IE 1072 HW 2
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Pittsburgh *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1072
Subject
Industrial Engineering
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by CorporalOkapi1224
1.
Detail the three plans and explain the steps taken to formulate each one: You are a member of
the Quality Assurance team at a leading American automobile manufacturing company. Your
responsibilities include creating sampling strategies for key features that might result in major
malfunctions in a new engine model. The engine components will be sourced from suppliers in
lots of 10,000 parts.
a.
The first team member proposes a single sampling plan as follows: The batch's quality
level deemed acceptable is 1% with a 90% probability of acceptance. The batch quality
level that is almost certain to be rejected if presented is 8% with a 10% probability of
acceptance.
The plan-Ensure quality levels for consumer/producer:
1.
Draw a line connecting α on the right with the corresponding AQL on the left on a binomial
nomograph
a.
AQL = 0.01, α = 0.1
2.
Draw a similar line connecting β on the right with the corresponding LTPD on the left on the
binomial nomograph
a.
LTPD = 0.08, β
= 0.1
3.
At the intersection between the two lines, the required sample size (n) and the maximum
number of defectives permitted (c) can be found within the sample for acceptance.
a.
The second team member recommends a different single plan: To achieve an Average
Outgoing Quality Limit (AOQL) of 3%, given that the supplier's process average is 0.5%.
The plan-Ensure average outgoing quality level:
1.
Use the Dodge-Romig inspection table for single sampling plans for AOQL = 3%
2.
Look at the row for a lot size between 7,001 and 10,000
3.
Look at the column for a process average between 0.07% and 0.6% because the supplier’s
process average is 0.5%
4.
n = 46, c = 2, LTPD = 11.6%
a.
The third team member offers a single plan: To guarantee that the quality is no worse
than a Rejectable Quality Level (RQL) of 1%, considering the supplier's process average is
0.5%.
The plan-Ensure average outgoing quality level:
1.
Use the Dodge-Romig inspection table for single sampling plans for LTPD = 1%
2.
Look at the row for a lot size between 7,001 and 10,000
3.
Look at the column for a process average between 0.41% and 0.5% because the supplier’s
process average is 0.5%
4.
n = 1500, c = 10, LTPD = 0.47%
2.
You are a Quality Control Manager for a top-tier global electronics firm, and you're in charge of
devising sampling methods for crucial features that might lead to severe failures in a new smart
device. The device components will come from three different suppliers, each providing varying
batch sizes. For each specified batch size, formulate a single sampling method using MIL-STD-
105E (Level II). The plan should outline the sample code letter, the sample size, and both the
acceptance (Ac) and rejection (Re) figures
a.
Supplier A: N = 3,000, AQL = 0.65
Sample code letter: K
Sample size: 125
Ac/Re: 2/3
b.
Supplier B: N = 1,100, AQL = 1.0
Sample code letter: J
Sample size: 80
Ac/Re: 2/3
c.
Supplier C: N = 3,500, AQL = 1.5
Sample code letter: L
Sample size: 200
Ac/Re: 7/8
As you progress in your review of supplier deliverables, you discern that adjustments to the
sampling methods are in order. Considering the performance data of the suppliers, how would
you adjust the sampling approach?
d.
Supplier A: worsened quality performance
e.
Supplier B: 12 consecutive lots accepted
f.
Supplier C: 40% of lots rejected
3.
You are a Quality Assurance Manager at ElectraTech, a leading electronics manufacturer. Your
company has recently entered into a contract with a new supplier who provides integrated
circuits for your latest smart device. The supplier sends shipments in lots of 10,000 circuits.
Based on preliminary assessments, you decide to randomly sample 100 circuits from each lot to
check for defects. The shipment is approved if there are 2 or fewer defective circuits in the
sample. However, from your past experience and initial tests, you estimate that about 1% of the
circuits in any given lot might be defective. Given this scenario:
a.
Determine the Average Outgoing Quality (AOQ) for the lots after your inspection.
P
a
=
P
{
d ≤
2
}
=
∑
d
=
0
2
100
!
d !
(
100
−
d
)
!
(
0.01
)
d
(
0.99
)
100
−
d
¿
100
!
0
!
100
!
(
0.01
)
0
(
0.99
)
100
+
100
!
1
!
99
!
(
0.01
)
1
(
0.99
)
99
+
100
!
2
!
100
!
(
0.01
)
2
(
0.99
)
98
=
0.92
AOQ
=
P
a
p
(
N
−
n
)
N
=
P
a
p
=
0.92
∗
0.01
(
10000
−
100
)
10000
=
0.0091
b.
Calculate the Average Total Inspection (ATI) you expect to perform on each lot
ATI
=
n
+
(
1
−
P
a
)
(
N
−
n
)
=
100
+
(
1
−
0.92
) (
10000
−
100
)
=
892
4.
You are the Quality Assurance Manager at ToyCrafters, a company renowned for its high-quality
toy cars. To ensure the safety and reliability of the toy cars, the wheels sourced from a supplier
must pass rigorous testing. A wheel is considered defective if it comes off the car during standard
play scenarios. To maintain the brand's reputation, the quality assurance process involves a two-
stage sampling of the wheels. In the initial stage, a sample of 20 wheels is tested. If any wheel in
this sample is found to be defective (i.e., c1 =0), a second sample of 40 wheels is drawn for
testing. The combined lot is only accepted if 2 or fewer wheels (i.e., c2 =2) from the total 60
sampled wheels are found defective. Given the historical data showing a defect probability (pd)
of 1% for these wheels:
a.
Calculate the Average Sample Number (ASN) considering the two-stage sampling
process.
n1 = 20
c1 = 0
n2 = 40
c2 = 2
pd = 0.01
5.
A leading toy manufacturer purchases plastic material from a supplier to create durable toy
figurines. The manufacturer has set a specification where the material should be able to
withstand a weight of at least 50 pounds before showing signs of deformation. If 2% or less of
the tested samples deform under this weight, the manufacturer wishes to approve the batch
with a probability of 0.90. However, if 10% or more of the samples deform under the given
weight, the manufacturer wants to reject the batch with a probability of 0.90.
a.
Determine the appropriate Procedure 1 sampling plan
The plan:
1.
To find the sample size and k value, we draw a line connecting the point 0.02 on the fraction
defective scale in figure 16.2 (nomograph for designing variables sampling plan) to the point
0.90 on the probability acceptance scale.
2.
Draw a similar line connecting the points 0.1 on the fraction defective scale and 0.10 on the
probability acceptance scale
3.
At the intersection between the two lines, you get a k value of 1.68.
a.
If σ is unknown, follow the curved line from the intersection point to the upper sample
size scale gives n = 24.
b.
If σ is known, drop vertically down from the intersection point to the sigma-known
scale and it’ll give you a sample size n = 11.
4.
Calculate
Z
LSL
=
´
x
−
LSL
s
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help