TABL2751 Tutorial Questions
docx
School
University of New South Wales *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
2751
Subject
Law
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
25
Uploaded by BrigadierLlama3273
WEEK 1: TUTORIAL QUESTIONS QUESTION 1
The Full High Court was hearing this case
o
The Federal Court already heard this case in which her appeal was rejected
o
QUESTION 2
1.
The primary sources of taxation law are through state law and case law
2.
ATO Rulings, Determinations and Guidelines should be used as supplementary material to primary sources of taxation. They are also simply interpretations of the law and legally binding only on the ATO
3.
You calculate tax liability through 7 steps and can be found in the ITAA97 s4-10(3)
o
Taxable Income * Rate – Tax Offset
4.
You can calculate taxable income through ITAA97 s4-15
o
Taxable Income = Assessable Income - Deductions
5.
Assessable Income is Ordinary and Statutory Income
ITAA97 s6-1
a.
Statutory Income are things like capital gains
6.
Doctrine of Precedent
Lower courts must follow the higher courts’ decisions
7.
A social good is something that benefits the largest number of people in the largest possible way like air whilst a merit good is a good that benefits not only the consumer but also the wider society e.g. education
QUESTION 3
Personal Taxable Income
o
22000-4200 = 17800
Business Taxable Income
o
170000-84000 = 86000
Total Taxable Income: = 103800
Tax Liability: 5092 + 0.325*(103800-45000) = 24202
Tax Offset:
1500 - (103800-90000)*0.03 = 1086
HELP Liability
7% * 103800 = 7266
Medicare Levy
2%*103800 = 2076
1%*103800 = 1038
Total Tax Liability: 24202-1086+7266+1038+2076 = 33496
QUESTION 4
QUESTION 5
A) Yes this is considered ordinary income because a salary is firstly realised gains, has sufficient nexus with the earning activity which her role as a chief accountant for a company. Similarly, a salary indicates that she receives this monetary compensation periodically and regularly
B) o
Taxable Income: 220000
o
Medicare Levy: 2%*220000 = 4400
o
HELP Deb: 220000*10% = 22000
Thus HELP debt is 8500
o
Tax Liability: 51667 + 0.45*(220000-180000) = 69667
o
Total Tax Liability = 69667 + 8500 + 4400 = 82567
QUESTION 6
Because assessable income is less than deductions, we have a loss and thus we do not have a taxable income
Tax Loss would be 2500
Deductions – Taxable Income – Net Exempt Income
o
22500-18000-2000 = 2500
QUESTION 8
Question is looking for capital vs income
Compensation: 100,000
Contract: 15% of operations
Potential Revenue Lost: 150000
Material Facts:
Taking up 15% of the manufacturing capacity, 100K compensation, and lost potential revenue of 150K
Capital vs Income
NEED TO ASK IF IT AFFECTS THE PROFIT MAKING STRUCTURE IS KEPT INTACT, THEN IT IS CONSIDERED INCOME
Compensation paid or when profit making structure is impacted
15% is not significant
The compensation in this case is a substitute for income
However, if for example the contract cancellation caused the business to go bankrupt, then the cancellation would be considered capital. In this scenario, it is likely that the company will be able to continue operations and not be significantly affected despite the contract being cancelled.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
WEEK 2 TUTORIAL QUESTIONS
QUESTION 1
Under ITAA97 s6-1, assessable income has two components, namely ordinary income and statutory income. Philip’s wages during the specified period of $9600 are considered ordinary income through personal exertion (his labour). Furthermore, the payments were of a regular nature and directly related to his employment. In addition, Phillip was also provided tips of around $30 to $50 each shift. The amount assumed totally for his tips was 3200. The nature of voluntary payments must be addressed to determine its classification as ordinary income. Since the tips are directly related to his performance as a waiter, the voluntary payment is not considered simply a “mere gift” and thus will be considered ordinary income
Tax ruling 95-11
tips from hospitality are ordinary income
Think of Scott vs FCT
Phillip received a bonus by his employer of $500. This was due to his superior performance for the month and whilst this was a one off payment, lacking regularity and reoccurrence, its nature as a bonus directly related to his work will render it to be considered ordinary income.
Phillip received a non-transferrable $200 gift voucher to the UNSW bookshop due to receiving the highest mark in the subject of “advanced taxation”. Although this is not considered a windfall gain, the prize was a result of his skill and hard work. Parallels can be drawn when considering how prizes can be won by athletes and other sport persons. Whilst in the Stone vs FCT case, the prize for winning a Javelin throw contest could be
considered ordinary income due to her nature of being in the “business of sport”, Phillip is not in the business of studying and the prize is unlikely to be reoccurring. Thus, the prize won by Phillip is not considered ordinary income.
Phillip’s youth allowance of $2400 would be considered ordinary income because it is on a reoccurring and regular basis, in which he utilises for expenditure and consumption
Similar to his wages from his waiter job, the 80,000 earned from his salary as a graduate accountant will also be considered ordinary income from personal exertion. However, since Philip operates on a cash basis, his taxable income will only include the $33,000 received by June 30, 2023.
