[Assignment 3] Chapter 4(1)

.pdf

School

University of Mississippi *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

363

Subject

Health Science

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

5

Uploaded by CountPencilWasp34

Report
NHM 363 Chapter 4 Lily Runnels In this chapter, we are looking at the various “forces” that impact the world of purchasing including the distribution channels we covered in chapter 3. You will need to read the sections in chapter 4 pertaining to the following forces: 1. Economic 2. Political and Ethical 3. Legal 4. Technological Force Written Assignment: In a Word document, please complete the following assignments and place it in the dropbox by the end of the week. 1. “Economic Force”: Read the supplemental story “Economic Force – Global Food Supply and Prices.” (pages 55 to 57 in your textbook) Briefly summarize the recent concerns of: beef, limes, and shrimp. Why are they of concern? What do you think will be a future concern in the industry based on week 2’s lessons (i.e. COVID-19)? Recent concerns in the food industry have been centered around beef, limes, and shrimp due to various factors impacting their supply and prices. Drought conditions in the United States have led to reduced cattle herds, causing beef prices to surge. Lime prices have also skyrocketed due to diseases affecting crops in Mexico, leading to severe shortages and significant price increases. Additionally, the shrimp supply has been affected by a bacterial infection, resulting in a sharp decline in supply and subsequent price hikes. These issues have raised alarms among restaurant owners and companies, prompting them to consider adjustments to cope with higher costs. Looking ahead, future concerns may include supply chain disruptions and shifts in consumer preferences, especially in light of lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Adaptation and resilience will be crucial for businesses to navigate these challenges and maintain stability in the food supply chain. 2. After reading the “Political Force”, I want you to go to the following webpage: https://www.fda.gov/media/116000/download
After reading through the site on Menu Labeling, answer these questions: What impact does the menu labeling regulation have on restaurants? What type of restaurants will be affected? Do you agree or disagree with this law? Why do you feel the way you do? The menu labeling regulation, enforced by the FDA, necessitates that certain establishments, particularly those within chains with 20 or more fixed locations, disclose calorie and nutritional information for standard menu items. This mandate extends to a wide range of food service businesses, including quick-service and sit-down restaurants, grocery stores, entertainment venues, and cafeterias. By requiring transparency in nutrition information, the regulation aims to empower consumers to make informed dietary choices when dining out, contributing to public health efforts against obesity and chronic diseases. However, the regulation imposes significant operational and financial burdens on affected establishments, including costs associated with data collection, analysis, menu redesign, and staff training. Compliance may be particularly challenging for smaller businesses with limited resources, necessitating support mechanisms to facilitate adherence to the regulation without undue hardship. While I support the overarching goal of providing consumers with transparent nutrition information, I also recognize the challenges that the menu labeling regulation poses for restaurants, especially smaller establishments. The regulation's focus on standardized disclosure may inadvertently place a heavier burden on businesses with fewer resources to dedicate to compliance efforts. As such, there is a need for flexibility and support from regulatory agencies to assist businesses in meeting the requirements without compromising their viability. Overall, while menu labeling regulations represent a step forward in promoting healthier dietary choices, policymakers must strike a balance between consumer empowerment and the practical realities faced by food service establishments, particularly smaller businesses. 2b. After reading the “Ethical Force”: Answer this scenario: A supplier sends a free case of your favorite wine to your house and thanks you for doing business with them for the past year. What would you do with the wine? 1. Accept it 2. Return it 3. Accept it but offer to pay “cost” for it 4. Accept it but put it into your company inventory
What would you do? Why? In this scenario, the most ethically responsible course of action would be to return the free case of wine to the supplier. Accepting the gift, even with the intention of paying for it or incorporating it into company inventory, risks compromising the integrity of the business relationship and raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest. By declining the gift and returning it to the supplier, ethical standards of transparency, fairness, and impartiality are upheld, ensuring that business decisions are made based solely on merit and without the influence of external favors or inducements. This approach preserves the credibility of the business relationship and maintains trust and integrity in professional dealings. Now what about in this situation? Assume that you are a dietician at a medium size regional hospital. A pharmaceutical sales representative has contacted you to discuss a new enteral nutrition supplement. He sets up a lunch meeting with you. He comes by your office with a catering platter from Newk’s. As you sit and meet with him, he offers you a weekend hotel/spa package to the Peabody, Memphis if you agree to start “lobbying” for this new product for use in the hospital and to persuade the hospital purchasing manager to buy it. However you feel this is unethical to do and decline. The sales representative thanks you for your time and leaves. A week later, you receive a $100 Newk’s gift card from the sales rep with a follow up thank you card. Is it ethical to accept it? Why? Why not? What are your options? It is not ethical to accept the $100 Newk’s gift card from the pharmaceutical sales representative in this situation. The offer of a weekend hotel/spa package and the subsequent gift card can be seen as attempts to influence the dietician's professional judgment and decision-making process, creating a conflict of interest. Accepting such gifts could compromise the integrity of the dietician's role and potentially undermine patient care by prioritizing the interests of the pharmaceutical company over the best interests of the hospital's patients. Therefore, the dietician should decline the gift card and any other offers from the sales representative. Instead, the dietician should report the incident to hospital administration or the appropriate regulatory body to ensure transparency and uphold ethical standards. Additionally, the dietician can explore alternative channels for obtaining unbiased information about the new enteral nutrition supplement and engage in evidence-based decision-making regarding its use in the hospital. 3. “Legal Force”:
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help