Assignment-1
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Durham College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
CCNA 101
Subject
Information Systems
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
9
Uploaded by MegaPowerSquid41
Student ID: - 100953319
Name: - Ishan Dharmeshkumar Shah
Subject: - Law and Ethics in forensic investigation
Assignment-1
1.
Case 2: - Linking Public Data Sets
2.
Ethical Principles in "Linking Public Data Sets" Case:
1. Privacy and Consent (ACM Code: Principle 1.2):
Quinn's
tool
emphasizes
the
importance
of
privacy
by
combining
genetic
test
results,
me
dical
diagnoses,
and
demographic
information.
Ethical
issues
here
are
based
on
the
adeq
uacy
of
the
information
provided
to
research
participants.
It
asks
whether
participants
ar
e
fully
informed
about
how
their
data
will
be
used
and
whether
the
risk
of
re-
identification
has
been
addressed
during
the
consent
period.
Adherence
to
the
principle
of
informed
consent
is
essential
to
protecting
the
rights
and
privacy
of
individuals
partici
pating
in
research.
2. Data Anonymization and Integrity (ACM Code: Principle 1.6):
The accuracy of
statistics
anonymization comes
beneath
scrutiny in
this example
,
mainly
because of
a
disorder
in Quinn's
device
leading
to
faulty
fits
.
this case
underscores
the ethical
duty
to
hold
facts
integrity
during
the
research
procedure
.
precept
1.6 stresses the
importance
of
employing
sturdy
anonymization
strategies
to
assure
good enough
privateness
safety
. The inadvertent
publicity
of inaccuracies in
information
anonymization
raises
moral
concerns
, emphasizing the
want
for stringent measures to
make sure
the integrity of
research
data
.
3. Transparent Communication (ACM Code: Principle 2.5):
Transparent conversation emerges as a pivotal ethical principle in Quinn's state of affairs,
in which the integration of various datasets demands openness with looking at participants. The volume to which contributors were informed approximately information utilization and the capability dangers of re-identity will become a critical ethical difficulty. principle 2. 5 underscores the importance of clear and honest verbal exchange, ensuring that individuals are completely aware of how their data contributes to analyze and the associated privacy implications. This transparency is essential for constructing agreeing with and upholding ethical standards.
Additional Ethical Principles from Other Sources:
1. Informed Consent (Legal Ethics):
prison
ethics
places
a profound emphasis
at the
precept
of
informed
consent. It
calls for
that
have a look at
contributors
get all
essential
facts
, so
they may be
absolutely
aware about
the nature
,
dreams
, and
feasible
hazards
of the
research
. Upholding
individuals
' autonomy and
making sure
recognition
of the
outcomes
tied to
records
linking
turns into
a foundational
ethical
and
criminal
duty
in the
realm of
prison
ethics.
2. Fairness and Equity (Societal Ethics):
From a societal ethics
perspective
,
fairness
and
fairness
come into play. Quinn
needs
to
ensure
that the linking of
statistics
units
does
now not
disproportionately
affect
certain
people
or
groups
. The
blessings
and
dangers
of the
research
must
be
disbursed
fairly
, and the
capacity
societal implications of the
studies
should
be
considered
.
3. Accountability (Professional Ethics):
Societal ethics introduces the
concepts
of
fairness
and
equity
into Quinn's
ethical
considerations
. The linking of
statistics
sets
need to
be
carried out
in a
way
that avoids disproportionate
impacts
on
unique
people
or
groups
.
making sure
a
fair
distribution of
advantages
and
dangers
associated with
the
research
is
vital
.
moreover
, societal implications,
both
fantastic
and
poor
,
must
be
carefully
weighed to
save you
unintentional
outcomes
and
sell
moral
practices
within the
broader social context.
Integration of Principles:
The ethical landscape surrounding the linkage of public statistics sets needs a holistic integration of ideas through Quinn. A steadfast commitment to privateness ought to manual Quinn's movements, emphasizing obvious communique practices and meticulous interest to making sure informed consent from study contributors. The duty to uphold statistics integrity and safeguard people' rights is going beyond professional codes, extending to conform with criminal requirements and societal expectations. This incorporated technique guarantees that ethical concerns are woven into everything of Quinn's studies endeavors, fostering agreement with, transparency, and responsible research practices.