His superannuation fund contribution by his employer of 8000 will not be considered ordinary income but rather treated as income to be taxed under the superannuation fund
taxed in the hands of the superfund
money goes directly into superfund and taxed at 15%
According to ITAA97 s6-5
o
The wages of 9600 are considered ordinary income
o
Tips of 3200 are ordinary income
o
Prize/Bonus of 500 is considered ordinary income according to ITAA97 s15-75
According to ITAA97 s6-15
o
The prize of 200 is not considered ordinary income
Under ITAA97 52-15,
o
Youth allowance is not considered ordinary income and is exempt from taxation
Under s6-5,
o
His salary of 33,000 Is considered ordinary income
Under
Assessable Income: $48,700
QUESTION 2
Purchases property for 300k
Borrows 280k at 7%
Cyril borrows 280,000
expense
deduction
Annual payment of $5000 for the right to locate windmills is considered ordinary income under ordinary precepts of annuities
not royalties because they are not paid on a per usage basis
800K is not considered income to Cyril but rather to the company. 120K is considered ordinary income
Cancellation of contract: Considered income because the cancellation of contract would not drastically affect the operation of the business
would be taxed on the individual to Cyril due to constructive receipts
QUESTION 3
Income from resident occupancy fees
Subsidy of $470,000
Cash from tenant 10,500 due to repair
One of the issues: Is Holmes carrying on a business?
The question does not say that Holmes is non-profit so it is likely that it is for profit
o
Has occupancy fees
o
In the business of nursing home
Weekly subsidy
The subsidies are income because if they were not in the business of nursing homes, they would not be receiving the subsidy
They are also operating in the structure of a business
Cash from tenant
15-25
considered ordinary income because the entity paid the 10,500 amount for failing to comply with a lease obligation to make repair to the premises.
CLASS DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
QUESTION 1
If it was a membership
generally revenue is unearned revenue
Small businesses are unlikely to have debtors and thus would be on cash basis
If you have circulating capital, creditors, debtors, machinery, rotating stock
accrual basis
Sole practitioners are generally on a cash basis e.g. café
QUESTION 2
1.
Cash Basis: 492K
2.
Accruals Basis: 500K
QUESTION 3
Cash prize won in a lottery lacks commercial element and relies on good luck and fortune
Cash prize won in an art competition by a professional artist would be considered an ordinary income and is engaged in the business of a “professional artist”
so joining an art competition would be considered in relation to their income producing and business activities o
Parallels to Stones case.
A house provided to a security guard rent free, which is situated on the employer’s premises is not considered ordinary income but rather a fringe benefit o
Section 15-2
o
21-A
WEEK 3 TUTORIAL QUESTIONS
Capital Gains Discount:
o
Individuals: 50%
o
Companies: None
o
Superfunds: 1/3
33.33%
There are 13 CGT events
o
Event starts on the date of contract
If no contract
the d ate of the change in ownership
Must apply discounts at the VERY END when you do the method statement (step 3)
When doing questions
o
Find capital gain/loss
o
Exemptions
o
Discounts
QUESTION 1
For the following sections, all references are directed towards the ITAA97 Act. House:
Mr and Mrs Smith has sold their primary place of residence for $820,000 on 1
st
March 2023. Under s108-5, this property is considered a CTG asset and the transaction a CTG A1 disposal event under s104-10. The property was not utilised to generate income and the house was the primary place of residence for the Smith family up until the point of sale. Thus, under s118-110, the house will be exempt to capital gains tax.
o
S108-7 – Joint Ownership
o
S110-35 – Incidental Costs
Capital Proceeds: $820,000 – s116-20
PAY ATTENTION TO “AND, OR” IN THE LEGISLATION
o
Cost Base: $200,000 s110-25
Cost base
o
Incidental Costs:
$2000 + $10,000 + $20,000 = $32,000
Total Capital Gains: $820,000 - $232,000 = $588,000
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
o
Need to divide by 2 because it is only for Mr Smith
o
Capital Gains for Mr Smith: $294,000
Vacant Land
On 1
st
March 2023, Mr Smith sold a plot of vacant land purchased in 1 June 1997 for $150,000. Under s108-5(1), the land sold is considered a CGT asset and this transaction again represents an A1 disposal
of property under s104-10. Under the s116-20, the capital proceeds from this CGT event are the total of the money received, or entitled to receive in respect of the event happening which totals $150,000
Under s110-25, the cost base is:
o
Proceeds: $150,000
o
Cost of Acquiring: 30,000
o
Incidental Costs: $7000
Agent Commission/Stamp Duty/Advertising: $4000 + $2000 + $1000
s110-35
o
Cost Base: $37,000
Net Capital Gain: $150,000 - $37,000 = $113,000
o
Discountable: 50%
$56,500 (BUT DO NOT DO THIS YET)
Car
On the 1
st March 2023, Mr and Mrs Smith gave their previously owned car to his son in which the market value at time of disposal was $6000. Under s118-5, the car is considered an exempt asset. Thus there is no capital gain
Proceeds: $6000
MV substitution rule o
Cost Base: $22,000
o
Loss: $16,000
Discount: Not applicable because personal use asset losses are disregarded
Vintage Car
On the 1
st
March 2023, Mr Smith sold his Vintage Car for $60,000. Under s118-5, the car is considered an exempt asset and thus there is no capital gain
Considered a personal use asset
o
108-30
Cost of ownership is disregarded for personal use asset
TD199-40
Antique?
Other Notes
o
Capital Proceeds: $60,000
o
Cost of Acquiring: $40,000
Incidental Costs: $200 o
Cost Base: $40,200
o
Capital Gain: $19800
Television
The television was sold for $200 and under s108-20 (2), it is considered a personal use asset. Since the
cost base of $1500 is below the threshold of $10,000, any capital gains would be disregarded due to its low value. However, the capital proceeds are $200 and thus represent a capital loss anyways. Furthermore, loss from personal use assets are disregarded.
