Assignment 1 ENST 3022 Emma Keary
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Carleton University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
3022
Subject
Geography
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
8
Uploaded by ElderFangGiraffe20
GEOG/ENST 3022. Integrated Resource and Environmental Management
[Evaluation of the GRAND diversion Water Export]
Submitted by
[Emma Keary, 101147039]
Section 1. Introduction
1.0 Purpose of the Project
Purpose of the Project Assessment
The purpose of the GRAND diversion assessment is to create a “continental
water management complex” that will divert more than 60% of Hudson’s Bay
freshwater annually to comply with the rights and obligations set under the UN 2010
Resolution to address the ongoing global issue on water scarcity and security.
Context of the Project
Projects that focus on water security on dominantly along a widespread
global platform, however, the Grand diversion project is localized with strong
social constructs in North America. Since the post-WWII era, there has been a
larger focus on sustainability, where governmental officials regulated massive
water diversion projects for hydroelectric purposes. Society has continued to
move forward on this path of sustainability when drought-ridden regions were
in sudden declining water security. Extending the water diversion project not
only secures everyone has adequate access to water but complies with the UN
2010 resolution that details the right to potable water and security.
The demand for further development on this current project is often
distinguished because of the effect of water scarcity on other regions. Society
works on water diversion methods to accommodate for the most drought-
ridden areas in North America, while also building relations with each country
through cooperation.
Potential Influencing Factors to be Considered in the Proposed Assessment
Category/Facto
r
Possible Factors/Issues
Political
The Political factors of the project assessment are defined
through the natural principles, however dominantly by Canada,
with assistance from the United States in relation to Canada’s
interpretation of the status of available water and current policies
and guidelines.
One of the natural principles of water currently, is the
repeatedly increasing global issue of water scarcity and
security.
The process of water exportation has set authorizes, which
apply to the Canadian federal government, that dictate the
ability to export to other provinces and countries.
The United States political matter becomes a necessity for
water import more than ever because drought levels
severity has affected more than 60% of the total country.
Economic
Economic factors that are considered in the proposed
1
assessment of the Grand diversion project as positive and both
negative attributes.
It is estimated that this project in revenue from the process
of exportation can bring in anywhere from $8 -$16 billion
dollars.
Not only would the revenues from water export be
significant and sustainable it also works in the relationship
that Canada, the United States, and Mexico continuously
develop.
this project sees an initial cost of implementation spanning
the course of the next 30 years that could cost anywhere
from $100-$200 billion dollars.
Social
The social implications involved in this current assessment
apply to the everchanging nature, and unrelated political and
environmental issues.
One Influencing social factor in the assessment is the
change in social situations in the region. As this project is
focusing on the environmental implications, unlike previous
projects that focus on similar implications aimed to support
the indigenous. As a result, we could see some unfortunate
circumstances revolving around social and cultural ties.
Some also believe that they could be confronted by several
people who clearly disagree with the addition of
hydroelectricity and damming.
Environmental
As environmental factors are often emphasized in the current
assessment, we acknowledge the impacts made on the
ecosystems.
There is a profound impact on the watershed ecosystems.
Table 1.0.1.
Potential influencing factors to be considered in the Assessment.
Factors/Issues to be excluded from the Proposed Assessment
Category/Facto
r
Possible Factors/Issues + Explanation why
Political
Political factors that are often excluded in the scope of the
assessment show different relations.
The Sovereignty limits apply because there is a connection
between three countries and the assurance that there is no
assessment outside of their own region, as well as the
indigenous as closer to the north we go, the larger
community of indigenous we get.
Economic
Economic factors that are excluded from the current
assessment of the GRAND diversion project often relate to the
implementation of the status of the project.
We learn the overall cost of the project in the upcoming
years, but what is not disclosed is the method of whether
we will see a rise in taxes, or if the government had room in
the budget to accommodate.
Social
Social factors and issues excluded relate to the impact of the
surrounding communities, and specifically the indigenous within.
2
The assessment addresses concerns from these
communities, however, it’s all theoretical, and they
excluded the information directly from the source.
Environmental
The Grand diversion project excludes practical applications on
the home front of environmental factors.
We continue to see a theoretical approach on whether we
will see an improvement in water scarcity and security.
Table 1.0.2.
Limitations of the proposed Assessment.
1.1Describing the Project
Description of the Proposed Project
The proposed GRAND diversion project will seek to divert freshwater to Western
Canada, Southern United States, and Northern Mexico where currently droughts most
emanate. To do so, the Canadian government
will aim to cut off James Bay from Hudson’s
Bay, by converting James Bay into a
freshwater reservoir fed by surrounding rivers
and streams. The conversion of a reservoir
with the feedings from additional bodies of
water will allow the production of a major dike,
that will further be developed to produce
hydroelectric power with the development of
hydro powerplants, but dominantly the
benefits that subside with the diversion of
water are the sense of security in a time of
water scarcity. In correlation to basic human
rights and set out in the UN 2010 resolution,
this project secures that everyone in North
America will have equal access to freshwater
as well as the security of water. Figure 1 shows
the route of the diversion project which
correlates to the regions of high-water scarcity,
so with the conclusion of this project all regions
will be complying with methods set out by the
United Nations.
Project Physical Components to be included in the Assessment
Component
Explanation
Formation
of
Major dike
The formation of a major dike overall will help to control the water
flow levels during high and low tides. They will utilize this and build
outflow gates and hydroelectric equipment; this would generate
electricity during the pumping/transferring of water
Build multiple
powerplants
Utilizing the dikes for powerplants does not just occur naturally,
there is the infrastructure that needs to be considered for safety,
ethics, and practical uses. As well as the cost of the initial project,
Figure 1. Path of route for
diversion project, with emphasis
on regions with water scarcity.
3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help