaluate the level of danger and risk faced by victims. This helps police make informed decisions about bail, supervision, and treatment.
Victim Support: Prioritizing emotional support, information, and resources for victims. For example, the Domestic Violence Emergency Response System (DVERS) connects victims with a 24-hour hotline and a wireless device that can alert police in emergencies.
Offender Accountability: Holding offenders accountable for their actions and monitoring their compliance with court orders and treatment programs. The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) helps police evaluate the risk of reoffending and the need for supervision and intervention. By ensuring offender accountability, police can reduce the likelihood of future domestic violence incidents.
Hilton NZ, Harris GT, Rice ME, Lang C, Cormier CA, Lines KJ. A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: the Ontario domestic assault risk assessment. Psychol Assess. 2004 Sep;16(3):267-75. doi: 10.1037/1040-
3590.16.3.267. Erratum in: Psychol Assess. 2005 Jun;17(2):131. PMID: 15456382. A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: the Ontario domestic assault risk assessment - PubMed (nih.gov)
Neil Websdale & Byron Johnson (1997) The policing of domestic violence in rural and
urban areas: The voices of battered women in Kentucky, Policing and Society, 6:4, 297-317, DOI: 10.1080/10439463.1997.9964759 Citation Manager | Taylor & Francis
Online (tandfonline.com)
Discover more documents: Sign up today!
Unlock a world of knowledge! Explore tailored content for a richer learning experience. Here's what you'll get:
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Documents
Related Questions
Which of the following is an example of a questionable research practice?
a) Suzie was part-way through data collection and wanted to see how participants were performing so looked at group means
b) Kit had to end data collection early because of the pandemic, but luckily, they still had enough power to detect the effects of interest
c) Larry ran a post-hoc power analysis and found that he had insufficient power to find the effect he was interested in so collected more participants
d)Erik planned to examine how birth month is related to neuroticism, but after data collection decided birth season would be more theoretically meaningful
arrow_forward
All of the following are possible responses to a pervasive weakness in internal control except:
Multiple Choice
Assign more experienced personnel to the engagement.
Increasing the level of supervision on the engagement.
Increase the size of a sample for certain tests in the engagement.
Adding an element of unpredictability to the procedures performed.
arrow_forward
Able, a Certified Fraud Examiner, interviewed a suspect involved in an environmental crime. The suspect, Blake, admitted to purposely polluting the environment. Blake’s action eventually caused almost thirty people to develop serious environmentally related illness. Upon hearing this fact from Blake, Able should: A. Scold Blake for his conduct. B. Make no comment whatever. C. Treat Blake with decency and respect. D. Ask Blake to apologize to the victims.
arrow_forward
Research fraud cases that involved agency conflicts. Provide the following:
Overview of the organization
Who was involved?
How was the fraud committed?
What was the outcome?
What recommendations do you have to stop such a fraud relating to this conflict of interest?
arrow_forward
After the Madoff case, the SEC instituted a number of reforms to its operations. Please visit the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov) and search for Post-Madoff reforms. Next, please identify the two reforms that you believe will have the best chance of catching a criminal like Madoff. Make sure to provide justification for your choices.
arrow_forward
When the risk of material misstatement due to fraud is considered high in a particular area, which of the following is a likely response? Perform tests on an interim basis throughout the period. Obtain more reliable evidence by expanding tests to include all transactions. a. b. C. d. Obtain additional corroborative information. Design tests of controls to substantiate weaknesses.
arrow_forward
Please describe a time when you were faced with a personal dilemma regarding whether to blow the whistle on a wrongdoing. Some examples of a wrongdoing are witnessing cheating on an exam, witnessing someone trying to steal, noticing someone trying to take advantage of another, and completing a project at work without recording time spent in order to meet time constraints. Who were the stakeholders in the situation and how were they impacted by the wrongdoing? How did rationalization encourage the wrongdoer to follow through with their wrongdoing? What did you do and why?
Case scenario: for someone working but not clocking in
How would this fit under this dilemma? Please explain:
arrow_forward
Please describe a time when you were faced with a personal dilemma regarding whether to blow the whistle on a wrongdoing. Some examples of a wrongdoing are witnessing cheating on an exam, witnessing someone trying to steal, noticing someone trying to take advantage of another, and completing a project at work without recording time spent in order to meet time constraints. Who were the stakeholders in the situation and how were they impacted by the wrongdoing? How did rationalization encourage the wrongdoer to follow through with their wrongdoing? What did you do and why?
arrow_forward
For this assignment, you are to construct a diagram of the Fraud Triangle and clearly label each component of the Fraud Triangle. For each of these three components, provide the following:
An explanation (two to three paragraphs) of each of the three components, specifically addressing how it could contribute to fraud.
