AA Peer_Review_Feedback_Worksheet

.docx

School

Chamberlain University College of Nursing *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

Subject

Health Science

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by AmbassadorStraw13374

i-Human Patients ® Assignment Peer Review Feedback Worksheet ©2023 Chamberlain University LLC. All rights reserved. Chamberlain University | National Management Offices | 500 W. Monroe St., Suite 1300 | Chicago, IL 60661 Peer Review Feedback Rubric Students are expected to utilize the Peer Review Rubric when evaluating the CJMM worksheet of another peer. Assignment Section and Required Criteria (Points possible/% of total points available) High Level Of Performance Satisfactory Level of Performance Unsatisfactory Level of Performance Section not present in paper For each of the 6 sections of the CJMM worksheet, evaluate your peer’s responses by providing 2-3 sentences of relevant feedback on strengths and weaknesses. Meets All 3 Criteria Meets 2 Criteria Meets 1 Criteria Did Not Complete Recognize Cues  Is the information in this section accurate and relevant to the patient?  Is there any missing information?  How could your peer have improved their responses? Provides focused, accurate, thorough, and relevant responses. Provides accurate and relevant responses. Some information may be missing. Provides unclear, inaccurate, and/or irrelevant responses. Significant information missing. Section not completed. Insert your feedback here: There is accurate and relevant information recognized and listed. This information is necessary for a proper assessment and plan of care for this patient. Peer was able to recognize significant cues for this patient based on the patients history and subjective/objective data. Analyze Cues  Is the information in this section accurate and relevant to the patient?  Is there any missing information?  How could your peer have improved their responses? Provides focused, accurate, thorough, and relevant responses. Provides accurate and relevant responses. Some information may be missing. Provides unclear, inaccurate, and/or irrelevant responses. Significant information missing. Section not completed. Insert your feedback here: Potential problems are concise and relevant to the patient. All potential problems listed are potential complications with schizophrenia and more specifically this patient. The peer could maybe provide additional data to the 1 st potential problem or reword it as it is a bit confusing on what they are trying to say. Prioritize Hypothesis  Is the information in this section accurate and relevant to the patient?  Is there any missing information?  How could your peer have improved their responses? Provides focused, accurate, thorough, and relevant responses. Provides accurate and relevant responses. Some information may be missing. Provides unclear, inaccurate, and/or irrelevant responses. Significant information missing. Section not completed. Insert your feedback here: Reasoning behind the prioritization is of high quality and standard. Responses are detailed and well wrtittten while alsp mentioning how these are current issues yet understanding which ones are urgent and at more risk for self-harm/harm of others. Generate Solutions  Is the information in this section accurate and relevant to the patient?  Is there any missing information?  How could your peer have improved their responses? Provides focused, accurate, thorough, and relevant responses. Provides accurate and relevant responses. Some information may be missing. Provides unclear, inaccurate, and/or irrelevant responses. Significant information missing. Section not completed.

i-Human Patients ® Assignment Peer Review Feedback Worksheet ©2023 Chamberlain University LLC. All rights reserved. Chamberlain University | National Management Offices | 500 W. Monroe St., Suite 1300 | Chicago, IL 60661 Insert your feedback here: While these solutions were different than mine, they were still accurate actions. They focused a lot on the prevention of harm such as removing harmful objects, having a sitter, and proper use of medication which is important. Priority actins match expected outcomes. Take Action  Is the information in this section accurate and relevant to the patient?  Is there any missing information?  How could your peer have improved their responses? Provides focused, accurate, thorough, and relevant responses. Provides accurate and relevant responses. Some information may be missing. Provides unclear, inaccurate, and/or irrelevant responses. Significant information missing. Section not completed. Insert your feedback here: Wonderful environmental actions for the patient and necessary to notice in order to give the patient the best care possible. Performing actions and teaching the patient about medication importance is crucial. Evaluate Outcomes  Is the information in this section accurate and relevant to the patient?  Is there any missing information?  How could your peer have improved their responses? Provides focused, accurate, thorough, and relevant responses. Provides accurate and relevant responses. Some information may be missing. Provides unclear, inaccurate, and/or irrelevant responses. Significant information missing. Section not completed. Insert your feedback here: Peer was prominent at being aware of environmental and individual factors that are important to recognize. Evaluated outcomes should be expected if interventions were properly done.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help