Capital Loss: -1300
Painting
Mr Smith sold a painting for $18,000 with an additional $270 in commission costs. Under s100-25, collectibles including artworks which cost over $500 are considered a CGT asset. Furthermore, under s104-10, this transaction is considered a CGT disposal event and thus will be subject to capital gains tax. Under s118-10, capital gains/losses will be taxed due to its value exceeding $500.
Collectable: s108B
Capital Proceeds: $18,000
Cost Base (s110-35)
o
Cost of Acquiring: $2000
o
Incidental Costs: (Element 1 and 2) Commission of $270 o
Total Cost Base: $2270
Capital Gains: $18,000-$2,270 = $15,730
5000 Shares in ABC Ltd
5000 Shares were sold on the 1
st
of March 2023 with a sales price of $18,000. Under s100-25, shares sold are considered a CGT asset and thus the CGT event of disposal under s104-10, this transaction will be considered for capital gains tax. Furthermore, under s115-25, since the disposal of shares was under the threshold of 1 year, there will be no discount of 50% provided for the CGT.
Capital Proceeds: $18,000
Cost Base: o
Acquisition Cost: $7500
o
Incidental Costs
Brokerage: $500 + $300 = $800
o
Total Cost Base: $8,300
Capital Gains: $9,700
o
Not discountable 2000 Shares in CAB Ltd
2000 shares were sold for $8000 by Mr Smith on the 1
st
of March 2023. Under s100-25, shares sold are considered a CGT asset and thus the CGT event of disposal under s104-10, this transaction will be considered for capital gains tax. Since the shares were first acquired in 2011, under s115-25 and s115-
100, Mr Smith will receive a 50% discount on his capital gains tax.
Capital Proceeds: $8000
Cost Base
o
Cost of Acquisition: $6000
Incidental Costs
o
$200 + $400 = $600
Total Cost Base: $6600
Capital Gains: $1400
o
Discountable S102-5: Method statement for finding net capital gains
Step 1: Not applicable because we don’t have current year capital losses
Step 2: Offset the unapplied net capital losses from previous calendar years against the non-
discountable first before discountable
in this case, only the ABC shares are non-discountable
Step 3: Apply the discounts
To find net capital gains: Look at asset by asset
Step 1: NA
Step 2: $9700-$5000 = $4700
Step 3: o
Vacant Land: $113,000/2 = $56,000
o
Painting: $15,730/2 = $7865
o
CAB Share: $1400/2 = $700
ABC Share: $4700
Total Net Capital Gains: $69,265
Ask about what is the 3
rd
element mean in reduced cost base s110-55?
QUESTION 2
Melanie has sold shares from Dog Ltd for $14,000 on the 1
st
of June 2023. Since she is not considered a “share trader”, the receipts of the transactions will not be considered ordinary income according to ordinary precepts under s6-1. Under s100-25, the shares are considered a CGT asset and the sale is considered an A1 Disposal of a CGT asset under Subdivision 104-10. Since the shares were purchased in 2013, this exceeds the 1 year threshold and thus will be subject to a 50% discount under s115-25 and s115-100. Capital Proceeds: $14,000
Cost Base
Acquisition Cost: $6,000
Incidental Costs: 0
Capital Gains: $8000
Discountable
Melanie has sold shares from Cat Ltd for $18,000 on the 1
st
of June 2023. Since she is not considered a “share trader”, the receipts of the transactions will not be considered ordinary income according to ordinary precepts under s6-1. Under s100-25, the shares are considered a CGT asset and the sale is considered an A1 Disposal of a CGT asset under Subdivision 104-10. Since the shares were acquired on the 1
st
of July 2022, the duration of ownership of the shares do not exceed 12 months and thus will not be subject to a 50% discount under s115-
25.
Capital Proceeds: $18,000
Cost Base:
Acquisition Cost: $10,000
Incidental Costs: 0
Capital Gains: $8000
Not discountable
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Melanie has sold shares from Dog Ltd for $14,000 on the 1
st
of June 2023. Since she is not considered a “share trader”, the receipts of the transactions will not be considered ordinary income according to ordinary precepts under s6-1. Under s100-25, the shares are considered a CGT asset and the sale is considered an A1 Disposal of a CGT asset under Subdivision 104-10. Despite the shares being purchased in 2013, discounts do not apply to capital losses
Capital Proceeds: $5000
Cost Base:
Acquisition Cost: $8000
Incidental Costs: 0
Since capital proceeds do not exceed cost base, we need to work out the reduced cost base
Reduced Cost Base: $8000
Capital Loss: -$3000
Discounts do not apply to losses
only gains
Net Capital Gains/Loss
Step 1: $8000-3000 = $5000
Step 2: Not applicable
Step 3: Discount to Dog LTD: $8000/2
$4000
Total Capital Gains $9000
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1.
A) CGT asset and CGT event
a.
Exemption because it is a pre-cgt asset
i.
CGT assets that are before 1985 are still CGT assets
ii.
However the loss/gains will be disregarded
B) Effie enters into a contract to sell post CGT land to Anne
A1 Event, the K gain/loss will be included
C) Michael defaults on a contract to purchase Alex’s main residence and forfeits the deposit that he paid under
the contract
H1 CGT Event
Event still occurs
104-150: Forfeiture of deposit
o
H1 CGT Event is not included as part of the exemption of main residence s118-110
D) Garry disposes of trading stock to Robert on 1 December 2022
A1 but trading stock is exempt
E) Matt sells business to mad. As part of the agreement, Matt agrees not to operate a similar business within a 5km radius for the next 2 years. Mad pays Matt $10,000 to agree to this restraint.
