Testing a Hybrid Solar Panel
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Massachusetts, Lowell *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
4030
Subject
Mechanical Engineering
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
8
Uploaded by jidewand83
University of Massachusetts Lowell
James B. Francis College of Engineering
Department of Mechanical Engineering
MECH4030 Thermo-Fluids Laboratory
Section number: 806 C
Group Letter:
C
Experiment Number and Title: Testing a Hybrid Solar Panel
Date of Experiment: December 5
th
, 2017
Group Names:
1. J. Didier Wandi
2. Chris Mautino
3. James Bremic
________________________________________________________________________________
Instructor’s Comments:
Date of submission:
December 5
th
, 2017
Grade:
…………………
Testing a Hybrid Solar Panel
UMass Lowell
The
optimal azimuth that the modules should be directed towards would be true south, since this is the direction that the northeastern United States that receives the most energy from the sun. The azimuth can be approximated by using Figure 1
, with the knowledge that Lowell, MA, is located at approximately 42.6334
o
N. Figure 1: Azimuth of Solar Panel vs Latitude of Test Site, take latitude and follow it to as close to 100%,
then read azimuth http://www.renewable-energy-concepts.com/solarenergy/solar-basics/orientation-
azimuth-angle.html
The angle (amount of tilt) that the solar collectors should be mounted at depends on the latitude of the test location. The optimal tilt angle can then be found using Table 1
.
Testing a Hybrid Solar Panel
2
1/20/2024
Testing a Hybrid Solar Panel
UMass Lowell
Table 1: Optimal Tilt Angles for Solar Collectors Based on Latitude
http://www.solarpaneltilt.com/
Latitude
Summer
angle
Spring/autumn
angle
Winter
angle
25°
-1.3
22.2
46.3
30°
3.3
27.1
50.7
35°
7.9
32.0
55.2
40°
12.5
36.9
59.6
45°
17.1
41.8
64.1
50°
21.7
46.7
68.5
The optimal tilt angle was interpolated to be approximately 14.9
o
, assuming that the experiment would be carried out during the summer months. This is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: Azimuth and Tilt Angle of Solar Panels
The thermocouples would be located on top of the solar panels, in a configuration such as shown in Figure 3. They would be divided evenly among each panel (15 each).
Testing a Hybrid Solar Panel
3
1/20/2024
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Testing a Hybrid Solar Panel
UMass Lowell
Figure 3: Location of Thermocouples on Solar Panel
One of the panels is a standalone system which would be used as the control for the experiment. The other panel would be hooked up to the SunDrum system. Both systems
would then feed the voltage and current data taken from their respective thermocouples,
through the selector switch, to the multi-meter where it can be verified by the experimenter. It will then be fed into the software program where it can be further analyzed. Figure 4
shows the overall setup of the experiment.
Testing a Hybrid Solar Panel
4
1/20/2024
Testing a Hybrid Solar Panel
UMass Lowell
Figure 4: Experiment Layout
The data collected would consist of the voltage, current, and temperature of each of the solar panels taken at every hour.
Testing a Hybrid Solar Panel
5
1/20/2024
Testing a Hybrid Solar Panel
UMass Lowell
Test
5:0
0
AM
6:0
0
AM
7:00
AM
8:0
0
AM
9:0
0
AM
10:0
0 AM
11:0
0 AM
12:0
0 AM
1:0
0
PM
2:00
PM
3:0
0
PM
4:0
0
PM
5:0
0
PM
6:0
0
PM
7:0
0
PM
Power
Power
Amps
Angle
TC 1
T
1
T
2
TC 2
T
1
T
2
TC 3
T
1
T
2
TC 4
T
1
T
2
TC 5
T
1
T
2
TC 6
T
1
T
2
TC 7
T
1
T
2
TC 8
T
1
T
2
TC 9
T
1
T
Testing a Hybrid Solar Panel
6
1/20/2024
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Testing a Hybrid Solar Panel
UMass Lowell
2
TC 10
T
1
T
2
TC 11
T
1
T
2
TC 12
T
1
T
2
TC 13
T
1
T
2
TC 14
T
1
T
2
TC 15
T
1
T
2
** TC represents Thermocouple
** Extended all to TC 15
The results of the experiment can be used to prove the claim made by Sundrum. A flash of power was made in the lab setting to understand how sunlight can heat up the solar panel. A P-I chart was generated that represented how the solar panel will achieve a certain point where the voltage drops off. This is important to understand how the solar panel will behave in an outdoor setting. The experiment shows the voltage at 50°C drops off significantly earlier than the 25°C panel for 1,000 W/m
2
power. The sun has a power of 1,000 W/m
2
, but the power will change according to the suns position throughout the day. Power, voltage, angle and temperature of the thermocouples will be measured every hour the sun is in the sky. It was decided that significant sun positions occur hourly. The temperature and voltage drops can be used to create a similar plot to
the lab experimentation. Comparing the real life solar panel temperature, which is presumably higher than the ambient temperature of 25°C, will result in showing voltage drop offs occur due to higher temperatures. The Testing a Hybrid Solar Panel
7
1/20/2024
Information Recorded to Test Efficiency of Sun Drum Solar Panel
Testing a Hybrid Solar Panel
UMass Lowell
efficiency can be calculated based on this voltage percent difference. The laboratory results show that the voltage drops off is significant at 50°C; however, this is not a likely outside temperature on a daily basis. The surface temperature of the solar panel will be tested resulting with voltage outputs that can be compared in graphs. This can prove or disprove the claim of 3-4% more efficiency. The voltage and current temperature coefficients could easily be calculated after data collection. The results will
be very predictable assuming the solar panel does not degrade with use. Depending on the number of clouds, trees blocking, and position to the sun, the voltage and current relations can be calculated using simple relations of P
=
IV
and P
A
=
e σT
4
. Assuming the sun is a perfect blackbody the coefficients can be predicted. Testing a Hybrid Solar Panel
8
1/20/2024
Related Documents
Related Questions
Quastions about renewable
arrow_forward
Need
arrow_forward
Please answer within one hr i will give good rating.
