ACTG Assignment
.pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Carleton University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
000
Subject
Law
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
Pages
4
Uploaded by CommodoreProton13336
ACTG 2P40
ASSIGNMENT NO. 1
1.
After reading the following case regarding the Welland fire that occurred on August 1st, 2023,
and examining the evidence and facts presented I was able to determine who will endure the
liabilities and fault of the damages that occurred during the fire. Andrea, the owner of the Coffee
Shop on 52 Main Street that was damaged in the fire has the complete right to seek legal action
against Bill, the owner of the Home Depot where the fire originated. My reasoning for this will
be explained as I discuss the following legal actions Andrea should consider against Bill for his
part in the cause of the fire.
Firstly Andrea has the right to take legal action against Bill for his negligence in causing the fire
although unintentional, his carelessness was a major factor in the origin of the fire which
ultimately led to Andrea's property being damaged which also caused mental anguish that affects
her life on a daily basis. Bill was negligent in leaving a shed with flammable and combustible
chemicals unlocked and unmaintained which made the shed and its contents easily accessible to
anyone as the shed was located in an unfenced area. He failed to show a duty of care as he knew
an employee was smoking in the shed with combustible chemicals, and other people were
accessing the shed and his careless actions ended up harming others. He failed to meet the
standard of care required of a store manager, as a manager he is aware that he is responsible for
his property and also the actions of his employees. He failed to fulfill his duties in ensuring his
property was secured and that his employees were following safety regulations. The fire caused
considerable damage to Andrea’s business, it destroyed the structure of the coffee shop which
ended up totaling $1,000,000 in damage to the building itself, the fire also damaged around
$500,000 in inventory which totals the physical damage at a cost of $1,500,000. This is only
considering the monetary value lost, as a result of the fire that destroyed Andrea’s livelihood, she
has developed severe mental anguish that affects her every day. The trauma has caused her to
develop a fear of sirens and in turn, she is afraid to leave her house in the event that she hears
sirens, the sounds bring her back to the day she lost her business. Bill’s actions being negligent in
leaving the shed unlocked and unsecured with knowledge people were accessing it was a
principal cause of the damage that Andrea suffered as a result of this fire. Had Bill fulfilled his
responsibilities as store manager and taken more appropriate steps to mitigate the risk of people
accessing the shed with flammable chemicals, and stopped his employee from smoking in the
shed, this fire certainly wouldn’t have happened. Andrea would likely be compensated for the
$1,500,000 loss, and also be compensated for the emotional damage endured after the fire.
Another thing that Andrea should consider is pursuing legal action against Bill for Unlawful
Interference with her business's economic relations. Bill is making a deliberate attempt to
interfere with Andrea’s current coffee supply contracts and is also making comments that could
potentially discourage any potential business. Bill is trying to interfere by offering discounts on
Home Depot supplies in turn for Andrea’s current clients to cancel their contracts with her. This
deliberate attempt to interfere with Andrea’s business can be seen as an attempt to bribe clients
into not doing business with Andrea. The offer of a discount on supplies to her clients would
directly cause a loss of business for Andrea, and the defamation of calling her a bad business
owner could also directly cause a loss of any current or future business. Bill’s attempt to
deliberately interfere with Andrea’s business falls within the criteria of unlawful interference
with economic relations. Andrea should pursue legal action against Bill to not only seek legal
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help