ENGG404 Rubric3 Final Report 2023F v20231121

ENGG404 Final Report Marking Rubric: 3 of 8 2023F  Your team works for ABC Conglomerate. (1 mark)  Senior management has learned / heard of a loss incident at a competitor, has realized that ABC has operations almost identical to the loss incident under study, and wants to learn from this loss incident. (2 marks):  Senior management has asked your team to conduct an investigation and root cause analysis into the loss incident under study, make recommendations to senior management to address and correct the latent causes as determined from the root cause analysis. (2 marks): 2.3 Scope and Boundaries (score of 5 * 2/5 = 2 marks total):  A bullet list for the three areas of investigation as to what is specifically inside scope i.e. what was investigated, and what is specifically outside the scope i.e. what was not investigated.  Award 5 marks for a bullet list that looks like this example: The scope and boundaries of the investigation into the Sunrise Propane Loss Incident are:  The Incident Model:  Inside: The energy source and the loss of control.  Outside: Who or what is in the line-of-fire.  Risk Management System Elements:  Inside: #2 RAMR, #5 IRIAA, #6 PECI, #7 DCSU, #8 O&MJ, and #9 ECT  Outside: #3 CAER, #4 MOC, #10 CCI, and #11 OFID are outside the scope.  Technical / Engineering Causes:  Inside: Source of Fuel, Ignition Sources  Outside: Oxygen Deduct 2 marks for each area (Incident Model RME’s, Other Technical / Engineering Cause) that is missing; deduct 1 mark for each incomplete area i.e. “Outside” is missing for RME’s. Then multiply the score by 5/15 = score out of 5: Chapter 3: Hazards Related to the Loss Incident and Prevention Through Design (20 marks): This chapter consists of 2 sections: 3.1 Hazards Related to the Loss Incident (10 marks) The intent is to analyse four (4) hazards that were identified in the investigation. Award 10 marks as follows: each row in the table will consist of:  Activity (2 marks – subject and activity descriptor)  Hazard - Full Description (3 marks):  Nature of Hazard (1 mark)  Explanation of Components: an explanation for any 2 of the 3 incident model components: energy source, loss of control, line-of-fire; (2 marks for each component, 4 marks total) If content is NOT in a table, deduct 5 marks. # Activity Hazard - Full Description Nature of Hazard Explanation of Components 1 #1: 2 marks – subject and activity descriptor 3 marks 1 mark An explanation for any 2 of these 3 components: energy source, loss of control, line-of-fire); 2 marks for each component, 4 marks total 2 2 marks 3 marks 1 mark 4 marks 3 2 marks 3 marks 1 mark 4 marks 4 2 marks 3 marks 1 mark 4 marks Ten (10) marks for each hazard analysed times four (4) hazards = 40 marks / 4 = 10 marks total Then multiply the score by 10/40 = score out of 10: 3.2 Application of Prevention Through Design (10 marks) For each hazard, list two (2) design improvements that would help lower the risk of the design. (Hint – Apply Haddon’s model) ; 2 marks for the table, plus 1 mark for each design improvements x 2 x 4 = 8 marks # Hazard - Brief Description Design Improvement #1 Design Improvement #2 1 No mark design improvement (1 mark) design improvement (1 mark) 2 No mark design improvement (1 mark) design improvement (1 mark) 3 No mark design improvement (1 mark) design improvement (1 mark) 4 No mark design improvement (1 mark) design improvement (1 mark) 20 Chapter 4: Key Recommendations and Leading Indicators (47 marks total) The set of Key Recommendations must look like the layout per the report template. The following are based on the template: Assess 2 marks:  Look for a numbered list of 4 prioritized Key Recommendations) (2 marks, no part marks): > numbered from 1 to the highest e.g. from 1 to 4, and > check that the “total score” is aligned with the prioritized list e.g. #1 Key Recommendation has the highest “total score”, #2 has the 47