arrow_forward
answer pls
arrow_forward
I need an answer in half an hour
arrow_forward
MECT361
Mechatronics Components and Instrumentation
PLEASE GIVE ME THE short answer and wite it by keyword
thanks
arrow_forward
The engineering constants for an orthotropic material are found to be
E1= 27.579 GPa V12 = 0.2 G12=41.368 GPa
E2=20.684 GPa V23 = 0.4 G23=48.263 GPa
E3=21.374 GPaV13 = 0.6G31=13.790 GPa
Find the stiffness matrix [C] and the compliance matrix [S] for the preceding orthotropicmaterial.
arrow_forward
Subject : engineering design - DFMA
arrow_forward
How do a unicycle and a twoaxle car react differently to road bumps?
arrow_forward
2. Please help me solve both parts to this mech. engineering question
arrow_forward
1) The engineering constants for an orthotropic material are found to be
Ej= 27.579 GPa
E2=20.684 GPa
E3=21.374 GPa
V12 = 0.2
G12=41.368 GPa
V23 = 0.4
G23=48.263 GPa
V13 = 0.6
G31=13.790 GPa
Find the stiffness matrix [C] and the compliance matrix [S] for the preceding orthotropic
material.
arrow_forward
In engineering, ceramic, metallic and polymeric materials are used; select their order based on the intensity of their intermolecular bonding forces:
a. Ceramic > metallic > polymericb. Polymeric > metallic > ceramicc. Ceramic < metallic < polymericd. Metallic > ceramic > polymeric
arrow_forward
A thermoformed disc ending at a diameter of 2 cm and a thickness of 1 cm
started from a disc with a diameter of 1 cm. What was the original
thickness?
1 cm
2 cm
3 cm
4 cm
O not enough info
arrow_forward
Using the data in Table 18.1, (a) calculate the resistance of an aluminum wire with 5 mm
diameter and 5 m length. (b) What is the current flow if the potential drop across the ends of
the wire is 0.04 V?
Table 18.1 Room-Temperature Electrical
Conductivities for Nine Common
Metals and Alloys
Electrical Conductivity
[(N-m)-']
Metal
6.8 × 107
6.0 × 107
4.3 × 107
3.8 × 107
1.6 × 107
1.0 × 107
0.94 × 107
0.6 × 107
0.2 × 107
Silver
Copper
Gold
Aluminum
Brass (70Cu–30ZN)
Iron
Platinum
Plain carbon steel
Stainless steel
arrow_forward
The energy densities of various types of coal are listed
below:
Subbituminous 31 k]/g
Lignite 26 kJ/g
An unknown sample of one of these coals is burned in an
0.367-g sample is used, the temperature change is 8.75°C
Anthracite 35 kJ/g
Bituminous 28 kJ/g
apparatus with a calorimeter constant of 1.3 kJ/°C. When a
Which type of coal is the sample?
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you

Principles of Heat Transfer (Activate Learning wi...
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:9781305387102
Author:Kreith, Frank; Manglik, Raj M.
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Related Questions
- The engineering constants for an orthotropic material are found to be E1= 27.579 GPa V12 = 0.2 G12=41.368 GPa E2=20.684 GPa V23 = 0.4 G23=48.263 GPa E3=21.374 GPaV13 = 0.6G31=13.790 GPa Find the stiffness matrix [C] and the compliance matrix [S] for the preceding orthotropicmaterial.arrow_forwardSubject : engineering design - DFMAarrow_forwardHow do a unicycle and a twoaxle car react differently to road bumps?arrow_forward
- 2. Please help me solve both parts to this mech. engineering questionarrow_forward1) The engineering constants for an orthotropic material are found to be Ej= 27.579 GPa E2=20.684 GPa E3=21.374 GPa V12 = 0.2 G12=41.368 GPa V23 = 0.4 G23=48.263 GPa V13 = 0.6 G31=13.790 GPa Find the stiffness matrix [C] and the compliance matrix [S] for the preceding orthotropic material.arrow_forwardIn engineering, ceramic, metallic and polymeric materials are used; select their order based on the intensity of their intermolecular bonding forces: a. Ceramic > metallic > polymericb. Polymeric > metallic > ceramicc. Ceramic < metallic < polymericd. Metallic > ceramic > polymericarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Heat Transfer (Activate Learning wi...Mechanical EngineeringISBN:9781305387102Author:Kreith, Frank; Manglik, Raj M.Publisher:Cengage Learning

Principles of Heat Transfer (Activate Learning wi...
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:9781305387102
Author:Kreith, Frank; Manglik, Raj M.
Publisher:Cengage Learning