Assignment: From Issue to Persuasion
As a supply chain subcontract specialist at Northrop Grumman, the future of AI in my career presents two arguable sides. On one hand, the ongoing development of AI in supply chain management offers potential benefits such as improved efficiency, cost reduction, and enhanced decision-making through predictive analytics. AI algorithms can analyze vast amounts of data to optimize inventory levels, streamline logistics, and identify potential risks. I see this side of the argument emphasizing the positive impact AI can have on the effectiveness of my role, leading to better strategic decision-making and overall supply chain performance.
On the other hand, I recognize concerns related to the ethical implications of AI, especially in the context of supply chain management. The use of AI algorithms in decision-
making processes may introduce biases or unintended consequences. For example, if historical data used to train AI models contains biases, it could lead to unfair practices in areas like vendor selection or employee evaluation. Additionally, there may be resistance from stakeholders who fear job displacement due to automation. I understand this argument focusing on the need for responsible AI implementation, ethical considerations, and addressing the potential socio-
economic impacts on the workforce.
The question of military readiness holds significant relevance to my career as well. The issue has two debatable sides that directly impact my work in managing the supply chain. On one
side, concerns are raised about the Pentagon's preparedness for future threats, evident in recent Navy and Air Force accidents and growing challenges from global adversaries like China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran. These incidents highlight potential gaps in training, maintenance, and overall readiness.
