PA 504 Assignment 6

.docx

School

Northern Illinois University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

504

Subject

Accounting

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

6

Uploaded by BailiffGalaxy12177

Chapter 11: Questions 1, 3, 5 and 6 1) The Illinois Department of Revenue does not administer property tax. It is managed by the local governments including cities, counties, and taxing districts. The final tax rate is the result of budgets established to provide services, an assessor’s assessment, a county auditor’s calculations, and laws administered by the Illinois Department of Revenue. Due to the length of time needed to determine or answer all questions, the basic principles and events involved in calculating the property tax rate, assessor's assessment, a county auditor’s calculations, and laws administered by the Illinois Department of Revenue. All property is discovered, listed, and appraised so that values for property tax purposes can be determined. Local assessing officials determine most property values; the local county board of review and the Illinois Department of Revenue also for the elders a Senior Citizens Real Estate Tax Deferral Program was formed which allows people 65 years of age and older, who have a total household income for the year of no greater than $65,000 and meet certain other qualifications, to defer all or part (up to a maximum of $7,500) of the real estate taxes and special assessments on their principal residences. The deferral is like a loan against the property’s market value. Residential real estate includes all lands and buildings which are primarily used or intended for human habitation, including those buildings located on agricultural land, dwelling as well as structures and improvements, garages, whether attached or detached, tennis courts, swimming pools, guest cottages, and storage sheds for household goods, buildings for human habitation that are used as commercial ventures, including but not limited to hotels, motels, rest homes, and structures containing three or more separate living quarters are not considered residential real estate. The effective date of the assessment is January 1st of the current year. "Expanded" circuit-breakers also are restricted to elderly citizens. Every family that meets the state income criteria may qualify for property tax relief under the general circuit breakers. 3) A) The issue is trying to understand the property's assessed value by which property tax is to be charged and using the property tax rate correctly, which varies according to local tax laws for city or township. Knowing each of the five township governments applies property tax to fund their operations, which are determined by: Property Tax= tax rate * assessed value= tax rate * 0.5 * fair cash value (as per definition of assessed value) Continuously, the amount that each township has planned to spend next year. So, we understand the amount budgeted to spend next year must entirely come from property tax levied in the five townships. However, in the case of Booneville (city) the amount to be spent next year will partly come from property tax and partly come from local earned income tax of $7,50,000. From the data of planned expenditure given in the question, fair cash value of units located in each township and the methodology as explained in the paragraph above, we can infer the property tax for each of the five townships and the Booneville (city) as per the table below: Region Fair Cash Value Assessed value= 0.5 * Fair cash value Planned expenditure Local earned income tax Balance amount to be raised through property tax= planned expenditure- Property Tax Rate=amount to be raised through property tax/assessed Tax rate per $100 of assessed value=tax rate * 100
local earned income tax value Nixon 69535000 34767500 99000 0 99000 0.002847 0.284749 Reagan 35000000 17500000 150000 0 150000 0.008571 0.857143 Davis 23720000 11860000 250000 0 250000 0.021079 2.107926 Greasy Creek 15922000 7961000 175000 0 175000 0.21982 2.198216 Navaho 27291000 13645500 83000 0 83000 0.006083 0.608259 Booneville (Davis Township) 88450000 44225000 4539000 0 3789000 0.046252 4.625188 Booneville (Greasy Creek Township) 75392000 37696000 4539000 750000 3789000 0.046252 4.625188 I added the total planned expenditure of Booneville city from Booneville (Davis Township) and Booneville (Greasy Creek Township), because the township value data for 5 townships are for the area outside city and the same. There are other planned expenditures which is not added in the calculation like Central County expenses of $3,428,000 and independent school district expenses of $6,350,000 and $3,800,000. In case, we want to include these taxes, we can distribute cental county expense equally amongst 5 townships and 1 city and independent school district expenses equally amongst the townships to which they cater to and then calculate the property tax, however, since the question is unreliable or the same, we won't add these expenses. B) Knight family owns property= $1,20,000 (fair cash value) = $ 60,000 (assessed value), now we see from the table above that in Davis portion of Booneville, tax rate comes out to be ~4.63 per 100 dollars, therefore for $60000 property tax would come out to be 2,778 C) The current market value of Knight property is 2,25,000 then its assessed value= 0.5*225000=112,500 its actual tax assessment comes out to be 1125*4.63 (per 100-dollar tax rate) = 5,208.75, however, since it is paying only 2,778 as calculated in the previous question, therefore its effective tax rate comes out to be 2.47 per 100 dollar D) Seagram united school district= 1,800 students, Clinton consolidated schools= 600 students. So, tax rate = $1 of $100 assessed value. Now, tax to be collected or planned expenditure, Seagram = $6,350,000 and Clinton= $3,800,00. So, the assessed value will be Seagram = $6,350,00 x 100 = $635,000,000. Also, Clinton = $3,800,00 x 100 =$380,000,00; And the dollars per pupil yield will be Seagram = $635,000,000/1800= $352,778. Furthermore, the dollars per pupil yield will be Clinton= $380,000,000/600= $633,334. Finally, the dollars per pupil yield will be Clinton= $633,334.
E) Central County 3428/ (335310/2) 2.045 Booneville City (4539-750)/ (88450+75392)/2 4.625 Nixon Township 99/ (69535/2) 0.285 Reagan Township 150/ (35000/2) 0.857 Davis Township 250/ (23720/2) 2.108 Greasy Creek Township 175/ (15922/2) 2.198 Navaho Township 83/ (27291/2) 0.608 Seagram United Schools 6350/ (23720+15922+163842)/2 6.241 Yeltsin Consolidated Schools 3800/ (69535+35000+27291)/2 5.765 New base (Denominator) Rate Navaho Township (27291+15000)/2 0.393 Yeltsin Consolidated Schools (69535+35000+27291+15000 )/2 5.176 Central county (335310+15000)/2 1.957 7.526 Bill= $15,000,000/2 * 7.526%= $564,437.79 F) Nixon Reagan Davis Greasy Creek Navaho Seagram United x x Yeltsin Consolidated Schools x x x Fair Cash Values $69,535,000 $35,000,000 $23,720,000 $15,922,000 $27,291,000 Booneville (Davis Township) $88,450,000 Booneville (Greasy Creek township) $75,392,000 Total Fair Cash Values $69,535,000 $35,000,000 $112,170,000 $91,314,000 $27,291,000 Access Value (50% fair cash value) $34,767,500 $17,500,000 $56,085,000 $46,657,000 $13,645,500 Access Value- Assumed to $69,535,000 $35,000,000 $112,170,000 $91,314,000 $27,291,000
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help