“Accounts of the Boston Massacre”
.pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Oakland Community College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1110
Subject
History
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
Pages
2
Uploaded by DoctorEchidna948
“Accounts of the Boston Massacre”
Directions:
Read the accounts of the Boston Massacre and answer the following questions as thoroughly as
possible. Answer in complete sentences. Your responses will be handed in and graded. The worksheet is worth 15
points.
Who wrote these accounts? What do we know about the author?
●
The account is anonymous, so the specific author is not identified. However, it
provides a detailed narrative of the events surrounding the Boston Massacre and
reflects the sentiments and perspectives of some of the inhabitants of Boston at
the time.
When and where were the letters written? To whom were they writing? Who was the
intended audience?
●
The letter was written shortly after the Boston Massacre, which occurred on
March 5, 1770. It was likely written to inform others, possibly authorities or the
public, about the events as perceived by the writer. The intended audience would
have been those seeking information about the incident.
What were the authors’ intended purposes in writing the letters?
●
The intended purpose of the letter appears to be to provide an account of the
events leading up to and during the Boston Massacre, as well as to present a
perspective on the causes and consequences of the incident. It aims to convey
the grievances of the inhabitants of Boston and perhaps garner support for their
cause.
On what do the authors agree? In other words, where do the accounts of the Boston
Massacre have the same information? Be as thorough as possible.
●
Both accounts agree on the basic facts surrounding the Boston Massacre: that it
occurred on March 5, 1770, involving a confrontation between British soldiers
and civilians in Boston. They agree on the number of casualties and provide
details about the sequence of events leading up to the violence.
On what do the authors disagree? Answer as completely as possible.
●
While both accounts agree on the occurrence of the Boston Massacre, they may
differ in their interpretation of events and the assignment of blame. For example,
the anonymous account places significant blame on the actions of the British
soldiers and the presence of troops in Boston, while other accounts may provide
a different perspective, perhaps emphasizing different factors leading to the
violence.
Are there reasons to believe one of the authors over the other? Give specific reasons to
support your answer.
●
Without additional context or corroborating evidence, it is challenging to
determine the veracity of one account over the other. Each account likely reflects
the biases and perspectives of the author, and it would be essential to consider
multiple sources and perspectives to form a comprehensive understanding of the
events.
What can we learn about the Boston Massacre from these documents?
●
From these documents, we can learn about the tensions between the inhabitants
of Boston and British soldiers stationed in the city, as well as the events leading
up to the Boston Massacre itself. The accounts provide insight into the political
and social climate of the time, highlighting grievances and conflicts that ultimately
erupted into violence.
What can we learn about the period leading into the American Revolution from these
documents?
●
These documents offer insights into the period leading into the American
Revolution by illustrating the growing discontent and resistance among the
American colonists toward British rule. They demonstrate the escalation of
tensions and conflicts between the colonists and British authorities, which would
ultimately culminate in the American Revolutionary War.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help