Assignment-1

.docx

School

Durham College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

CCNA 101

Subject

Information Systems

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

9

Uploaded by MegaPowerSquid41

Report
Student ID: - 100953319 Name: - Ishan Dharmeshkumar Shah Subject: - Law and Ethics in forensic investigation Assignment-1 1. Case 2: - Linking Public Data Sets 2. Ethical Principles in "Linking Public Data Sets" Case: 1. Privacy and Consent (ACM Code: Principle 1.2): Quinn's tool emphasizes the importance of privacy by combining genetic test results, me dical diagnoses, and demographic information. Ethical issues here are based on the adeq uacy of the information provided to research participants. It asks whether participants ar e fully informed about how their data will be used and whether the risk of re- identification has been addressed during the consent period. Adherence to the principle of informed consent is essential to protecting the rights and privacy of individuals partici pating in research. 2. Data Anonymization and Integrity (ACM Code: Principle 1.6): The accuracy of statistics anonymization comes beneath scrutiny in this example , mainly because of a disorder in Quinn's device leading to faulty fits . this case underscores the ethical duty to hold facts integrity during the research procedure . precept 1.6 stresses the importance of employing sturdy anonymization strategies to assure good enough privateness safety . The inadvertent publicity of inaccuracies in information anonymization raises moral concerns , emphasizing the want for stringent measures to make sure the integrity of research data . 3. Transparent Communication (ACM Code: Principle 2.5): Transparent conversation emerges as a pivotal ethical principle in Quinn's state of affairs, in which the integration of various datasets demands openness with looking at participants. The volume to which contributors were informed approximately information utilization and the capability dangers of re-identity will become a critical ethical difficulty. principle 2. 5 underscores the importance of clear and honest verbal exchange, ensuring that individuals are completely aware of how their data contributes to analyze and the associated privacy implications. This transparency is essential for constructing agreeing with and upholding ethical standards.
Additional Ethical Principles from Other Sources: 1. Informed Consent (Legal Ethics): prison ethics places a profound emphasis at the precept of informed consent. It calls for that have a look at contributors get all essential facts , so they may be absolutely aware about the nature , dreams , and feasible hazards of the research . Upholding individuals ' autonomy and making sure recognition of the outcomes tied to records linking turns into a foundational ethical and criminal duty in the realm of prison ethics. 2. Fairness and Equity (Societal Ethics): From a societal ethics perspective , fairness and fairness come into play. Quinn needs to ensure that the linking of statistics units does now not disproportionately affect certain people or groups . The blessings and dangers of the research must be disbursed fairly , and the capacity societal implications of the studies should be considered . 3. Accountability (Professional Ethics): Societal ethics introduces the concepts of fairness and equity into Quinn's ethical considerations . The linking of statistics sets need to be carried out in a way that avoids disproportionate impacts on unique people or groups . making sure a fair distribution of advantages and dangers associated with the research is vital . moreover , societal implications, both fantastic and poor , must be carefully weighed to save you unintentional outcomes and sell moral practices within the broader social context. Integration of Principles: The ethical landscape surrounding the linkage of public statistics sets needs a holistic integration of ideas through Quinn. A steadfast commitment to privateness ought to manual Quinn's movements, emphasizing obvious communique practices and meticulous interest to making sure informed consent from study contributors. The duty to uphold statistics integrity and safeguard people' rights is going beyond professional codes, extending to conform with criminal requirements and societal expectations. This incorporated technique guarantees that ethical concerns are woven into everything of Quinn's studies endeavors, fostering agreement with, transparency, and responsible research practices. The interconnectedness of those standards underscores the complexity of moral selection -making in research . Balancing the pursuit of knowledge with the moral remedy of participants calls for a thoughtful and multifaceted approach . it's
miles vital for specialists like Quinn to constantly reflect on and combine ethical principles into their work , fostering believe , transparency, and responsible research practices. 3. Discussing the Ethical Perspective: In the case study "Linking Public Data Sets," ethical considerations are central to the decision of releasing the source code for peer review. Here are points to consider: 1. Informed Consent and Privacy (ACM Code of Ethics, Principle 2.3): Studies ethics concerning scientific records must be accepted , a manner mentioned within the Belmont record – Ethics and recommendations for defensive studies Ethics men and women . Quinn's technique should be evaluated to determine whether it complies with the standards of privateness and consent of individuals taking part in studies . This must make certain that individuals understand the reason , dangers , and benefits of the research and that their consent is obtained voluntarily and with out coercion, requirements of practice set out inside the Belmont report . Reference: [The Belmont Report - Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research] (https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html) 2. Transparency and Openness (ACM Code of Ethics, Principle 2.4): Compare Quinn's choice to make the source code to be had to the moral fashionable of transparency and openness in research strategies, as said in the Transparency and Openness advertising (top) recommendations. Quinn's concept must be evaluated to confirm whether or not it fosters consideration and responsibility inside the therapeutic community by using enabling others to study and replica the look at findings. This guarantees that research techniques and effects are openly on hand, facilitating collaboration, reproducibility, and the improvement of information. Reference: [Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines](https://www.cos.io/our-services/top-guidelines) 3. Data Anonymization and De-identification (ACM Code of Ethics, Principle 1.6): The countrywide Institute of requirements and era (NIST) - An introduction to privateness Engineering and danger management in Federal systems , takes into account the moral ramifications of records anonymization within the examine . verify whether or not the bug in the tool compromises the privacy guarantees of the original datasets, doubtlessly main to the re- identification of people and the unauthorized disclosure of touchy statistics .
This evaluation is crucial to guarantee that facts anonymization methods effectively pres erve privacy , help research integrity, and adhere to moral recommendations . Reference: [National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) - An Introduction to Privacy Engineering and Risk Management in Federal Systems] (https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-53/rev-5/final) 4. Peer Review and Responsible Research (ACM Code of Ethics, Principle 2.2): Analyze whether Quinn's peer evaluation idea is steady with ethical tips for accountable research and adheres to the concepts of clinical subject outlined in the Committee on book Ethics (COPE) - Peer Reviewer hints. evaluate Quinnand#039's technique to evaluation evaluation to ensure integrity, impartiality and confidentiality, even if it offers tremendous remarks that highlights the delight and validity of the take a look at. This evaluation is important to hold the credibility and credibility of medical publications and to hold moral standards in the medical community. Reference: [Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) - Guidelines for Peer Reviewers](https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/guidelines- peer-reviewers) Ensure that your analysis considers the specific nuances of the case study and how the decisions made align with broader ethical principles in research and data handling. 4. Prespective of different social people and players Perspective 1: Individual Harmed by the Decision/Actions As an individual whose data is part of the linked public datasets, I feel violated and betrayed. Despite the assurances of anonymity, the bug in Quinn's tool and the subsequent decision to release the source code have put my privacy at risk. The potential for re-identification raises concerns about the misuse of my personal information. I trusted that participating in the study would contribute to scientific knowledge while safeguarding my privacy. The decision to release the source code without adequate precautions disregards the potential harm to individuals like me. It's unsettling to think that my data, even if anonymized, may now be vulnerable to exposure, and this erodes the trust I had in the research process. Researchers should prioritize the protection of participants and reconsider their actions to ensure the ethical treatment of individuals involved in their studies. Perspective 2: Company Not Harmed by the Decision/Actions As a company unaffected by Quinn's decision, our primary concern is maintaining the integrity of our data. We understand the importance of research but believe that the decision to release the source code without thorough risk assessment poses a threat to data security. Even if our data is not directly involved in this instance, the precedent set
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help