For each component of the Fraud Triangle, provide the following:
List and briefly discuss internal controls for each of the three components that could help to reduce the impact of potential frauds related to that component of the Fraud Triangle.
Note: This means that you will have a total of 24 internal controls documented. A few of the internal controls might be common to each component but please tailor them to the component you are referring to and do not copy and paste the same eight internal controls for each component.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be…
arrow_forward
Is the following a potential control weakness?
In employing new staff, while Marco checks references for any prospective employee, they do not check criminal records or perform other forms of background checks.
Briefly explain the potential mistatement and recommended correction.
arrow_forward
A procurement agent for a large metropolitan building authority threatens to blacklist a building contractor if he does not make a financial payment to the agent. If the contractor does not cooperate, the contractor will be denied future work. Faced with a threat of economic loss, the contractor makes the payment.Required;Explain what type of fraud is this and what controls can be implemented to prevent or detect the fraud?
arrow_forward
Understanding what constitutes fraud and understanding the framework are a part of developing an internal control program. The fraud triangle is a framework that is used to understand and explain what the motivation could be when a person decides to commit fraud.
Thinking about the fraud cases that you are aware of, how would the fraud triangle explain fraudulent behavior?
arrow_forward
Explain the differences between Criminal Fraud versus Civil Fraud and provide an example of each type. Provide rationales and support for the examples in your response.
arrow_forward
Match the following terms and descriptions.
1.
Audit planning
2.
Preventive Controls
3.
System Evaluation and
Selection
4.
Recovery Operations Centre
(ROC)
5.
The Sarbanes/Oxley Act
Section 404
Identify optimal solution from alternatives.
Involves feasibility study and cost-benefit
analysis steps.
In the event of a major disaster, a
subscriber can occupy the premises and,
within a few hours, resume processing critical
applications.
The auditor's objective is to obtain sufficient
information about the firm to plan the other
phases of the audit.
Requires the management of public
companies to assess the effectiveness of
their organization's internal controls
Passive techniques designed to reduce the
frequency of occurrence of undesirable
events.
arrow_forward
What is a good response to?
1. Identify the differences between paper-based and digital evidence. Paper evidence and electronic evidence are so different that if investigators are mainly familiar with the use of paper evidence in crime investigations, they are likely to have difficulty incorporating electronic evidence into their crime analysis or brainstorming activities (Crumbley & Fenton, 2021). For example, handwritten signatures using an ink pen are only going to be found on paper documents. Paper evidence only displays the dates printed on the document. Finding dates on electronic documents differs significantly, as there are many dates; there are the dates on the document itself as well as the date when the document was created, accessed, or last modified (Crumbley & Fenton, 2021).
2. Do you believe that digital evidence can be destroyed? Yes, I believe digital evidence can be destroy Attempts to destroy digital evidence are very common (Gubanov, 2012). Such attempts…
arrow_forward
2
arrow_forward
The Australian Institute of Criminology (AIC) asserts that three factors can explain fraud. Which of the following is not considered as one of the factors asserted by the AIC?
Pressure, opportunity, and rationalization
Absence of effective and efficient internal controls
Availability of suitable targets
Supply of motivated and willing offenders
All the above
None of the above
West Coast Baseball Association, Inc.’s, (WCBA) baseball stadium was destroyed by a tornado. WCBA and its insurance company disagreed on the amount to recover for the damages. As a result, you have been engaged as a forensic accountant to compute the amount recoverable for the damages after trial as an Exhibit to be presented in a court of law.
However, based on negotiations, the litigants (WCBA and the insurance company) have agreed on the following cost elements:
Projected earnings after trial, had the harmful event not occurred was $4,300,500 million
Project earnings after the trial were $500,000…
arrow_forward
A council health inspector threatens to close down a restaurant by issuing a fake health violation notice if the owner does not make a financial payment to him. If the restaurant owner does not cooperate, the restaurant cannot be opened for business and the negative publicity will drive customers away. Faced with the potential economic loss, the owner makes the payment.
which fraud is it and controls can be implemented to prevent or detect the fraud
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you

Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course ...
