EBP
.pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Houston *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
392
Subject
Information Systems
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
Pages
3
Uploaded by perlareaidy
Setting:
ASPIRE LLC - ABA Therapy
Stakeholders:
Dr. Laura Estep: Clinical Supervisor
Ms. Allison Gouris: Co-CEO, BCBA
Ms. Kristi Swice: Co-CEO, BCBA
Gaps Identified by Key Stakeholders:
By allowing clients to dictate hours based on their availability pushes technicians to take hours
outside of their availability, which also leads to technicians unable to achieve desired hours.
Many hours needed are for after school ABA care, where they have a high need for technicians
for 3:30-8:00 pm and the weekends. These times are difficult to staff, as many technicians want
earlier hours and/or weekends off so having these hours open may leave us asking technicians to
work outside of availability or have limited hours to accommodate for the times they are
available to work. We have discussed having blocked schedules clients choose from, such as
having a 3:30-6:30 or 4:30-7:30 gap, however, this limits client choice and may prevent possible
sessions, which would employ techs. Blocked scheduling seemed to be a recurring theme and
could be beneficial for employees so that they may see their schedule and have time for
paperwork, supervision, insurance, and even direct therapy, as these will be listed in their
schedules.
Goal:
Create a balance of schedules that employees and clients are comfortable with, where employees
are within their availability and are able support themselves financially/are not worried about
their next paycheck if they are based on hourly wages rather than salary.
Protocols:
1.
CDC Rrecommended Program: NIOSH Healthy Work Design and Well-being Program
a.
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/index.htm
2.
Block Scheduling
a.
https://www.audigy.com/blog/harnessing-the-power-of-block-scheduling/#:~:text
=With%20this%20type%20of%20schedule,activities%20and%20other%20practic
e%20priorities
.
3.
Work-Life Balance Scheduling
a.
Koruca, H. İ., Emek, M. S., & Gulmez, E. (2023). Development of a new
personalized staff-scheduling method with a work-life balance perspective: case
of a hospital. Annals of operations research, 1–28. Advance online publication.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05244-2
Appraisal of Work-Life Balance Scheduling:
The text adequately describes the problem of work-life balance in healthcare settings,
emphasizing the need for efficient scheduling to improve job satisfaction and reduce burnout
among healthcare staff. The text mentions existing literature on work-life balance issues but does
not explicitly discuss the use of a specific theory of change. The focus is on introducing a new
software tool and scheduling methods. The text does not provide information about a QI team. It
primarily focuses on the methodology and software tool developed for scheduling. The article
does not detail specific methods used for root cause analysis. While the text mentions scheduling
methods and a software tool, it does not explicitly state the use of a recognized QI model like
Lean or PDSA. The primary intervention discussed is the implementation of the WLB-Tool and
scheduling methods. The description of interventions could be more detailed. The article does
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help