Matt has created a contractual right
Thus a D1 occurs
restrictive covenant
o
Disregard the A1 event when he sells the business
o
Gain of $10,000 less any incidental costs
Question 2: How does the treatment of a K loss made on a collectable differ to the treatment of a K loss made on a personal use asset
Treatment of capital loss on a collectable is only to be offset by gains on collectables
Treatment of capital loss on a personal use asset is disregarded
ASSIGNMENT There is no indication of Astrid deriving any income from her regular participation and victories in her local pub
trivia nights in the last 5 years, suggesting the nature of her involvement as a hobby. Her winnings of $18,000 derived from her singular appearance on the Channel 12 TV Trivia Night is unlikely to constitute as assessable income based on IT167, whereby the nature of this scenario lacks regularity or contractual rights to make repeated appearances that would otherwise categorise the prize money as assessable income.
WEEK 4: TUTORIAL QUESTIONS
QUESTION 1
Environmental Impact Assessment
Satisfies first positive limb but is considered capital according to Dixon
o
In the case that if it was a reoccurring expense every few years, it would classify as deductible
Old Smokey Pty Ltd incurred a cost of $50,000 for the purposes of conducting an environmental impact assessment before setting up a factory. Generally, preliminary expenses are not deductible but
under ITAA97 40-880, the provision may allow the business to deduct this particular cost over 5 years.
40-755 Purchase of Trees
Old Smokey violates strict environmental guidelines from day one and they purchase the surrounding dying trees for $500,000. The expense satisfies the 2nd positive limb where the outgoing is both incidental and relevant to the taxpayer’s income producing activities as the aim was to profit from selling the trees as firewood.
The only negative limb that may be applied here is the nature of capital limb.
Consider Dixon’s Criteria from the Suns case
o
Character of Advantage Sought:
The outgoing was incurred for a short term gain (selling trees as firewood) and is unlikely to have any LT implications for the business
o
Manner in which it is relied upon or enjoyed
: The benefit is a short term benefit whereby the purchasing of the trees is likely to only provide a single monetary inflow and does not affect the main operations of the glue factory
o
Characteristic of Payment
: The payment was a lump sum singular and was not ongoing
Thus, according to the 3 criteria, despite the payment being a singular non-reoccurring lumpsum, the outgoing is unlikely to affect the capital structure and revenue generation structure of the company because they can continue to sell glue whether they bought and sold the trees or not. Thus, it is not considered capital
Notes: Could even consider it as an extra-ordinary transaction
Coolings caase
Judgement Debt of $1,000,000
It is part of your ordinary business because there is always the possibility that companies will do things like this
The payment has not been incurred yet and so they cannot deduct it
The $1,000,000 would be deductible under the hands of the liquidation creditor
The $100,000,000 is only POTENTIAL and thus is not deductible
QUESTION 2
A)
Outgoings associated with travelling to Rockhampton for her job interview valued at $400 does not satisfy the first positive limb as the outgoing was not incurred in the course of an income producing activity but incurred to attain employment. Parallels can be seen within the FCT v Maddalena case whereby travel expenses incurred by the soccer sportsman travelling to a new club were rejected as deductible expenses.
B)
Relocation costs of $3500 will not satisfy the first positive limb either as this outgoing is not incurred in gaining or producing assessable income.
expenditure is incurred too early C)
The purchase of compulsory doctor scrubs to “wear” satisfies the first positive limb because the scrubs are a necessary component that they must use and wear when conducting their income earning activities. a.
The outgoing is unlikely to be capital in nature since it is a reoccurring expense every few months
b.
Not an outgoing for private matters but rather for the professional duties of carrying out their role at work
c.
The use of the scrubs to produce ordinary income from work is not exempt income
d.
There is no provision that prevents the deductibility of this outgoing
e.
Also under 34-20
it is occupation specific and protective clothing and thus is considered deductible
D)
The cost of telephone calls to check on patients valued at $120 satisfies the first positive limb because
doctors have an obligation for the duty of care of their patients and it may extend to ensuring that they are feeling okay around the clock. These expenses are directly related to their role as a doctor and contribute directly to their income production activities. a.
The outgoing is unlikely to be capital in nature since it is a reoccurring expense b.
Not an outgoing for private matters but rather for the professional duties of carrying out their employment as a doctor doing their job to their highest possible capabilities
c.
The use of the telephone to produce ordinary income from work is not exempt income
d.
There is no provision that prevents the deductibility of this outgoing
As long as the expense is work related, it is deductible
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
E)
Purchase of meals at the hospital when working evening shifts are not deductible as it does not satisfy
the first limb whereby the doctor can easily skip a meal and still be able to produce the same amount of income if they were to take the meal. The meal is not directly linked to their income producing capacities.
F)
Travelling outgoings to and from work of $320 will not be deductible because the outgoing was not incurred in the course of an income producing activity but incurred to arrive at a location in which income producing activities would start.
Class Discussion Questions
Running vs Occupancy Expenses
Would be able to deduct 30% of internet, 15% for electricity and 10% for mobile telephone FIRST APPLY LEGISLATION AND THEN APPLY CASE LAW
WEEK 7: TUTORIAL
QUESTION 1
Question A)
Due to a fire, a machine costing $90,000 which was purchased on the 1
st
of September 2021 has been destroyed and the company has received an insurance payment of $70,000 on 1
st
March 2023. According to s40-60, the depreciating asset of 15 years will start declining in value on the day of its “start time” of 1
st
September 2021. Under 40-75, the machine may be depreciated through the prime cost method.
