From Issue to Persuasion
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Southern New Hampshire University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
ENG123
Subject
English
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by BarristerThunder11980
From Issue to Persuasion
Alana Aldridge
ENG-123-H7969
Part 1
Issue 1:
Standardization of Depot level maintenance practices in military aviation.
There is a lack of standardization for Depot-level maintenance practices in military aviation.
There are two sides to this statement. The first is that there are people who have no experience in
how to properly maintain these aircraft and the types of missions that they are used for. The
second is that the standard that is in place is not specific and leaves too much to interpretation on
the maintainer’s behalf. I believe that both are arguable by themselves, however, I also believe
that they go hand in hand with one another. If you fixed the standardization and elevated the
quality of work necessary to achieve a better product, then the individuals that have no
knowledge of military aviation can do maintenance regardless of the mission that the aircraft is
used for.
Issue 2:
Hiring criteria for the civilian sector of military aviation.
There is a lack of experience necessary to hire civilians to do work in military aviation. This lack
of knowledge puts a strain on individuals with actual experience in this field and slows down
production. This also causes a shortage of jobs for those who do have the necessary knowledge
to work in this field but are forced to find other employment while their skills and talents go to
waste. The proper hiring criteria would help with production and with the job shortage for
military veterans. This is not to say that civilians with proper training would be a hindrance or
take away a job from a qualified veteran, but that there should be an education requirement for
those who do not have a background with experience in this field.
Part 2
I am choosing the first issue in the standardization of maintenance practices in military
aviation and more specifically that the standard that is in place is not specific and leaves too
much to interpretation on the maintainer’s behalf. I believe that this could possibly address all
my issues at the source, and it would be a better solution to many other problems encountered in
military aviation such as production costs, hiring/ turnover costs, material costs, knowledge gaps,
military readiness, production timelines, and reduction in outsourcing. These are all real
problems and can begin to lessen if the maintenance performed on military aircraft is made into
more standard and specific practices. Standardization should reflect a type/ model/ series
approach instead of a “ that’s the way we’ve always done it” mentality.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help