Makilah Epps
Dr. Mark Bernhardt
History of Civilization II
February 21, 2024
1.
Considering Universal Rights
In what ways do these sources criticize the idea of
universal human rights as the basis for government? Do they reject the concept of
human rights altogether?
The authors argue against the idea of using universal human rights as a basis for authority
due to the potential for change and following conflict. Many would no longer know where
they stood, and new rules would need to be established. Human rights are not completely
denied, but there is a great deal of skepticism about the idea.
2.
Making Comparisons
In what different ways do opponents argue against the
Atlantic revolutions and their echoes? Consider issues of rights, social stability, race,
and gender.
It is a common argument made by opponents of the Atlantic Revolutions that the aftermath
of government overthrow often results in violence and chaos. This can lead to a significant
disruption of the existing social structure, a rejection of long-established customs and
institutions, and the emergence of new ideas surrounding liberty, equality, and religious
freedom. Some revolutionary leaders have been known to deny universal rights to minority
groups once they come into power, which further worsens these issues.
3.
Identifying Opponents of the Revolutions
Based on these sources and the text
narrative, which groups of people opposed the Atlantic revolutions? Why?
The text discusses the critics and opponents of the Atlantic Revolutions. Critics of universal
human rights argue it can lead to conflict. Opponents argue that revolution can lead to violence,
disrupt social structures, and deny rights to minority groups. Those unaffected by the current
regime opposed the revolution due to uncertainty about maintaining their privileges under a new
government.
