Suzlon v Microsoft

.docx

School

Pennsylvania State University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

785

Subject

History

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by ChancellorGalaxyGerbil49

Report
Shabeer Bokhari Case Brief #5 12/1/2023 Ist 432 SUZLON ENERGY v. MICROSOFT Title/Citation/Procedural History: Title: Suzlon Energy Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation Citation: No. 10-35793 Procedural History: The case is an appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Suzlon Energy Ltd. is the petitioner-appellant, Microsoft Corporation is the respondent-appellee, and Rajagopalan Sridhar is the intervenor-defendant-appellee. Facts/Synopsis: Suzlon Energy Ltd. sought emails from Microsoft's Hotmail email account of Rajagopalan Sridhar to use in a civil fraud proceeding pending against Sridhar and others in the Federal Court of Australia. The relevant emails are stored on a domestic server by a domestic corporation, Microsoft. The district court initially granted Suzlon's petition for production of documents, but Microsoft filed objections and the district court deemed it as a motion to quash. Microsoft and Sridhar raised several arguments to support the motion to quash including the requirement of discoverability in the foreign proceeding, compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. The district court agreed with the third argument, held that the plain terms of the statute applied the ECPA to all persons, and granted the motion to quash.
Legal Question/Issue: Does the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) apply to foreign citizens such as Sridhar? Legal Answer/Decision: Yes, the ECPA applies to foreign citizens such as Sridhar. The district court found that the plain terms of the statute applied to the ECPA to all persons. Discussion/Rationale: The district court found that the ECPA applied to all persons based on the plain language of the statute. The district court rejected Microsoft's and Sridhar's argument that production of the emails would violate the ECPA and held that the ECPA applied to all persons. Suzlon appealed the district court's finding, focusing on the third argument, but the appeal was affirmed. Analysis (as appropriate): The case highlights the importance of privacy laws and the application of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act to protect personal information. The case also shows the power of the district court in interpreting and applying the laws in the jurisdiction.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help