Asset Cost ×
Days Held
365
×
100%
Assets Effective Life
1 September 2022 – 30 June 2023
90,000
×
302
365
×
100%
15
=
$
4964.38
1 July 2023 – 1 December 2023
90,000
×
154
365
×
100%
15
=
$
2531.51
Termination Value = 82,509.58 82,509.58 – 70,000 = $12,509.58
Deductions
We can also deduct $2531.51 for the decline in value for the 2023 year Under s40-295(b) a balancing adjustment is required because the company ceases to use the asset due to its destruction. Under 40-305, the termination value of the depreciating asset is the value of the insurance payment of $70,000. Because the adjustable value of the machine exceeds the termination value, ABC Pty Ltd can claim the difference of $12,509.58 for deductions. In the case that the adjustable value was larger than the termination value, the difference would be considered assessable income. Furthermore, capital losses made from CGT event involving depreciating asset is disregarded: s 118-24.
Question B) To calculate the tax implications if the company were to utilise the diminishing value method, s40-72 can be applied, whereby the decline in value of a depreciating asset is
BaseValue×
Days Held
365
×
200%
Asse t
'
s Effective Life
1 September 2021 – 30 June 2022
90,000
×
302
365
×
200%
15
=
$
9928.767
1 July 2022 – 1 December 2023
80,071
×
153
365
×
200%
15
=
$
4475.21
Termination Value = $75,596 – $70,000 = $5596 As well as this year, in the 2023 year, $4504.46 can also be counted as a deduction for the decline in value over
the year
Hence total allowable deductions for the 2022-2023 year is $10,069.38
Thus, the decline in value of the depreciating asset will be doubled in the first year and subsequent years will have accelerated levels of depreciation that is NOT a flat rate. Using the diminishing value, since we use the base value, there will be a trickle effect whereby the majority of the asset value will be written off in the first few years.
QUESTION 2
The first negative limb of s8-1 denies the deductibility for an outgoing that is capital in nature. To determine whether the $385,000 spent on the purchase of the shop is capital in nature, one can draw a criterion based test from Dixon in the Suns Newspaper Case. The advantage sought from the transaction by nature is long term because Gino intends to run his business using the facilities of the shop for an indefinite time. Furthermore, whilst the repayments are split into $36,000 and $15,000 payments each year, the goal is to pay off a large otherwise lump-sum payment and thus the transaction can be adequately classified as capital. However, the interest on the loan of $15,000 will be deductible under s8-1 because they were incurred for the purpose of acquiring an income generating asset. In the Steele’s v FCT
case, the court noted that interest expense in general will hardly ever be capital and thus the payments will be deductible. Gino installed a new concrete floor at a cost of $12,500 by a local contractor in which completion was achieved
on the 25
th
of January 2023. Under s25-10, repairs are deductable but since concrete flooring is often more durable than wooden flooring, the nature of this outgoing is not a mere repair but an improvement to the property. Thus, s43-20 may apply whereby the concrete floor is considered a capital works, subject to a deduction rate of 2.5% each year (s43-25)
2.5%
×
156
365
×$
12,500
=
$
134
FCT v Western Suburbs
The interest payable of $800 for the 2 weeks that the business is closed to floor replacement will be deductible
under s8-1. ????
Cant claim division 40 if you don’t have the construction cost for the house or building itself – Need to
make sure it is separated from land because land is not deductible
CLASS DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1.
Deduction can be claimed for the donation since Surf Life Saving Australia is a deductible gift recipient
but the raffle tickets cannot be deductible under TR 2005/13 Example 22.
2.
The fine is not deductible because it is not incurred in the process of gaining assessable income under s8-1. Similarly, under s23
you cannot claim deductions for fines and penalties
3.
S8-1 A briefcase is deductible and a handbag that performs the same function is also deductible
a.
S40-80(2) <$300 if it is an exclusive business item
4.
.
a.
Sales: $1450000
b.
OP stock 22: $50,000
c.
Purchases: $600,000
d.
Closing stock: $70,000
e.
Replacement: $40,000
You can only use different methods to calculate closing stock. You cannot change opening stock. Once you calculate it. That’s it
Purchases is deductible
COGS is not deductible
Difference between opening and closing stock will either be assessable income s70-35 or allowable deduction under WEEK 8 TUTORIAL: NOTES
Partnership: Profit sharing arrangement
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
o
Business association test
general definition of partnership (common law)
Partnership is an arrangement who is carrying on business
However, the tax law definition is broader and includes the joint-receipt of income test
o
Joint-receipt of income test
If you are in joint receipt of income, then you will be treated as a partnership where losses and profits are shared equally.
FCT v McDonald
H and W owned 2 investment properties
If the business makes a profit, H takes 25% and W takes 75%
If the business takes a loss, H takes 100%
Done to reduce own tax
Court
: does not fall under the business association test and thus will treat it
as the JRI test
share losses and profits equally.
