Unit 2 discussion 2 treating Hypertensive Urgencies

.docx

School

Herzing University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

636

Subject

Health Science

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

7

Uploaded by UltraScorpionPerson224

Report
Unit 2 Discussion 2: Treating Hypertensive Urgencies Albert JP Nayve Herzing University NU636 Advanced Pharmacology Dr. Tiffany Glass January 18, 2024
Discussion Scenario You have a 57-year-old mixed-race male (black and Asian) who comes into your office for a screening to participate in a study to evaluate the effectiveness of a home cervical traction device on neck pain and intervertebral disc space.  He has a history of neck pain and was diagnosed six years ago with spinal stenosis at the C5-C6 level. During the screening, the gentleman is found to have a BP of 217/109.  When you question him about this BP measurement he reports to you that he knows that his blood pressure has been in that range for about the last decade.  He reports he has not seen a health care professional about his elevated blood pressure and does not have a health care professional that he sees on a routine basis.  He is a healthcare professional at the provider level. Based on the blood pressure measurement he does not meet the inclusion criterion for the cervical traction device research study. Please develop a discussion that responds to each of the following prompts.  Where appropriate your discussion needs to be supported by scholarly resources.  Be sure to include in-text citations in the context of the discussion and provide a full reference citation at the end of the discussion. Discussion Prompt Utilize the information provided in the scenario to create your discussion post.  Construct your response as an abbreviated SOAP note (Subjective Objective Assessment Plan). Structure your ‘P’ in the following format:  [NOTE:  if any of the 3 categories is not applicable to your plan please use the ‘heading’ and after the ‘:’ input N/A]
Therapeutics: pharmacologic interventions, if any – new or revisions to existing; include considerations for OTC agents (pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic/alternative); [optional - any other therapies in lieu of pharmacologic intervention] Educational: health information clients need in order to address their presenting problem(s); health information in support of any of the ‘therapeutics’ identified above; information about follow-up care where appropriate; provision of anticipatory guidance and counseling during the context of the office visit Consultation/Collaboration: if appropriate - collaborative ‘Advanced Care Planning’ with the patient/patient’s care giver; if appropriate -placing the patient in a Transitional Care Model for appropriate pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic care; if appropriate – consult with or referral to another provider while the patient is still in the office; Identification of any future referral you would consider making Support the interventions outlined in your ‘P’ with scholarly resources. RESPONSE The following case study features a 57-year-old mixed-race male with a history of persistent neck discomfort and spinal stenosis who is interested in participating in a cervical traction device
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help