CP2

.pdf

School

East Carolina University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

7165

Subject

Business

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

1

Uploaded by CountWaterOtter177

Report
Farah Zeidan February 18, 2024 DS 251 Computer Project 2 1. Null hypothesis: H0 : μ 1 = μ 2 Alternative hypothesis: H1 : μ 1 ≠ μ 2 2. Test statistic: 1.33 P - Value: 0.1879 Not rejected What is your recommendation for Par, Inc. management? The statistical analysis conducted indicates that there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the performance of the New golf ball differs significantly from the current one. The obtained p-value (0.1879) exceeds the commonly used significance level of 0.05. Meaning that we cannot confidently conclude a difference in performance between the two types of golf balls. Given the outcome, I suggest that Par, Inc. management delay the introduction of the New golf ball for now. Instead, it would be wise to gather additional information or conduct further testing before making any decisions. 3. The null hypothesis is not rejected, indicating no difference between the population means of driving distances for the Current and New golf balls. Therefore, there appears to be no necessity for Par Inc. to introduce a cut-resistant, longer-lasting golf ball.
Discover more documents: Sign up today!
Unlock a world of knowledge! Explore tailored content for a richer learning experience. Here's what you'll get:
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help