Three main factors to determine whether common law partnership exists
o
Mutual intention
o
Capital contribution
o
Skill contribution
Benefits of partnership
o
Liability is joint
but can be negative as well
o
Pooled resources o
Income splitting
You reduce the tax you pay by weighting the sharing of profits
Shift income to lower income tax partner to reduce taxes
o
Treatment of losses
Losses are distributed in proportion to their weighting of share in the business
Losses are not quarantined and thus can use as tax loss for individual income
QUESTION 1
We use the general law partnership/Business Association Test (relationship between persons to profit)
There is active involvement in the business noted
we use business association test
o
Mc Donald case had no active involvement
passive income from property
Calculation of the net income of the partnership:
o
Need to treat partnership as an Australian resident
pays tax on world wide income
o
90 ITAA36
: Assessable Income – Deductions = Net Income
Income from business:
o
Business Income: $265,000
(Assuming gross receipts = business income)
o
Expenses: $230,000
(this includes Jane’s salary)
Partnership is not a separate legal entity and therefore partners cannot be treated as employees and pay themselves a salary
Salaries given are treated as an appropriation of profits
priority entitlement to the profits)
They are simply drawing on the profits and given priority
Thus, salaries are generally not deductible
o
Accounting Profit: $35,000
o
Add back salary: $30,000
o
Net Income: $65,000 Distribution to individual partners
S92 ITAA36
The assessable income of each partner will include “so much of the individual interest of the partner in the net income of the partnership”
o
60% for Jane
o
40% for George
Individual interest: 60/40 split as per the partnership agreement
TR 2005/7
Where there is a partner salary involves: Where the partnership profits are sufficient to cover the salary, the “salary” increases that partner’s share in the net income of the partnership. (So the “salary” will be distributed first because it is a priority entitlement to profits and then the remaining net income is split in accordance with the agreement
In this case, the net income of the parentship is $65,000 and jane is entitled to a salary of $30,000. Jane will therefore be entitled to the first 30,000 of profits
Net Income : $65,000
Jane’s salary: $30,000
Remaining: $35,0000
After this distribution, there is $35,000 remaining and will be now split according to the arrangement
o
$21,000 to Jane
o
$14,000 to George
Rental Property
We now apply the joint receipt income test:
Partnership under the extended “tax law” definition (sharing ordinary or statutory income jointly
s995-1 ITAA97
o
If you want to split profits
you should structure business according to the business association test
Contrast:
Under a general law partnership, profits/losses are split in line with the partnership
However, if there is no agreement, profits/losses are split equally between partners. IN terms of a partnership for tax purposes only (receipt of income jointly), then any profits or losses are split in accordance with property law rights
see Mc Donald case
Jane and George are not carrying on a business of renting our properties and the rental is not related to the bike shop. Therefor this is only a partnership under the extended tax law meaning and any income/losses are to be split 50/50
Rental Income: $33,500 s6-5
Less
o
Interest on Mortgage: $22,000 s8-1
o
Rental Agent Fees: $3,200 s8-1
o
Council/Water Rates: $2,500 s8-1
o
Minor repairs $500 s25-10
o
Total Expenses: $28,200
Net income from rental property: $5,300
Jane and George will each need to include $2650 in their assessable income
Assessable Income from Jane and George
Jane
George
Partnership Distribution – Bike
$51,000
$14,000
Rental Property
$2650
$2650
Employment Income
$60,000
Taxable Income $53,650
$76,650
QUESTION 2
Trusts
An arrangement between a settlor, trustee and beneficiaries.
o
Relationship between people and property whilst a partnership is a relationship between people.
Settlor creates the trust + conditions
Trustee: manages the trust
Beneficiaries: Receive the funds from the trust
o
Settlor transfers property to trustee
o
Trustee manages and administers the property for + on behalf of the beneficiaries
o
Companies are often the trustees because they have perpetual succession.
o
Trusts are isolated from creditors “corporate veil” and thus are safe in the case that the company liquidates.
Settlor can impose conditions upon who gets money and when and when a condition is met, the individual is “presently entitled”.
o
You have legal right to the money
o
E.g. if wife remarries, do not give her money but if wife does not remarry, give her $1,000,000 a year
if she does not marry she is presently entitled to the money each year.
Money that is to be distributed is called “net income of the trust”
QUESTION A
Need to look at question first and set out what you need to do
o
Each distribution – beneficiaries
1.
Would the B or T be liable for tax
2.
What amount will be taxed
3.
What tax rates will apply
4.
Ensure – relevant provisions
Net Income of the trust
95 ITAA36: Net income is in relation to a trust estate is the total assessable income
of the trust estate
(calculated as of the trustee were a taxpayer in respect of that income and were a resident) LESS allowable deductions
2 Types of Income
Trust law income o
Generally the accounting profit
Tax law income
o
Net income of the trust
o
Tax treatment of certain things are different from accounting treatment
E.g. CGT allows 50% discount but accounting treatment is different
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
As per the question, the receipts were $160,000 and expenses were $40,000. The “
income of the trust
” (i.e. trust law income/accounting profit) will therefore be $120,000.
However, since $10,000 of the expenses are not deductible, net income (tax law income) will be $130,000
Graham makes a resolution using his discretion to distribute the total income of the trust as per the income:
Note that: These are the trust income figures not “net income” as opposed to net income, which is $10,000 higher
This is where the proportionate approach comes in. In the Bamford Case, the High Court unanimously agreed that the proportionate approach is required to be used to allocate the net income of the truist
(i.e. they determined that the use of the phase “a share of the income of the trust estate” refers to the proportion of income you are entitled to rather than a fixed amount.
Under this method, the entitlement of a beneficiary is determined as a “proportion” of the income of the trust – that is when a beneficiary is allocated an amount of the trust income, the proportion of this to the overall trust income is calculated.
