Research Paper- annotated bibliography

.docx

School

Liberty University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

290

Subject

Arts Humanities

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by CoachFire442

Report
Sources C. John Collins, Genesis 1-4: A Linguistic, Literary, and Theological Commentary (Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing Company, 2006). This book specifically digs deep into the Analogical Days theory by C. John Collins. Collins uses this book to discuss Genesis 1-4 which includes the creation week, the garden of Eden, the fall, and what takes place after Eden. Collins discusses uses Biblical text to explain his theory that God’s work days as seen in Genesis 1 are to be analogous to our work days now. Averbeck, Richard. Reading Genesis 1-2 : An Evangelical Conversation . Edited by J. Daryl Charles. Peabody, Massachusetts: Hendrickson Publishers, 2013. This book brings multiple Old Testament scholars together to break down, explain, and compare different views on the book of Genesis. This book breaks down theories of Genesis and allows for one to take note of how their views align with the views explained. Specifically in Chapter 3: Analogical Days, of this book, the Sabbath is explained and explains how “the work, rest and day in the fourth commandment are analogous to God’s.” Young-Earth Creation Journals DeRemer, Frank. “Good approach misapplied to get ‘analogical days.’” Review of Genesis 1–4: A Linguistic, Literary, and Theological Commentary, by C. John Collins. Journal of Creation 21, no. 2 (2007): 35-39. https://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j21_2/j21_2_35- 39.pdf This journal article breaks about four critical inferences that, according to the author DeRemer, seem to put Collins’ interpretation off track for what he was saying. DeRemer says that “All four of these imply that the days are not ordinary bot ‘analogical’ days. I will use this journal review to compare what Collins says in Genesis 1-4 compared to DeRemer’s judgement on the book and he believes what Collins states is a misapplication of what the Bible says. Wang, Ting. “Adam’s Day.” Review of Reading Genesis 1–2: An Evangelical Conversation, Edited by J. Daryl Charles. Journal of Creation 29, no. 2 (2015): 62-68. https://dl0.creation.com/articles/p102/c10259/j29_2_62-68.pdf
This journal review is reviewing the book Reading Genesis 1-2. This review breaks down the different sections of the book and explains some recurring topics, as well as the author’s reflections. This journal review explains how Genesis harmonizes with modern scientific perspectives on origins. (Traditional 24-hour day, young-Earth view) Kulikovsky, Andrew. “Sizing the Day.” A Review of The Genesis Debate: Three Views on the Days of Creation, Edited by David G. Hagopian, Crux Press, (2001 ). Journal of Creation 16, no. 1 (April 2002): 41-44. https://answersingenesis.org/days-of-creation/sizing-the- day/ This Journal Review presents 3 views: the 24-hour literal day view, the day-age view, and the literary framework view. For my paper, I will use this journal review to get more information on the Sabbath. The journal review says that “the 24-hour day view is the ‘external’ Sabbath which is supposed to imply an eternal seventh day.” Using this journal review I will be able to compare what C. John Collins says about the Sabbath and what a traditional 24-hour day, young-Earth creationist believes about the Sabbath
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help