Lecture 3 Ethics in Finance Example QS

.pdf

School

University of Technology Sydney *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

25602

Subject

Finance

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

4

Uploaded by jessnvogue

A few prep questions for the Trio Capital Case (one of several cases we discussed): Did the regulators do a good job? 1. No, APRA and ASIC were both investigating the source but didn’t collaborate or communicate with each other to solve the issue and therefore the efforts went longer than it should have How did other parties do, including auditors? 2. 6000 Australians - SMSF Tax payers Regulators - ASIC and APRA Auditors Custodian - had minimal partaking Investors Financial advisors - flourished on referrals/ recommendations (commissions) Employees in the company Who got hurt and why? 3. Total damages to fund = $180M Over 6000 Australians, 5000 APRA related funds got up to $55M in funds returned Direct investors and SMSF - not able to gain compensation (who paid for compensation? APRA from tax payer money, govt, tax payers) Did some investors lose more than others? Yes - What was the key issue? 4. Trio Capital largest fraud in Aus - super funds lost and missing from this scheme Jack Flader - the mastermind behind the scheme Trio acquired Tolhurst - 2 schemes Direct investors and SMSF investors were not able to gain any compensation compared to APRA related investors Scheme funds were moved overseas - harder to recover them Lack of communication between APRA and ASIC could've made the scandal end earlier - both had different investigations going on Investment fund and super fund fraud Who lost money? Why? Which group did lose money? All investors? 5. Over 6000 Australians, 5000 APRA related funds got up to $55M in funds returned Direct investors and SMSF - not able to gain compensation Additional questions to guide your study: What is the EMH, what does it express? 1. EMH = efficient market hypothesis: hypothesis in finance that states asset prices reflect all available information Semi strong - will readjust itself on an event Market cannot be strong form - unless everyone ignores the laws Does insider trading happen in stock markets? 2. Yes. Topic 3 Example questions Tuesday, 7 March 2023 9:39 PM Ethics in Finance Page 1
Yes. Loose lips - insider info, earnings and M&A - Using EFTs to conceal insider trading Found significant levels of shadow trading Insider trading more invasive - What bias drove Curtis to act on inside information? 3. How did those accused rationalise their wrong doing? Didn't think they would get caught Within ethical/ reasonable limits - Decision making biases that played a role? (Wrongdoers/ whistleblower) Self interest, overconfidence, incentive gaming - What rationalisation made Madoff pull of his fraud? 4. How did those accused rationalise their wrong doing? Company best interest - Decision making biases that played a role? (Wrongdoers/ whistleblower) People working with Madoff Ethical fading Self interest bias Obedience to authority Moral myopia People who were smaller investors: Overconfidence Cognitive dissonance Hindsight - What is a Ponzi scheme? 5. Ponzi scheme: form of fraud in which belief in the success of a non-existent enterprise is fostered by the payment of quick returns to the first investors from money invested by recent investors Was Markopoulos a whistleblower according to the textbook? 6. No. Markopoulos not involved in Ponzi scheme (was not with the company in any way) How big is the Aussie Super industry? 7. Size of super = $3.32T in Australia Size of SMSF = $865B (funds less than 7 members) - 26% of supers What is an SMSF? 8. SMSF: private super fund that you manage yourself. Different to industry and retail super funds When you manage your own super, you put money you would normally put in retail or - Ethics in Finance Page 2
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help