Beneficiary
Amount of Trust Income
Proportion of Trust income / $120,000
Apply to net income ($130,000)
Net Income allocated
Graham
$30,000 25%
25% * 130K
$32,500
Ann
$25,000
20.833%
20.833% * 130K
$27,083.33
Lachlan
$20,000
16.66%
16.66% * 130K $21,666.66
Kirsten
$15,000
12.5%
12.5%*130K
$16,250
Alpha Pty Ltd
$20,000
16.66%
16.66%*130K
$21,666.66
Retained in Trust
$10,000
8.33%
8.33%*130K
$10,833.33
Graham
(Presently entitled, not under a legal disability, and an Australian resident) – beneficiary Graham will therefore have his share of net income of the trust (
Ann
Presently entitled, not under a legal disability and an Australian resident), - the beneficiary (Ann) will therefore be assessed on her share of net income of the trust ($27,083.33) under s97
Lachlan
Trustee liable to pay tax on his behalf because he is a non-resident – sec. 98(4)
However, because he is a non-resident, consideration will need to be given as to whether the income was sourced in Aus. For the period when Lachlan was a non-resident, it is only income that has an Australian source that will be included in his
Kirsten
Trustee liable to pay tax on her behalf of her share of the net income of the trust $16250 s98(1) ITAA36
Kirsten is presently entitled but considering she is under 18, she is under a legal disability
Division 6AA tax rates apply because she is a minor (and not an “excepted” person i.e. she is not an orphan and is not working full time). Under 6AA tax is imposed at the highest marginal tax rate on income that is not excepted income employment income).
The tax rates for minors (for non-excepted)
o
$0-$416 Nil
o
$417-$1307 Nil + 66% of excess over $416
o
Over $1307 45%
The trusee will therefore be liable to pay taax on $16,250 at the rate of 45%
o
Low income offset cannot be used to reduce the amount on…
Alpha Pty Ltd
Presently entitled, not under a legal disability and Australian resident – the beneficiary (alpha) will therefore be assessed on its share of net income of the trust $21,666.67) under s97
Alpha’s other income is $1000 making their total assessable income $21,66.66
AS their turnover is well below the $50M turnover threshold, it is possible Alpha will qualify as a base rate entity and be taxed at 25%
Income retained in the trust
WEEK 9 TUTORIAL QUESTION 1
Income
Amount
Section
Notes
Sales
20,000,000
6-5
Franked divided (beta) fully franked
200,000
44(1) ITAA36
Franking Credit 200,000*(1/2.33)
(70/30)
85,714
207-20
1
Franked dividend (Gamma) 80% franked
90,000
44(1) ITAA36
Franking Credit (90,000 * 0.8) *(1/3) 24,000
207-20
2
Trust Distribution – 10% of net income
190,000
97 ITAA36
3
Trading stock adjustment (closing stock > opening stock)
250,000
70-35(2)
4
Total
20,839,714
Deductions
Staff salaries and superannuation
3,200,000
8-1 (salary)
Provision for annual leave (not deductible) Not deductible until paid
-
26-10
QUESTION A
You calculate tax liability through 7 steps and can be found in the ITAA97 s4-10(3)
Taxable Income * Rate – Tax Offset
Turnover of company is <$50M and less than 80% of income is passive income
thus the company is a base rate entity entitled to a reduced tax rate of 25%
Passive income is investment income
In company law, dividends must be paid out of profits
but no specification what type of profits
Thus, 80% franked dividends means that 80% come from after tax profit and 20% comes from accounting profits
Franked dividends are a type of statutory income
Under s44(1)
you need to include dividend income from all sources if you a resident
if non-resident only taxed on dividends from Australian sources
To Calculate Assessable Income
NOTE: ADD ALL ASSESSABLE INCOME BEFORE DEDUCTIONS AND OFFSETS
Trading Stock
considered statutory income
Beginning of Income Year Trading Stock: $900,000
Deductions for purchases of trading stock ($8,000,000)
s8-1
Closing Stock > Opening Stock = $250,000
Assessable Income s70-35(2)
Taxable Income
Taxable Income from business
o
Provision of $120,000 is not deductible
o
$20,000,000 - $3,200,000 - $1,500,000 - $1,300,000 - $8,000,000 + $250,000 o
= $6,250,000
James Flood v FCT
o
Deductibility of holiday provisions
o
Provision is not incurred
merely expenditure that is expected
Incurred
definitely committed yourself to a liability
e.g. Phone bill or rent
E.g. You start eating a packet of nuts before paying
Trust Income: 10% * $1,900,000 = $190,000
s97(1)
Total Expenses: 14M
6.8….M
Beta Ltd Dividend
o
Fully franked dividend of $200,000
30% tax
o
$200,000
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Alpha Ltd Dividend
o
Partly franked dividend of $90,000 of 80%
25% tax
o
Frankable Distribution: $72,000
o
Maximum Franking Credit: $72,000 * 0.25/(100% - 25%) = $24,000
Total Offsets:
Franking Credits
Total Tax Refund: $799,786
Franking Accounts
Franking Accounts tracks the credit/debits in the account that they can pass onto their investors
Events that generate a franking credit in a franking account
o
Payment of company tax instalment
will give credit equal to the amount of tax paid
o
Receipt of dividends
Amount of dividend received * Adjusted amount
o
Liability to pay Franking Deficit tax e.g. You have credit card and limit is 5000 but you spend 5800
charge penalty interest o
Carry forward surplus
amount of surplus carried forward
Events that give rise to franking debits
o
Company receives a tax refund o
Payment of franked dividend
Constructing the Franking Account
o
E.g. At 28/7/2022 you can only pay franking credits up to 750,000
Date
Item/Event
Credit
Debit
Balance
Section Number
1/7/2022
Carried Forward Surplus
350,000
350,000
S205-40
28/7/2022
Payment of Tax Instalment
400,000
750,000
205-15(1)
1/10/2022
Final Payment of Tax
480,000
1,230,000
30/Sept/2023
Payment of Tax
600,000
31/Dec/2023
Payment of Tax
600,000
31/March/2023
Payment of Tax
600,000
30/June/2023
Payment of Tax
600,000
1/10/2023
Tax Refund
799,785
If account is in deficit at the end of the period
you need to pay franking deficit tax DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1)
No tax payable because the income is below the tax threshold
imputation credits of $1,333
a.