Statistics
ISBN:9781305627734
Author:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. Anderson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Related Questions
- Which of the following is an example of a questionable research practice? a) Suzie was part-way through data collection and wanted to see how participants were performing so looked at group means b) Kit had to end data collection early because of the pandemic, but luckily, they still had enough power to detect the effects of interest c) Larry ran a post-hoc power analysis and found that he had insufficient power to find the effect he was interested in so collected more participants d)Erik planned to examine how birth month is related to neuroticism, but after data collection decided birth season would be more theoretically meaningfularrow_forwardAll of the following are possible responses to a pervasive weakness in internal control except: Multiple Choice Assign more experienced personnel to the engagement. Increasing the level of supervision on the engagement. Increase the size of a sample for certain tests in the engagement. Adding an element of unpredictability to the procedures performed.arrow_forwardAble, a Certified Fraud Examiner, interviewed a suspect involved in an environmental crime. The suspect, Blake, admitted to purposely polluting the environment. Blake’s action eventually caused almost thirty people to develop serious environmentally related illness. Upon hearing this fact from Blake, Able should: A. Scold Blake for his conduct. B. Make no comment whatever. C. Treat Blake with decency and respect. D. Ask Blake to apologize to the victims.arrow_forward
- Research fraud cases that involved agency conflicts. Provide the following: Overview of the organization Who was involved? How was the fraud committed? What was the outcome? What recommendations do you have to stop such a fraud relating to this conflict of interest?arrow_forwardAfter the Madoff case, the SEC instituted a number of reforms to its operations. Please visit the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov) and search for Post-Madoff reforms. Next, please identify the two reforms that you believe will have the best chance of catching a criminal like Madoff. Make sure to provide justification for your choices.arrow_forwardWhen the risk of material misstatement due to fraud is considered high in a particular area, which of the following is a likely response? Perform tests on an interim basis throughout the period. Obtain more reliable evidence by expanding tests to include all transactions. a. b. C. d. Obtain additional corroborative information. Design tests of controls to substantiate weaknesses.arrow_forward
- Please describe a time when you were faced with a personal dilemma regarding whether to blow the whistle on a wrongdoing. Some examples of a wrongdoing are witnessing cheating on an exam, witnessing someone trying to steal, noticing someone trying to take advantage of another, and completing a project at work without recording time spent in order to meet time constraints. Who were the stakeholders in the situation and how were they impacted by the wrongdoing? How did rationalization encourage the wrongdoer to follow through with their wrongdoing? What did you do and why? Case scenario: for someone working but not clocking in How would this fit under this dilemma? Please explain:arrow_forwardPlease describe a time when you were faced with a personal dilemma regarding whether to blow the whistle on a wrongdoing. Some examples of a wrongdoing are witnessing cheating on an exam, witnessing someone trying to steal, noticing someone trying to take advantage of another, and completing a project at work without recording time spent in order to meet time constraints. Who were the stakeholders in the situation and how were they impacted by the wrongdoing? How did rationalization encourage the wrongdoer to follow through with their wrongdoing? What did you do and why?arrow_forwardFor this assignment, you are to construct a diagram of the Fraud Triangle and clearly label each component of the Fraud Triangle. For each of these three components, provide the following: An explanation (two to three paragraphs) of each of the three components, specifically addressing how it could contribute to fraud. For each component of the Fraud Triangle, provide the following: List and briefly discuss internal controls for each of the three components that could help to reduce the impact of potential frauds related to that component of the Fraud Triangle. Note: This means that you will have a total of 24 internal controls documented. A few of the internal controls might be common to each component but please tailor them to the component you are referring to and do not copy and paste the same eight internal controls for each component. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be…arrow_forward
- Is the following a potential control weakness? In employing new staff, while Marco checks references for any prospective employee, they do not check criminal records or perform other forms of background checks. Briefly explain the potential mistatement and recommended correction.arrow_forwardA procurement agent for a large metropolitan building authority threatens to blacklist a building contractor if he does not make a financial payment to the agent. If the contractor does not cooperate, the contractor will be denied future work. Faced with a threat of economic loss, the contractor makes the payment.Required;Explain what type of fraud is this and what controls can be implemented to prevent or detect the fraud?arrow_forwardUnderstanding what constitutes fraud and understanding the framework are a part of developing an internal control program. The fraud triangle is a framework that is used to understand and explain what the motivation could be when a person decides to commit fraud. Thinking about the fraud cases that you are aware of, how would the fraud triangle explain fraudulent behavior?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course ...StatisticsISBN:9781305627734Author:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. AndersonPublisher:Cengage Learning

Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course ...
Statistics
ISBN:9781305627734
Author:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. Anderson
Publisher:Cengage Learning