Project 1 essay outline 2 (1)

.doc

School

Seneca College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

116

Subject

Communications

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

doc

Pages

Uploaded by DeaconAardvarkPerson1043

Critique Essay Outline Template (10%) Part 1 Using the source, you picked in Unit 2, identify the rhetorical context in point form: Author: Mohammad Keyhani, Hadi Hemmati, Leslie Salgado Purpose: collective learning about Generative AI Genre: Opinion piece in a news paper Language: Academic Timeliness: Published November 21, 2023 Part 2: What types of persuasive techniques has the writer used? Find an example to support your response. Your author may have used one or all three. Ethos (appealing to authority): The authors establish credibility by referencing Carnegie Mellon University professor Elizabeth A. Holm and Google DeepMind researchers. Pathos (appealing to the audience’s emotions): The article concern over the black box nature of AI and highlights instances of AI failures. Logos (using facts, evidence, and logic): The authors present research findings and examples to support their argument for collective learning and understanding of Generative AI. Part 3: Fill out the t-chart and evaluate the effectiveness of the article using the CRAAP TEST. Circle yes or no and then explain and find an example from the text. Some instructors will do this with you in class if you are part of a DLO or in-person session.

Currency Is it current? Yes or No Relevance Is it relevant: Yes or No Authority Does the author have experience discussing the topic? Are there authority figures used in the supports? Yes or No Accuracy Is the article accurate? You may need to do a little bit of fact checking. Yes or No Purpose Does the author achieve their purpose? Yes or No The article was published in 2023, addressing current discussions on AI and education. The content is relevant to the growing field of Generative AI. Such as, society's understanding of AI's implications. The authors cite experts and research findings to support claims. For example, the authors use Carnegie Mellon University professor Holm’s opinion The article presents research findings and information. The authors achieve their purpose of advocating for collective learning about GenAI. Discussion on the role of post- secondary institutions.

Part 4: Outline Write in complete sentences or point form. Make sure that your ideas are clear if you are using point form. Use ONE framework for each response section: Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, Purpose, Appeal to emotion, Bias, Hasty generalizations, etc. 1. Evaluation of Currency 2. Evaluation of Purpose Summary and Introduction Summarize the main idea of the source in 4-5 sentences. The article 'Why student experiments with Generative AI matter for our collective learning,' (2023), written by Mohammad Keyhani, Hadi Hemmati, Leslie Salgado. The authors discuss the transformative impact of Generative AI, exemplified by tools like ChatGPT, on thinking, learning, and work. The author identifies the black box nature of these AI systems as a challenge to trust and reliability. Despite such challenges, the author argues for collective learning and understanding, particularly in post-secondary institutions. The author also discusses ongoing research on learning techniques and highlights the role of user communities in collective discovery and AI failures and research findings to support its argument. The authors conclude by advocating for an educational approach in universities, fostering critical thinking and ethical prompt engineering. Overall, it positions GenAI as an augmenting force, urging a collective effort for broader participation in understanding and utilizing this transformative technology. Thesis: Create a thesis statement that indicates your evaluation of the source. In other words, do you think the article is effective or flawed? The article effectively advocates for collective learning about Generative AI, providing insights and research to support its claims. Response Segment 1 Write a topic sentence choosing a framework that evaluates the article. In other words, is the article written well, or are there gaps and flaws? The article effectively maintains currency by addressing contemporary issues in Generative AI and referencing recent research findings and expert opinions, ensuring its relevance and credibility in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help