The interconnectedness
of those
standards
underscores the complexity of
moral
selection
-making in
research
. Balancing the pursuit of
knowledge
with
the moral
remedy
of
participants
calls for
a
thoughtful
and multifaceted
approach
.
it's
miles
vital
for
specialists
like Quinn to
constantly
reflect
on and
combine
ethical
principles
into their
work
, fostering
believe
, transparency, and
responsible
research
practices.
3.
Discussing the Ethical Perspective:
In the case study "Linking Public Data Sets," ethical considerations are central to the decision of releasing the source code for peer review. Here are points to consider:
1. Informed Consent and Privacy (ACM Code of Ethics, Principle 2.3):
Studies
ethics
concerning
scientific
records
must
be
accepted
, a
manner
mentioned
within the
Belmont
record
– Ethics and
recommendations
for
defensive
studies
Ethics
men and women
. Quinn's
technique
should
be evaluated to
determine
whether
it complies with the
standards
of
privateness
and consent of
individuals
taking part
in
studies
. This
must
make certain
that
individuals
understand
the
reason
,
dangers
, and
benefits
of the
research
and that their consent is
obtained
voluntarily and
with out
coercion,
requirements
of
practice
set out
inside the
Belmont
report
.
Reference: [The Belmont Report - Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research] (https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html)
2. Transparency and Openness (ACM Code of Ethics, Principle 2.4):
Compare Quinn's choice to make the source code to be had to the moral fashionable of transparency and openness in research strategies, as said in the Transparency and Openness advertising (top) recommendations. Quinn's concept must be evaluated to confirm whether or not it fosters consideration and responsibility inside the therapeutic community by using enabling others to study and replica the look at findings. This guarantees that research techniques and effects are openly on hand, facilitating collaboration, reproducibility, and the improvement of information.
Reference: [Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines](https://www.cos.io/our-services/top-guidelines)
3. Data Anonymization and De-identification (ACM Code of Ethics, Principle 1.6):
The
countrywide
Institute of
requirements
and
era
(NIST) - An
introduction
to
privateness
Engineering and
danger
management
in Federal
systems
, takes
into account
the moral
ramifications of
records
anonymization
within the
examine
.
verify
whether or not
the
bug
in the
tool
compromises the
privacy
guarantees
of the
original
datasets,
doubtlessly
main
to the re-
identification
of
people
and the unauthorized disclosure of
touchy
statistics
.
This
evaluation
is
crucial
to
guarantee
that
facts
anonymization
methods
effectively
pres
erve
privacy
,
help
research
integrity,
and adhere
to
moral
recommendations
.
Reference: [National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) - An Introduction to Privacy Engineering and Risk Management in Federal Systems]
(https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-53/rev-5/final)
4. Peer Review and Responsible Research (ACM Code of Ethics, Principle 2.2):
Analyze whether Quinn's peer evaluation idea is steady with ethical tips for accountable research and adheres to the concepts of clinical subject outlined in the Committee on book Ethics (COPE) - Peer Reviewer hints. evaluate Quinnand#039's technique to evaluation evaluation to ensure integrity, impartiality and confidentiality, even if it offers tremendous remarks that highlights the delight and validity of the take a look at. This evaluation is important to hold the credibility and credibility of medical publications and to hold moral standards in the medical community.
Reference: [Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) - Guidelines for Peer Reviewers](https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/guidelines-
peer-reviewers)
Ensure that your analysis considers the specific nuances of the case study and how the decisions made align with broader ethical principles in research and data handling.
4.
Prespective of different social people and players Perspective 1: Individual Harmed by the Decision/Actions
As an individual whose data is part of the linked public datasets, I feel violated and betrayed. Despite the assurances of anonymity, the bug in Quinn's tool and the subsequent decision to release the source code have put my privacy at risk. The potential for re-identification raises concerns about the misuse of my personal information. I trusted that participating in the study would contribute to scientific knowledge while safeguarding my privacy. The decision to release the source code without adequate precautions disregards the potential harm to individuals like me. It's unsettling to think that my data, even if anonymized, may now be vulnerable to exposure, and this erodes the trust I had in the research process. Researchers should prioritize the protection of participants and reconsider their actions to ensure the ethical
treatment of individuals involved in their studies.
Perspective 2: Company Not Harmed by the Decision/Actions
As a company unaffected by Quinn's decision, our primary concern is maintaining the integrity of our data. We understand the importance of research but believe that the decision to release the source code without thorough risk assessment poses a threat to data security. Even if our data is not directly involved in this instance, the precedent set
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help