25/75*1333
b.
Base rate entity gross up factor is 1/3
c.
NEED TO WRITE IF NO DEDUCTIONS
i.
Because there are no deductions, assessable income is = to taxable incom
WEEK 10 TUTORIAL
TUTORIAL NOTES
For a supply to be a taxable supply 6 elements must be present (s9-5)
o
There is a supply of g/s or anything else
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
o
A payment or some other consideration (payment) is received for the supply
including barter transactions
o
The supply is made by an entity (Either a company, partnership, sole trader, non-profit org) that is registered or required to be registered for GST
If business not registered
cannot charge GST o
The supply is made in the course of an enterprise (commercial activities that is part of ordinary course of the taxpayer’s business) that the supplier carries on;
o
The supply is connected with Australia
o
The supply is not a GST-free or input taxed supply
Anyone making a taxable supply has a liability to charge GST on that supply. S9-5
Non-assessable income non exempt
GST collected by businesses
Only registered businesses get government contracts
Output tax is the GST charged to customers on supply
Input tax is the GST paid to suppliers on purchase
Creditable Acquisition
any good that you purchase that you use in your business
QUESTION 1
Amount
GST – Output Tax
Notes
Receipts: (GST Inclusive)
$1,400,000
$127,273
Total Output Tax
127,273
Expenses (GST Inclusive)
GST Input Tax Credit $
Staff Wages
$190,000
0.00
1
Purchases of Trading Stock
$700,000
claim 1/11
$63,636
Purchase of 3 Self-
Service Cash Registers at
$20,000
$60,000
$5,455
Payment to contractor
$6,000
545
2
Total ITC’s
(1)
Employee does not constitute an enterprise, hence services they provide are not taxable supplies
a.
As such, wages can not be a creditable acquisition sec 11-5 9b) GSTAA
(2)
As a non-employee, the contractor is a separate supplier who per the facts is registered for GST
a.
He has provided a service that meets the requirements of a taxable supply
b.
The service has been acquired by Handy Hardware as part of their business and consideration has been provided
c.
Therefore it is a creditable acquisition
After comparing input taxes with output taxes (Output tax > Input tax), the excess of $57,637 must be remitted
to the ATO with the BAS return
QUESTION 2
A) Under s9-10, a purchase of a photocopier is considered a supply of goods and since the supply is made in the furtherance of enterprise in s9-5, it will be taxable supply subject to GST
o
GST Amount: $5000 *1/11 = $454.545
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
o
Before you do this question
you need to write
assuming that the accounting practice is registered and the supplier in which the photocopier is also registered, then the purchase will be a creditable acquisition in which GST will be calculated as 1/11 of the price
B) Under s38-7, medical services are GST-free and thus the chiropractor fees will not be subject to GST
o
Companies providing GST free-supplies must be registered
In a chiropractor, they will have bought many beds equipment etc. that are creditable acquisitions
No gst charged on sales/services but can claim ITCs on purchases acquired to provide the services
C) No GST will be charged on the sales/services but the health insurance company can claim ITC on purchases acquired to provide their services
o
Under s38-55, private medical insurance payments are GST-free
D) The goods must be exported within 60 days after the customer paid for the goods
o
Under s38-185, exports are GST-free and thus the goods worth $77,000 exported to Japan will not be subject to GST
QUESTION 3
A) First define what an ITC is o
Then say
assuming the supplier of the fac machine and the accounting partnership are registered for GST then the fax machine will constitute as a creditable acquisition and the business will be entitled to a ITC of 1/11 of the acquisition which will be $100
A) Under s11-1, input tax credits are entitled in the case that a creditable acquisition is made. Fax machines purchased by a partnership of accountants will be eligible for input tax credits as the purchase was made in the furtherance of enterprise under s11-5
o
The input tax credits will be: $1,100*1/11 = 100
my answer
B) First consider: Is the dentist registered for GST and is the daughter registered for GST
2
nd
Is the mobile phone used in the practice o
The purchase of the phone does not satisfy the requirements to be classified as a taxable supply under s9-40. The purchase was made for domestic purposes and was not made in the carrying on of a business
no creditable purpose. Thus, there will be no input tax credits available.
QUESTION 4
A) The contributions to Samantha’s superannuation fund will be taxed at a rate of 15% and not be eligible for FBT tax under s58W
B) No
QUESTION 5
A fringe benefit
non cash remuneration (in addition to salary and wages) provided to employee and/or associates by employer after the 1/7/86
Fringe benefits tax year: 1
st
April
31
st
March
Otherwise deductible reduction
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Type 1 FBT: Creditable acquisitions of a business
Type 2: GST free supplies and Input tax supplies
B) Payment of professional journal is exempt from GST
C) $4000 relocation expenses paid for an employee and his family to move interstate
exempt from GST Because the government wants to encourage the mobility of the workforce. Employer will get a deduction for this expense and a deduction for the FBT they will be paying
D) GST free because the health services are GST free
E) Gym membership GST free
F) CLASS DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
(1)
PRACTICE
QUESTION 5 FBT
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help