Anthro1022- Lab 4

.docx

School

Western University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1022

Subject

Anthropology

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by SuperSardineMaster534

Report
ANTH 1022, Fall 2021 Lab 4 – Typology – Response Template Your group has been asked to analyze a collection of objects from a hypothetical archaeological site in southwestern Ontario. All are real artifacts for which no contextual information is available. Working as a group, examine the artifacts and use the handout as a guide to help you create a typology for these artifacts. Record your typology in a tree diagram like the one on the handout, so you can refer back to it as you record your answers in the template below . Be careful – some of the stone objects have sharp edges. Don’t cut yourself ! Write over the yellow highlighted text to input your answers to the questions below . Grading Q1 and Q2: There are may ways to answer these questions. As long as you follow the directions and there is an inherent logic to your categories, you will receive full marks . Q3 to Q5: The point value for each question is indicated. You will receive one mark for each correct and well explained/supported point you make . Question 1 Score : a) How many Classes do you have (Level 1)? (0.25 marks ( b) What are they? (0.75 marks ( Question 2 Score : · Which of your Classes (Level 1) has the most types and subtypes? Describe the characteristics of all subdivisions of that class below. (2 marks) 3 Describe them briefly ( 1-3 words each; Add/delete classes as needed ( Class 1: Shards Class 2: Pottery Class 3: Tools Tools (Class 3 (
ANTH 1022, Fall 2021 Types (Level 2 :( Subtypes (Level 3 ( Sub-subtypes (Level 4 ( Question 3 · What could account for differences you observe between the different types and subtypes within this Class? In other words, what might these differences say about the people who made and used these objects and/or about the objects themselves? ) 3 marks; max 90 words ( My word count is: Score : Add descriptions; max 1 line each; Add/delete types as needed 1 Complex tools that require more effort and resources 2 : Simple tools that can be made quickly with limited resources Add descriptions; max 1 line each; Add/delete types as needed 1A: Metal materials that have been manufactured for a specific purpose 2A: Mostly intact stones such as core stones, not necessarily a specific purpose 2B: Sharp stones that have been manufactured for a specific purpose Add descriptions; max 1 line each; Add/delete sub-subtypes & Levels as needed 1A-1: Metal Nails (likely architectural use, requires forging of metal ( 1A-2: Metal Keys (likely architectural use as well, requires forging of metal ( 2A-1: Hammer stones (large, mostly intact stones likely used to knock shards off of other stones ( 2A-2: Core stones (the leftover of the stone that tools have been made from ( 89 Possible reasons for the differences could be time period and method of subsistence. Stone tools made from flintknapping could be older, before the technological development of metal tools such as nails or keys. Stone tools also may be more likely to appear in communities of foragers or pastoralists, whereas metal materials could be found in agricultural communities, because agriculturalists are typically sedentary and would have more resources and time to forge metal items as opposed to nomadic foragers. Agricultural communities are known to be more technologically advanced as well .
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help