ISE235-HW3-solutions
.pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
San Jose State University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
235
Subject
Industrial Engineering
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
Pages
5
Uploaded by NickTian
1
ISE 235 Homework Assignment #4
–
Due 11:59 PM on October 26, 2020
NOTE:
Most HW problems are exercises of the textbook.
Some students may have
the 7
th
, 6
th
or 5
th
Edition while some others may have the 8
th
Edition, which is the most
recent edition and is the edition being sold at the Spartans Bookstore.
Any of these
four editions should suffice for the course.
To avoid confusion, the first sentence of
every HW problem assigned from the textbook will be stated as part of the HW
problem specification.
Problem #1
:
(3-D Charts)
In this problem, wafer is processed one at a time by a machine.
(They are not processed in a group or lot.) Within-piece variability is important and is to
be tracked by a within-piece range
𝑅
𝑊
chart. In addition, the process mean is to be
monitored with an individual
X
chart and piece-to-piece variability is to be monitored with
a moving range
𝑅
𝑃,𝑀
chart, with a moving window size of 2.
Part (a)
: Suppose that process mean
𝜇
is 100. Suppose also that the piece-to-piece
variability follows a Normal distribution with mean 0 and standard deviation
σ
𝑃
=2
.
Finally, suppose that within-piece variability follows a Normal distribution with mean 0
and standard deviation
σ
𝑊
=1
. Develop the control limits for the three charts.
2
Part (b)
: Suppose now that none of three process parameters are known and that five
measurements have been collected at five different locations on each of 30 wafers. The
collected data are organized in a 30 by 5 matrix, as shown in a companion Excel file entitled
ISE235-Problem#1-3D charts-with known parameters and with estimated parameters
Develop the control limits for the three control charts. Also, plot on the three control charts
the corresponding statistics for the 30 samples. Check if any of the plotted points fall
outside of any of the control limits of the three control chart.
Part (c):
Now suppose that the five locational data are mistaken for data collected on five
different wafers and the five phantom wafers constitute a subgroup (i.e., a sample of five
wafers). Develop the control limits for the resulting
𝑋
̅
and
R
charts. Then, plot on the two
control charts the corresponding statistics for the 30 samples. Then, check if any of the
plotted points fall outside of any of the control limits of the two control chart. If so, explain
what led to the control limit violations.
Solutions for part (b) and part (c): please refer to
ISE235-HW4.1-3D charts-with known parameters and with estimated parameters-solution.xlsx
ISE235-HW4.1-3D charts-with known parameters and with estimated parameters-solution-estimated
parameters.doc
ISE235-HW4.1-3D charts-with known parameters and with estimated parameters-solution-WRONG
charts.doc
Problem #2:
Part (a):
The data in the companion data table represent the results of inspecting all units
of a personal computer produced for the past ten days. Does the process appear to be in
control?
Please use the Excel data table provided on this class website.
ISE235-Problem#2-data-table-PC inspection
3
Part (b):
Construct a
standardized control chart
for the data of Part (a).
Problem #3:
Surface defects have been counted on 25 rectangular steel plates, and the data
are shown in the companion data table. Set up a control chart for nonconformities using
these data. Does the process producing the plates appear to be in statistical control?
Please use the Excel data table provided on this class website.
ISE235-Problem#3-data-table-surface defects
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help