1.What Strategies particularly appropriate for evaluation arguments does Jackie wyngard use in her introduction?
Jackie Wyngaard uses strategies such as defining terms (history vs trivia), providing background information on Experience Music Project, and asking thought-provoking questions to engage the reader in her introduction.
2. How has Jackie chosen to classify Experience Music Project? What criteria does she choose?
Jackie chooses to classify Experience Music Project as more of a music trivia than a music history museum. She uses criteria such as the focus on pop culture artifacts, interactive exhibits, and emphasis on entertainment rather than educational content.
3. In the match part of her argument,what evidence does jackie use support
her assessment of Experience Music Project?
In the match part of her argument, Jackie uses evidence such as specific exhibits and attractions at Experience Music Project, reviews and visitor feedback, and comparisons to other music museums to support her assessment. She also highlights the museum's emphasis on popular culture and entertainment over historical accuracy.
4.What alternative views does she acknowledge and where in her argument does she choose to treat them? Does she anticipate objections to her criteria or to the match part of her argument? What other objections might people raise to her argument?
Jackie acknowledges alternative views that may see Experience Music Project as a valuable music history museum, particularly for its collection of
artifacts and interactive exhibits. She addresses these views by emphasizing the lack of in-depth historical content and educational value compared to traditional music history museums. She anticipates objections to her criteria by acknowledging that some may value entertainment and pop culture in a museum experience, but she argues that this does not necessarily equate to a focus on music history.
