Week 6 Discussions and posts

.doc

School

Grand Canyon University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

ELM560

Subject

English

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

doc

Pages

3

Uploaded by ProfessorCrowMaster1016

Week 6, Discussion 1: Expectations in Context The article "Young Writer With a Following Admits Fabricating Dylan Quotes in Book" describes the situation of Jonah Lehrer, a writer who violated expectations regarding the integrity of his work. Expectations for writers can vary from one context to another. In WRTG 112, we have been studying how to use sources in a research paper. In this discussion, we will explore how the expectations for college research writing are similar and/or different from expectations in other writing contexts. Initial post (by 11:59 p.m. on Friday): Respond to the following in 1-2 paragraphs. Summarize the expectations for the use of sources in a college research paper, as you understand them. In what ways are these expectations similar to or different from expectations you have observed in other contexts, such as workplace, personal, or journalistic writing? You might use observations from your reading about Jonah Lehrer in addition to personal experience in your response. In a college research paper, expectations for the use of sources are typically high, emphasizing the need for thorough research and proper citation. Academic integrity is paramount, and students are expected to draw from reputable sources, critically evaluate information, and integrate it seamlessly into their own arguments. Proper citation formats, such as APA, MLA, or Chicago style, must be followed to give credit to the original authors and avoid plagiarism (University of Pittsburgh, 2023). Professors often emphasize the importance of primary sources, peer-reviewed articles, and scholarly publications to ensure the reliability and credibility of the information presented. Additionally, the synthesis of various sources is encouraged to demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the topic and contribute to the academic discourse. Comparatively, expectations for source usage in college research papers differ from other writing contexts, such as workplace, personal, or journalistic writing. While the workplace may prioritize brevity and practicality, academic papers demand a deeper engagement with the subject matter and a meticulous acknowledgment of sources. Personal writing often allows for a more subjective and creative approach, whereas journalistic writing requires a balance between objectivity and compelling storytelling. Drawing parallels, however, one can observe that ethical considerations, such as proper attribution and avoiding misinformation, are common expectations across these contexts. The case of Jonah Lehrer, a journalist who faced scrutiny for fabricating quotes and sources, serves as a cautionary tale applicable to various writing domains, emphasizing the universal importance of integrity and accuracy in the use of sources (Gitlin, 20212). Reference
Gitlin, J. (2012). The ethics of recycling content: Jonah Lehrer accused of self-plagiarism. https://arstechnica.com/science/2012/06/the-ethics-of-recycling-content-jonah-lehrer- accused-of-self-plagiarism/ University of Pittsburgh. (2023). Citation Styles: APA, MLA, Chicago, Turabian, IEEE. https://pitt.libguides.com/citationhelp Peer Response (first peer response due by 11:59 p.m. on Sunday; second peer response due by 11:59 p.m. on Tuesday) For maximum points, respond to at least two of your classmates. Are there areas in which your understanding differs from theirs? What can you add to their observations? Week 6, Discussion 2: Direct Quotes Initial post (by 11:59 p.m. on Friday): Post one body paragraph from your research paper draft that uses at least one direct quote. Use a different color font, bolding, or underlining for the sentence with the quote. Then respond to the following: Collaboration, another essential skill, is inherently promoted through gamified educational platforms. Multiplayer elements, team challenges, and cooperative missions create a social dynamic that encourages students to work together toward a common goal. Zainuddin et al., (2020) stated, “Incorporating game-based elements into learning is an alternative means to enrich student collaborative interaction, by applying to Wiki-based learning or within MOOCs, to utilize diverse game elements such as reputation points, peer tutoring, competition, altruism, group identification, and peer appraisal” (p.11). This collaborative experience mirrors the teamwork required in students working together, fostering interpersonal skills and an understanding of how collective efforts can lead to shared success. Communication skills are honed as students engage with gamified platforms. Whether through in-game communication, collaboration on group projects, or presenting findings, students learn to articulate ideas effectively. The interactive nature of gamification necessitates clear communication, bridging the gap between individual understanding and shared knowledge—a skill essential for academic presentations and professional interactions (Zainuddin et al., 2020) Is the direct quote incorporated correctly? Explain. Yes, the direct quote is incorporated correctly. It is introduced with an appropriate lead-in, and the citation (Zainuddin et al., 2020) follows the quote, providing the necessary information for referencing. Does the direct quote work grammatically in the larger sentence it's a part of? Explain.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help